sociolpolitolВестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политологияMoscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science1029-37362541-8769Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University10.24290/1029-3736-2016-22-4-81-97sociolpolitol-231Research ArticleСОЦИОЛОГИЯ ГЛОБАЛИЗАЦИИSOCIOLOGY OF GLOBALIZATIONИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТА ГЛОБАЛИЗАЦИИ СКВОЗЬ ПРИЗМУ МИР-СИСТЕМНОГО АНАЛИЗАTHE CONCEPT OF GLOBALIZATION FROM THE WORLD-SYSTEM PERSPECTIVEМалюкА. Н.MaliukA. N.

канд. социол. наук, старший научный сотрудник отдела экономической социологии

candidate of sociology, senior researcher of Department of economic sociology

malyuka@mail.ruИнститут социологии НАН УкраиныУкраинаInstitute of sociology NAS of UkraineUkraine2016180520172248197Copyright © Малюк А.Н., 20172017Малюк А.Н.Maliuk A.N.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/231

В статье сопоставляются подходы к исследованию современной стадии развития мировой цивилизации, которые были разработаны в концепциях глобализации и в мир-системном анализе (МСА). В ней подчеркивается, что исследования глобализации и МСА являются соперничающими аналитическими перспективами. В то время как исследования глобализации рассматривают современный период общественного развития как качественно новую глобальную стадию в истории человечества, мир-системный анализ утверждает, что сущность новой исторической стадии состоит в кризисе современной глобальной капиталистической системы, ее трансформации и переходе к новой исторической системе. Сравнение исследований глобализации и мир-системного анализа показывает, что последний обеспечивает более четкое представление о социальной реальности.

 

The article compares the approaches to the study of the contemporary stage of development of world civilization that were developed in the concepts of globalization and world-systems analysis. It is emphasized that the globalization studies and WSA are competing analytical perspectives. While the globalization studies consider the contemporary period of social development as a qualitatively new global stage in the history of humanity, the world-systems analysis argues that the essence of a new historical stage is the crisis of the modern global capitalist system and its transformation towards the new historical system. A comparison study of globalization and world-systems analysis demonstrates that the latter provides more clear picture of social reality. The world-system reinterpretation of the concept of globalizations is proposed.

 

