sociolpolitolВестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политологияMoscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science1029-37362541-8769Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University10.24290/1029-3736-2024-30-3-231-253sociolpolitol-1317Research ArticleСОЦИОЛОГИЯ СЕМЬИ И ДЕМОГРАФИИSOCIOLOGY OF A FAMILY AND DEMOGRAPHYЗумеры и бумеры: межпоколенная солидарность в современном российском обществеZoomers and boomers: intergenerational solidarity in modern Russian societyПарфеноваО. А.ParfenovaO. A.

О.А. Парфенова, канд. социол. наук, старший научный сотрудник

ул. Большая Андроньевская, д. 5. стр. 1, г. Москва, 109544

Parfenova Oksana A., Ph.D. sociol. Sciences, Senior Researcher

st. Bolshaya Andronyevskaya, 5. building 1, Moscow, Russian Federation, 109544

oparfenova2023@ya.ruПетуховаИ. С.PetukhovaI. S.

И.С. Петухова, канд. социол. наук, старший научный сотрудник

ул. Большая Андроньевская, д. 5. стр. 1, г. Москва, 109544

Petukhova Irina S., Ph.D. sociol. Sciences, Senior Researcher

st. Bolshaya Andronyevskaya, 5. building 1, Moscow, 109544

irini-ptz@yandex.ruСоциологический институт РАН – филиал ФНИСЦ РАН, Санкт-ПетербургРоссияInstitute of Sociology of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation202419082024303231253Copyright © Парфенова О.А., Петухова И.С., 20242024Парфенова О.А., Петухова И.С.Parfenova O.A., Petukhova I.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/1317

В своем исследовании мы рассматриваем основания и особенности межпоколенной солидарности между современным молодым поколением России (зумерами) и их прародителями (бумерами), принимая во внимание, что зумеры являются первым полностью постсоветским поколением, а бумеры – советским, прошедшим период активной социализации в совершенно иной социально-экономической и политической формации. Поэтому, мы не просто изучаем пространство межпоколенного обмена, но и в некотором смысле преемственность между разными эпохами – безвозвратно ушедшим советским прошлым и текущим настоящим. Материалом для анализа служат 34 интервью с зумерами и 20 интервью с их бабушками/дедушками. Теоретическими основаниями исследования выступают теория поколений и модель межпоколенной солидарности В. Бенгтсона и его коллег. В поддержании солидарности ключевую роль играют нематериальные трансферты, которые заключаются в эмоциональном обмене и поддержке, а также специфической роли обеих сторон. Старшие выступают источником знаний не только о прошлом семьи, но и о прошлом ушедшей эпохи, а младшие служат для своих прародителей надежными проводниками в современный цифровой мир. Такая уникальная экспертность обеих сторон наряду с общей неконфликтностью зумеров позволяет снизить конфликтный потенциал отношений, в которых сталкиваются не просто два поколения, но две совершенно разные эпохи и системы ценностей. Свои отношения с внуками российские бумеры оценивают как более теплые и близкие в сравнении с теми, которые были у них с прародителями.

In our study, we examine the foundations and features of intergenerational solidarity between the modern young generation of Russia (zoomers) and their ancestors (boomers), taking into account that zoomers are the first completely post-Soviet generation, and boomers are the Soviet generation, having gone through a period of active socialization in a completely different social-economic and political formation. Therefore, we are not just studying the space of intergenerational exchange, but also, in a sense, continuity between different eras – the irretrievably gone Soviet past and the current present. The material for analysis is 34 interviews with zoomers and 20 interviews with their grandparents. The theoretical basis of the study is the theory of generations and the model of intergenerational solidarity of V. Bengtson and his colleagues. In maintaining solidarity, intangible transfers play a key role, which consist of emotional exchange and support, as well as the specific role of both parties. The elders act as a source of knowledge not only about the family’s past, but also about the past of a bygone era, and the younger ones serve as reliable guides for their ancestors into the modern digital world. This unique expertise of both parties, along with the general non-conflict nature of zoomers, makes it possible to reduce the conflict potential of relationships in which not just two generations collide, but two completely different eras and value systems. Russian boomers assess their relationships with their grandchildren as warmer and closer in comparison with those they had with their grandparents.

