<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sociolpolitol</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1029-3736</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-8769</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-4-126-146</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sociolpolitol-329</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОЦИОЛОГИЯ РЕЛИГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>РЕЛИГИОЗНЫЙ ВОПРОС И СВЕТСКОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВО: КРИЗИС РЕГУЛЯЦИИ ПО Д. ЭРВЬЁ-ЛЕЖЕ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>RELIGIOUS QUESTION AND SECULAR STATE: CRISIS OF REGULATION BY DANI LE HERVIEU-L GER</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Трофимов</surname><given-names>С. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Trophimov</surname><given-names>S. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Трофимов Сергей Викторович, кандидат социологических наук, доцент кафедры современной социологии социологического факультета </p><p>Ленинские горы, д. 1. стр. 33, г. Москва, 119234</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Trophimov Sergey V., associate professor, chair of modern sociology, Faculty of Sociology</p><p>Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow, 119234</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">trophimov@socio.msu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>146</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Трофимов С.В., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Трофимов С.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Trophimov S.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/329">https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/329</self-uri><abstract><p>Предложенный доклад освещает предложенную французским социологом Даниэль Эрвьё-Леже концепцию Религиозного индивидуализма в условиях современного западного общества. Дается оценка религиозной ситуации во французском обществе конца XX в., приводятся примеры. Особое внимание уделено кризису светского регулирования религиозного в современном обществе. Материал предоставляется полезным для сравнительных исследований религиозной ситуации в России и западной Европе. Парадоксально, ослабление регулирующей способности религиозных институтов приводит к ослаблению светскости государства. Религиозные институты должны быть способными осуществлять режим утверждения истин веры, что делает институциональную власть последним гарантом истин веры, разделяемых всеми верующими этой конфессии. Проблемной становится принятая светским государством система “копирования” структур католической церкви XVIII в., которые не соответствуют не только религиозным организациям в целом, но и даже современным структурам организации Католической церкви во Франции. Современная институциональная дезорганизация на религиозном поле вносит вклад в дестабилизацию французской модели светскости, ослабленную политической культурной и экономической либерализацией, которые подрывают своими принципами ценности, на которых исторически основана сама светская система. Институциональный кризис утверждения истин веры благоприятствует увеличению числа систем верований отдельных общин. Проблему нельзя решить a priori, юридически разделив традиционные, «признанные» и прочие религии. В изменяющейся религиозной ситуации государство должно искать новую модель взаимодействия с религиозными организациями и группами. Материал предоставляется полезным для сравнительных исследований религиозной ситуации в России и западной Европе.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The proposed paper outlines concepts of the Religious individualism in modern Western society analyzed by the French sociologist Danièle Hervieu-Léger in “Religion in movement (1999)”. Author proposes an assessment of the religious situation in the French society at the end of the XX century and discuss some examples. Particular attention is given to crisis of secular regulation of the religious in the modern society. The weakening of the regulatory capacity of religious institutions leads to a weakening of the secular state. Religious institutions should be able to implement the regime of the truth of faith, which makes the institutional power of the superior guarantor of common faith principles shared by all believers of the denomination. The system of “copying” the structures of the Catholic Church of the XVIII century adopted by the secular state, today is not more correspond nor religious organizations in general, neither even the modern structures of the organization of the Catholic Church in France, that become a problem for a state-confessional relation. Modern institutional disorganization in the religious field, contributing to the destabilization of the French model of secularism, weakened by political cultural and economic liberalization that undermine its principles values that historically based secular system itself. Institutional crisis of the truths of faith approval favours an increase in the number of belief systems of individual communities. The problem can not be solved a priori, legally separating the traditional, “recognized by law” and other religions. The changing religious situation the state must find a new model of interaction with religious groups and organizations. The material is useful for comparative studies of the religious situation in Russia and Western Europe.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Даниэль Эрвьё-Леже</kwd><kwd>религия в движении</kwd><kwd>религиозный индивидуализм</kwd><kwd>светскость</kwd><kwd>современная религиозная ситуация</kwd><kwd>религиозные альтернативы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Danièle Hervieu-Léger</kwd><kwd>Religion in movement</kwd><kwd>modern religious situation</kwd><kwd>religious individualism</kwd><kwd>laicity</kwd><kwd>religious institutions</kwd><kwd>religious alternatives</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трофимов С.В. Индивидуализм и типы религиозных верующих в ранней теории Д. Эрвьё-Леже // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2014. № 4. С. 204–218.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Azria R. Juifs des villes, juifs des champs // Nouveaux Cahiers. 1998. N 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трофимов С.В. Особенности формирования современного религиозного индивидуализма по Д. Эрвьё-Леже // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2015. № 3. С. 130–138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baubérot J. La Laïcité, quel héritage? De 1789 à nos jours. Genève,1990.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baubérot J. Le protestantisme doit-il mourir? La différence protestante dans une France multicultttrelle. P., 1988.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baubérot J. Le protestantisme doit-il mourir? La différence protestante dans une France multicultttrelle. P., 1988.