глобализациямир-системный анализглобальный капитализмглобальный кризисglobalizationworld-system analysisglobal capitalismglobal crisisReferencesAmin S. Ending the crisis of capitalism or ending capitalism? Dakar, 2011. Arrighi G., Silver B.J. Chaos and governance in the modern world system. Minneapolis, 1999.Amin S. Ending the crisis of capitalism or ending capitalism? Dakar, 2011. Arrighi G., Silver B.J. Chaos and governance in the modern world system. Minneapolis, 1999.Arrighi G., Silver B.J., Brewer B.D. Industrial convergence and the persistence of the North-South Divide // Studies in Comparative International Development. 2003. Vol. 38. N 1. Р. 3–31.Arrighi G., Silver B.J., Brewer B.D. Industrial convergence and the persistence of the North-South Divide // Studies in Comparative International Development. 2003. Vol. 38. N 1. Р. 3–31.Burbach R., Robinson W. The fin de siecle debate: globalization as global shift // Science and Society. 1999. Vol. 63. N 1. P. 10–39.Burbach R., Robinson W. The fin de siecle debate: globalization as global shift // Science and Society. 1999. Vol. 63. N 1. P. 10–39.Boli J., Thomas M. World culture in the world polity // American Sociological Review. 1997. Vol. 62. N 2. P. 171–190.Boli J., Thomas M. World culture in the world polity // American Sociological Review. 1997. Vol. 62. N 2. P. 171–190.Chase-Dunn C. Globalization: a world-systems perspective // Journal of World-Systems Research. 2000. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 187–216.Chase-Dunn C. Globalization: a world-systems perspective // Journal of World-Systems Research. 2000. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 187–216.Chase-Dunn C., Yukio Kawano, Brewer B.D. Trade globalization since 1795: waves of integration in the world-system // American Sociological Review. 2000. Vol. 65. N 1. P. 77–95.Chase-Dunn C., Yukio Kawano, Brewer B.D. Trade globalization since 1795: waves of integration in the world-system // American Sociological Review. 2000. Vol. 65. N 1. P. 77–95.Frank A.G. ReOrient: global economy in the Asian age. Berkeley, 1998. Friedman H. Prometheus rebound // Contemporary Sociology. 1996. Vol. 25. N 3. Р. 319–322.Frank A.G. ReOrient: global economy in the Asian age. Berkeley, 1998. Friedman H. Prometheus rebound // Contemporary Sociology. 1996. Vol. 25. N 3. Р. 319–322.Hopkins T.K., Wallerstein I. The age of transition: trajectory of the World-system, 1945–2025. L., 1996.Hopkins T.K., Wallerstein I. The age of transition: trajectory of the World-system, 1945–2025. L., 1996.Martin W.G. Still partners and still dissident after all these years? Wallerstein, World revolutions and World-System perspective // Journal of World-System Research. 2000. Vol. 6. N 3. P. 234–263.Martin W.G. Still partners and still dissident after all these years? Wallerstein, World revolutions and World-System perspective // Journal of World-System Research. 2000. Vol. 6. N 3. P. 234–263.Robinson W. Global capitalism and its anti-‘human face’: organic intellectuals and interpretations of the crisis // Globalizations. 2013. Vol. 10. N 5. P. 659–671.Robinson W. Global capitalism and its anti-‘human face’: organic intellectuals and interpretations of the crisis // Globalizations. 2013. Vol. 10. N 5. P. 659–671.Sklair L. Competing conceptions of globalization // Journal of World-Systems Research. 1999. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 143–162.Sklair L. Competing conceptions of globalization // Journal of World-Systems Research. 1999. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 143–162.Su T. Myth and mystery of globalization. World trade Networks in 1928, 1938, 1960 and 1999 // Review (Fernand Braudel Center). 2002. Vol. 25. N 4. P. 376–377.Su T. Myth and mystery of globalization. World trade Networks in 1928, 1938, 1960 and 1999 // Review (Fernand Braudel Center). 2002. Vol. 25. N 4. P. 376–377.Wallerstein I. Societal development, or development of the World-system? // International Sociology. 1986. Vol. 1. N 1. P. 3–17.Wallerstein I. Societal development, or development of the World-system? // International Sociology. 1986. Vol. 1. N 1. P. 3–17.Wallerstein I. The evolution of the modern World-system // Proto-Soziologie. 1995. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 4–10.Wallerstein I. The evolution of the modern World-system // Proto-Soziologie. 1995. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 4–10.Wallerstein I. Response: declining states, declining rights // International Labour and Working Class History. 1995. N 1. P. 24–27.Wallerstein I. Response: declining states, declining rights // International Labour and Working Class History. 1995. N 1. P. 24–27.Wallerstein I. Globalization or the age of transition? A long-term view of the trajectory of the World-system // International Sociology. 2000. Vol. 15. N 2. P. 249–265.Wallerstein I. Globalization or the age of transition? A long-term view of the trajectory of the World-system // International Sociology. 2000. Vol. 15. N 2. P. 249–265.Wallerstein I. Structural crises // New Left Review. 2010. March–Apr. Vol. II. N 62. P. 133–142.Wallerstein I. Structural crises // New Left Review. 2010. March–Apr. Vol. II. N 62. P. 133–142.Wallerstein I. Robinson’s critical appraisal appraised // International Sociology. 2013. Vol. 27. N 4. P. 524–528.Wallerstein I. Robinson’s critical appraisal appraised // International Sociology. 2013. Vol. 27. N 4. P. 524–528.Wallerstein I. States? Sovereignty? The dilemmas of capitalists in an age of transition. URL: http://www.binghamton.edu/fbc/archive/iwsovty.htm (accessed: 11.03.2015).Wallerstein I. States? Sovereignty? The dilemmas of capitalists in an age of transition. URL: http://www.binghamton.edu/fbc/archive/iwsovty.htm (accessed: 11.03.2015).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.