межпоколенные отношениямежпоколенная солидарностьзумерыбумерытеория поколенийпрародителиконфликт поколенийintergenerational relationsintergenerational solidarityzoomersBoomerstheory of generationsancestorsgeneration conflictReferencesГурко Т.А. Взаимопомощь поколений в городских семьях // Женщина в российском обществе. 2023. № 3. С. 43–58. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2023.3.4.Aboim S., Vasconcelos P. From political to social generations: a critical reappraisal of Mannheim’s classical approach // European Journal of Social Theory. 2014. Vol. 2. N 17. P. 165–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013509681.Кулакова А.Б. Поколение Z: теоретический аспект // Вопросы территориального развития. 2018. № 2 (42). С. 1–10. DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2018.2.42.6.Bengtson V. Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. The Burgess award lecture // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2001. N 63. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x.Левада Ю. Координаты человека к итогам изучения “человека советского” // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2001. № 1. С. 7–15.Bengtson V., Giarrusso R., Mabry B., Silverstein M. Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2002. N 64. P. 568–576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00568.x.Мангейм К. Очерки социологии знания: Проблема поколений – состязательность – экономические амбиции. М., 2000. С. 1–164.Bernhold Q.S. Grandparents’ affectionate communication toward grandchildren and grandchildren’s mental health difficulties: The moderating role of future time perspective // Health Communication. 2020. N 35. P. 822–831. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1593080.Миронова А.А. Источники статистических данных о частных межпоколенных трансфертах в России: ограничения и перспективы // Вопросы статистики. 2015. № 3. С. 39–47.Boyle K. Millennial career-identities: reevaluating social identification and intergenerational relations // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2023. N 21 (1). P. 89–109. DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2021.1945989.Парфенова О.А. Поколение Z как самые молодые из нынешних взрослых: штрихи к портрету зумеров сквозь призму межпоколенных отношений // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. Серия: Социальные науки. 2024. № 2 (74). С. 126–133. DOI: 10.52452/18115942_2024_2_126.Bristow J. The sociology of generations. L., 2016.Парфенова О.А., Петухова И.С. Влияние пандемии COVID-19 на жизнь старшего поколения в городском и сельском контекстах // Социологические исследования. 2022. № 5 (5). С. 71–80. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250018704-7.Brooke J., Jackson D. Older people and COVID‐19: isolation, risk and ageism // The Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2020. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocn.15274 (accessed: 15.09.2020).Попов Н.П. Российские и американские поколения XX века: откуда пришли миллениалы? // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2018. № 4 (146). С. 309–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.15.Burgess E.W. The family as a unity of interacting personalities // The Family. 1926. N 3.Радаев В. Миллениалы. Как меняется российское общество. М., 2019.Cogin J. Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2012. N 23. P. 2268–2294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.610967.Саралиева З.Х., Судьин С.А., Янак А.Л. Прародительские отношения в современной российской семье: опыт пилотного исследования // Сборник тезисов докладов участников I Российско-Иранского социологического форума. М., 2020. С. 509–521.Connolly J. Generational conflict and the sociology of generations: Mannheim and Elias reconsidered // Theory, Culture & Society. 2019. Vol. 36. N 7–8. P. 153–172. DOI: 10.1177/0263276419827085.Стрижицкая О.Ю., Петраш М.Д. Межпоколенные отношения как фактор психологического благополучия студентов: опосредующая роль временнóй перспективы // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. 2022. № 4 (12). С. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.406.Denzin N.K. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. N.Y., 2017.Яницкий М.С. и др. Система ценностных ориентаций “поколения Z”: социальные, культурные и демографические детерминанты // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2019. № 72. С. 46–67. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/3.Elias N. The society of individuals. Dublin, 2012.Giarrusso R. et al. Grandparent-Adult Grandchild Affection and Consensus // Journal of Family Issues. 2002. Vol 4. N 22. P. 456–477. DOI: 10.1177/019251301022004004.Giarrusso R. et al. Grandparent-Adult Grandchild Affection and Consensus // Journal of Family Issues. 2002. Vol 4. N 22. P. 456–477. DOI: 10.1177/019251301022004004.Gurko T.A. Vzaimopomoshch’ pokolenij v gorodskih sem’yah [Mutual assistance between generations in urban families] // Zhenshchina v rossijskom obshchestve. 2023. N 3. S. 43–58. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2023.3.4 (in Russian).Gurko T.A. Vzaimopomoshch’ pokolenij v gorodskih sem’yah [Mutual assistance between generations in urban families] // Zhenshchina v rossijskom obshchestve. 2023. N 3. S. 43–58. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2023.3.4 (in Russian).Howe N., Strauss W. The next 20 years: how customer and workforce attitudes will evolve // Harvard Business Review. 2007. N 85. P. 47–52. PMID: 17642125.Howe N., Strauss W. The next 20 years: how customer and workforce attitudes will evolve // Harvard Business Review. 2007. N 85. P. 47–52. PMID: 17642125.Joshi A., Dencker J., Franz G. Generations in organizations // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2011. N 31. P. 177–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.002.Joshi A., Dencker J., Franz G. Generations in organizations // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2011. N 31. P. 177–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.002.Kertzer D.I. Generation as a sociological problem // Annual review of sociology. 1983. Vol. 9. N 1. P. 125–149.Kertzer D.I. Generation as a sociological problem // Annual review of sociology. 1983. Vol. 9. N 1. P. 125–149.Kulakova A.B. Pokolenie Z: teoreticheskij aspect [Generation Z: theoretical aspect] // Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya. 2018. N 2 (42). S. 1–10. DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2018.2.42.6 (in Russian).Kulakova A.B. Pokolenie Z: teoreticheskij aspect [Generation Z: theoretical aspect] // Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya. 2018. N 2 (42). S. 1–10. DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2018.2.42.6 (in Russian).Kwong A.N., Yan E.C. The role of quality of face-to-face intergenerational contact in reducing ageism: the perspectives of young people // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2023. N 21 (1). P. 136–151. DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2021.1952134.Kwong A.N., Yan E.C. The role of quality of face-to-face intergenerational contact in reducing ageism: the perspectives of young people // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2023. N 21 (1). P. 136–151. DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2021.1952134.Levada Y.U. Koordinaty cheloveka k itogam izucheniya “cheloveka sovetskogo” [Human coordinates to the results of studying the “Soviet man”] // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2001. N 1. S. 7–15 (in Russian).Levada Y.U. Koordinaty cheloveka k itogam izucheniya “cheloveka sovetskogo” [Human coordinates to the results of studying the “Soviet man”] // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2001. N 1. S. 7–15 (in Russian).Mangejm K. Ocherki sociologii znaniya: Problema pokolenij – sostyaza-tel’nost’ – ekonomicheskie ambicii [Essays on the sociology of knowledge: The problem of generations – competition – economic ambitions]. M., 2000. S. 1–164 (in Russian).Mangejm K. Ocherki sociologii znaniya: Problema pokolenij – sostyaza-tel’nost’ – ekonomicheskie ambicii [Essays on the sociology of knowledge: The problem of generations – competition – economic ambitions]. M., 2000. S. 1–164 (in Russian).Mills T.L., Wakeman M.A., Fea C.B. Adult grandchildren’s perceptions of emotional closeness and consensus with their maternal and paternal grandparents // Journal of Family Issues. 2001. Vol. 4. N 22. P. 427–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022004003.Mills T.L., Wakeman M.A., Fea C.B. Adult grandchildren’s perceptions of emotional closeness and consensus with their maternal and paternal grandparents // Journal of Family Issues. 2001. Vol. 4. N 22. P. 427–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022004003.Mironova A.A. Istochniki statisticheskih dannyh o chastnyh mezhpokolennyh transfertah v Rossii: ogranicheniya i perspektivy [Sources of statistical data on private intergenerational transfers in Russia: limitations and prospects] // Voprosy statistiki. 