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Before the shooting begins. Searchingfor democracy in America’s culture war. N.Y., 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Before the shooting begins. Searchingfor democracy in America’s culture war. N.Y., 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Capitant H. Vocabulaire juridique. P., 1936.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Capitant H. Vocabulaire juridique. P., 1936.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Comité catholique français des religieux // Vie religieuse, érémitisme, consécration des vierges, communautés nouvelles. P., 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Comité catholique français des religieux // Vie religieuse, érémitisme, consécration des vierges, communautés nouvelles. P., 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gauchet M. Sécularisation, laïcité: sur la singularité du parcours français // Les Idées en mouvement. Mensuel de la Ligue de l’Enseignement. 1998. Avril. N 58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gauchet M. Sécularisation, laïcité: sur la singularité du parcours français // Les Idées en mouvement. Mensuel de la Ligue de l’Enseignement. 1998. Avril. N 58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gutwirth J. L’Eglise électronique. La saga des télévangélistes. P., 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gutwirth J. L’Eglise électronique. La saga des télévangélistes. P., 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hervieu-Léger D. De la mission à la protestation. P., 1973.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hervieu-Léger D. De la mission à la protestation. P., 1973.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hervieu-Léger D. Le pèlerin et converti. La religion en mouvement. P., 1999. ISBN: 978-2-0808-0017-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hervieu-Léger D. Le pèlerin et converti. La religion en mouvement. P., 1999. ISBN: 978-2-0808-0017-6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hunler J.D. Culture wars, the struggle to défine America. N.Y., 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hunler J.D. Culture wars, the struggle to défine America. N.Y., 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Isambert F.A. La sécularisation interne du christianisme // Revue française de sociologie. 1976. N 17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Isambert F.A. La sécularisation interne du christianisme // Revue française de sociologie. 1976. N 17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Langlois C. Permanence, renouveaux et affrontements (1830–1880) // Histoire des catholiques en France / Ed. by F. Lebrun. P., 1980. P. 321–406.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Langlois C. Permanence, renouveaux et affrontements (1830–1880) // Histoire des catholiques en France / Ed. by F. Lebrun. P., 1980. P. 321–406.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Le Bras G. Introduction à l’histoire de la pratique religieuse en France. Vol. II. P., 1945. P. 61–65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Le Bras G. Introduction à l’histoire de la pratique religieuse en France. Vol. II. P., 1945. P. 61–65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moto propio “Ecclesia Dei”. 1988.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moto propio “Ecclesia Dei”. 1988.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moto propio “Summorum Pontificum”. 2007. 14 Sent.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moto propio “Summorum Pontificum”. 2007. 14 Sent.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lieux de mémoire / Ed. by P. Nora. Vol. I. La République. P., 1984; Vol. II, III. La Nation. P., 1987.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lieux de mémoire / Ed. by P. Nora. Vol. I. La République. P., 1984; Vol. II, III. La Nation. P., 1987.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Palard J. Les recompositions territoriales de l’Eglise catholique, entre singularité et universalité. Territoire et centralisation // Archives de Sciences sociales des religions (à paraître).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Palard J. Les recompositions territoriales de l’Eglise catholique, entre singularité et universalité. Territoire et centralisation // Archives de Sciences sociales des religions (à paraître).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Poulat B. Liberté, laïcité. La guerre des deux France et le principe de la modernité. P., 1987.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Poulat B. Liberté, laïcité. La guerre des deux France et le principe de la modernité. P., 1987.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rémond R. Introduction à l’histoire de notre temps. Vol. 2. P., 1974. Rémond R. Le présent encombré par l’histoire // Le Monde. 1984. 3 mars. Saint-Blancat C. L’islam de la diaspora. P., 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rémond R. Introduction à l’histoire de notre temps. Vol. 2. P., 1974. Rémond R. Le présent encombré par l’histoire // Le Monde. 1984. 3 mars. Saint-Blancat C. L’islam de la diaspora. P., 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trofimov S.V. Individualizm i tipy religioznykh veruyushchikh v rannei teorii D. Erv’e-Lezhe [Individualism and types of religious believers in the early theory of D. Ervö-Leger] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2014. N 4. S. 204–218 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trofimov S.V. Individualizm i tipy religioznykh veruyushchikh v rannei teorii D. Erv’e-Lezhe [Individualism and types of religious believers in the early theory of D. Ervö-Leger] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2014. N 4. S. 204–218 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trofimov S.V. Osobennosti formirovaniya sovremennogo religioznogo individualizma po D. Erv’e-Lezhe [Features of the formation of modern religious individualism by D. Ervie-Leger] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2015. N 3. S. 130–138 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trofimov S.V. Osobennosti formirovaniya sovremennogo religioznogo individualizma po D. Erv’e-Lezhe [Features of the formation of modern religious individualism by D. Ervie-Leger] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2015. N 3. S. 130–138 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vandeputte B. Des Vierges divisent les diocèses // La Croix. 1996. 29 août. Willaime J.P. La Précarité protestante. Genève, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vandeputte B. Des Vierges divisent les diocèses // La Croix. 1996. 29 août. Willaime J.P. La Précarité protestante. Genève, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Winock M. Les combats de la laïcité // L’Histoire. 1989. Dec. N 128.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Winock M. Les combats de la laïcité // L’Histoire. 1989. Dec. N 128.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