2015. N 3. S. 39–47 (in Russian).Mironova A.A. Istochniki statisticheskih dannyh o chastnyh mezhpokolennyh transfertah v Rossii: ogranicheniya i perspektivy [Sources of statistical data on private intergenerational transfers in Russia: limitations and prospects] // Voprosy statistiki. 2015. N 3. S. 39–47 (in Russian).Nakai Y. Why we study generations // Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2015. Vol. 3. N 8. P. 331–334.Nakai Y. Why we study generations // Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2015. Vol. 3. N 8. P. 331–334.Parfenova O.A. Pokolenie Z kak samye molodye iz nyneshnih vzroslyh: shtrihi k portretu zumerov skvoz’ prizmu mezhpokolennyh otnoshenij [Generation Z as the youngest of current adults: hints to the portrait of zoomers through the lens of intergenerational relations] // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Social’nye nauki. 2024. N 2 (74). S. 126–133. DOI: 10.52452/18115942_2024_2_126 (in Russian).Parfenova O.A. Pokolenie Z kak samye molodye iz nyneshnih vzroslyh: shtrihi k portretu zumerov skvoz’ prizmu mezhpokolennyh otnoshenij [Generation Z as the youngest of current adults: hints to the portrait of zoomers through the lens of intergenerational relations] // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Social’nye nauki. 2024. N 2 (74). S. 126–133. DOI: 10.52452/18115942_2024_2_126 (in Russian).Parfenova O.A., Petuhova I.S. Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na zhizn’ starshego pokoleniya v gorodskom i sel’skom kontekstah [The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the life of the older generation in urban and rural contexts] // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2022. N 5 (5). S. 71–80. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250018704-7 (in Russian).Parfenova O.A., Petuhova I.S. Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na zhizn’ starshego pokoleniya v gorodskom i sel’skom kontekstah [The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the life of the older generation in urban and rural contexts] // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2022. N 5 (5). S. 71–80. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250018704-7 (in Russian).Pilcher J. Mannheim’s sociology of generations: An undervalued legacy // British Journal of Sociology. 1994. N 3. P. 481–495.Pilcher J. Mannheim’s sociology of generations: An undervalued legacy // British Journal of Sociology. 1994. N 3. P. 481–495.Popescu A. The brief history of generation–defining the concept of generation. An analysis of literature review // Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology. 2019. Vol. 10. N 2. P. 15–30.Popescu A. The brief history of generation–defining the concept of generation. An analysis of literature review // Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology. 2019. Vol. 10. N 2. P. 15–30.Popov N.P. Rossijskie i amerikanskie pokoleniya XX veka: otkuda pri-shli millenialy? [Russian and American generations of the 20th century: where did the millennials come from?] // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2018. N 4 (146). S. 309–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.15 (in Russian).Popov N.P. Rossijskie i amerikanskie pokoleniya XX veka: otkuda pri-shli millenialy? [Russian and American generations of the 20th century: where did the millennials come from?] // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2018. N 4 (146). S. 309–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.15 (in Russian).Purhonen S. Generations on paper: Bourdieu and the critique of “generationalism” // Social Science Information. 2016. Vol. 1. N 55. P. 94–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018415608967.Purhonen S. Generations on paper: Bourdieu and the critique of “generationalism” // Social Science Information. 2016. Vol. 1. N 55. P. 94–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018415608967.Radaev V. Millenialy. Kak menyaetsya rossijskoe obshchestvo [Millennials. How Russian society is changing]. M., 2019 (in Russian).Radaev V. Millenialy. Kak menyaetsya rossijskoe obshchestvo [Millennials. How Russian society is changing]. M., 2019 (in Russian).Saralieva Z.H., Sud’in S.A., Yanak A.L. Praroditel’skie otnosheniya v sovremennoj rossijskoj sem’e: opyt pilotnogo issledovaniya [Grandparental relations in a modern Russian family: experience of a pilot study] // Sbornik tezisov dokladov uchastnikov I Rossijsko-Iranskogo sociologicheskogo foruma. M., 2020. S. 509–521 (in Russian).Saralieva Z.H., Sud’in S.A., Yanak A.L. Praroditel’skie otnosheniya v sovremennoj rossijskoj sem’e: opyt pilotnogo issledovaniya [Grandparental relations in a modern Russian family: experience of a pilot study] // Sbornik tezisov dokladov uchastnikov I Rossijsko-Iranskogo sociologicheskogo foruma. M., 2020. S. 509–521 (in Russian).Silverstein M., Bengtson V.L. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families // American Journal of Sociology. 1997. N 103. P. 429–460. DOI: 10.1086/231213.Silverstein M., Bengtson V.L. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families // American Journal of Sociology. 1997. N 103. P. 429–460. DOI: 10.1086/231213.Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: the history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. N.Y., 1992.Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: the history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. N.Y., 1992.Strizhickaya O.Yu., Petrash M.D. Mezhpokolennye otnosheniya kak faktor psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya studentov: oposreduyushchaya rol’ vremennój perspektivy [Intergenerational relations as a factor in the psychological well-being of students: the mediating role of time perspective] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologiya. 2022. N 4 (12). S. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.406 (in Russian).Strizhickaya O.Yu., Petrash M.D. Mezhpokolennye otnosheniya kak faktor psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya studentov: oposreduyushchaya rol’ vremennój perspektivy [Intergenerational relations as a factor in the psychological well-being of students: the mediating role of time perspective] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologiya. 2022. N 4 (12). S. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.406 (in Russian).Suitor J.J., Sechrist J., Gilligan M., Pillemer K. Intergenerational relations in later-life families // Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research / Ed. by R. Settersten, J. Angel. N.Y., 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7374-0_11.Suitor J.J., Sechrist J., Gilligan M., Pillemer K. Intergenerational relations in later-life families // Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research / Ed. by R. Settersten, J. Angel. N.Y., 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7374-0_11.Wagner L.S., Luger T.M. Generation to generation: effects of intergenerational interactions on attitudes // Educational Gerontology. 2021. Vol. 47. N 1. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2020.1847392.Wagner L.S., Luger T.M. Generation to generation: effects of intergenerational interactions on attitudes // Educational Gerontology. 2021. Vol. 47. N 1. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2020.1847392.Webster M., Norwood K., Waterworth J., Leavey G. Effectiveness of intergenerational exchange programs between adolescents and older adults: a systematic review // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2023. N 3. P. 1–42. DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2023.2267532.Webster M., Norwood K., Waterworth J., Leavey G. Effectiveness of intergenerational exchange programs between adolescents and older adults: a systematic review // Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 2023. N 3. P. 1–42. DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2023.2267532.White J. Thinking generations // The British Journal of Sociology. 2013. Vol. 64. N 2. P. 216-247. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12015.White J. Thinking generations // The British Journal of Sociology. 2013. Vol. 64. N 2. P. 216-247. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12015.Yanickij M.S. i dr. Sistema cennostnyh orientacij “pokoleniya Z”: social’nye, kul’turnye i demograficheskie determinant [System of value orientations of “generation Z”: social, cultural and demographic determinants] // Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2019. N 72. S. 46–67. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/3 (in Russian).Yanickij M.S. i dr. Sistema cennostnyh orientacij “pokoleniya Z”: social’nye, kul’turnye i demograficheskie determinant [System of value orientations of “generation Z”: social, cultural and demographic determinants] // Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2019. N 72. S. 46–67. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/3 (in Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.