sociolpolitolВестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политологияMoscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science1029-37362541-8769Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-4-59-79sociolpolitol-469Research ArticleОБЩЕСТВО И ПРОЦЕСС СЕТЕВИЗАЦИИСообщества в эпоху интернетаCommunities in the age of internetДобринскаяД. Е.DobrinskayaD. E.

Д.Е. Добринская, канд. социол. наук, доц. кафедры современной социологии социологического факультета.

Ленинские горы, МГУ, д. 1. стр. 33, г. Москва, Российская Федерация, 119234.

Dobrinskaya Darya E., PhD in Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Sociology.

Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119234.

darya.dobrinskaya@gmail.comМГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова.РоссияLomonosov Moscow State University.Russian Federation2018110120192445979Copyright © Добринская Д.Е., 20192019Добринская Д.Е.Dobrinskaya D.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/469

Трансформационный потенциал интернет-технологий сегодня неоспорим. Это касается всех сфер общественной жизни, и это, безусловно, отражается на множестве социальных практик и социальных взаимодействий. В фокусе социологов находятся проблемы, которые так или иначе связаны с влиянием интернета на общество. Без внимания не остались и современные сообщества. Какова их природа, их формы и особенности функционирования? Речь идет о том, чтобы понять, являются ли современные сообщества принципиально новым типом социальных объединений или же интернет-технологии обеспечивают лишь дополнительные инструменты для продолжения взаимодействий, характерных для традиционных сообществ. В статье осуществлен историко-социологический анализ понятия “сообщество”. Особое внимание уделяется различным подходам к определению современных сообществ и их типов. Рассматривая интернет-пространство как новое социальное пространство и интернет как революционное средство коммуникации, предлагается осуществить анализ виртуальных сообществ с точки зрения наличия или отсутствия у этих сообществ альтернативных традиционным сообществам характеристик. В заключении делается вывод о том, что для современных сообществ характерны процессы гибридизации, под которыми подразумевается фактическое объединение свойств реальных и виртуальных сообществ.

The transformational potential of Internet technologies is undeniable today. This applies to all spheres of social life, and this, of course, affects a variety of social practices and social interactions. In the focus of sociologists there are problems that are somehow connected with the influence of the Internet on society. Modern communities are also under scrutiny. What is their nature, their forms and features of functioning? It’s about understanding whether modern communities are a fundamentally new type of social association or whether Internet technologies provide only additional tools for continuing the interactions that are characteristic of traditional communities. The article carries out the historical-sociological analysis of the concept of “community”. Various approaches to the definition of modern communities and their types are analyzed. Considering the Internet space as a new social space and the Internet as a revolutionary means of communication, it is proposed to carry out an analysis of virtual communities in terms of the presence or absence of characteristics in these communities that are alternative to traditional communities. The conclusion is made that the processes of hybridization are typical for modern communities, which implies the actual consolidation of the properties of real and virtual communities.

сообществовиртуальное сообществоинтернеткиберпространствосовременная социологическая теориягибридизацияcommunityvirtual communityInternetcyberspacemodern sociological theoryhybridizationReferencesАндерсон Б. Воображаемые сообщества. Размышления об истоках и распространении национализма. М., 2001.A dictionary of sociology / Ed. by J. Scott. Oxford, 2014.Артемова Т.С. Понятие “доступ” в социологической теории Джереми Рифкина // Социология. 2012. № 3. С. 84–96.Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism]. M., 2001 (in Russian).Бондаренко С.В. Социальная структура виртуальных сетевых сообществ. Ростов-н/Д., 2004.Artemova T.S. Ponyatie “dustup” v sotsiologicheskoi teorii Dzheremi Rifkina [Th e notion ‘access’ in the sociological theory by Jeremy Rifkin] // Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2012. N 3. S. 84–96 (in Russian).Вершинина И.А. Социологическая урбанистика: история и основные направления современных исследований // Современная социология: ключевые направления и векторы развития / Под общ. ред. Н.Г. Осиповой. М., 2018. С. 230–268.Bakardjieva M. Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective // Media, Culture & Society. 2003. Vol. 25. N 3. P. 291–313.Вирт Л. Урбанизм как образ жизни // Вирт Л. Избранные работы по социологии. М., 2005. С. 93–118.Bauman Z. Does ethics have a chance in a world of consumers? L., 2008.Добринская Д.Е. Киберпространство: территория современной жизни // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2018. Т. 24. № 1. С. 52–70.Baym N.K. Th e emergence of community in computer-mediated communication // CyberSociety / Ed. by S. Jones. Newbury Park, 1995. P. 138–163.Кастельс М. Галактика Интернет. Екатеринбург, 2004.Baym N.K. Personal connections in the digital age. Oxford; Boston, 2015.Кимелев Ю.А., Полякова Н.Л. Модерн и процесс индивидуализации: исторические судьбы индивида модерна. М., 2017.Blackshaw T. Key concepts in community studies. L., 2010.Ольденбург Р. Третье место: кафе, кофейни, книжные магазины, бары, салоны красоты и другие места “тусовок” как фундамент сообщества. М., 2014.Bondarenko S.V. Sotsial’naya struktura virtual’nykh setevykh soobshchestv [Social structure of virtual network communities]. Rostov-n/D., 2004 (in Russian).Осипова Н.Г. Западная социология в XX столетии: ключевые фигуры, направления и школы: Научная монография. М., 2018.Calhoun C.J. Dictionary of the social sciences. Oxford, 2002.Парк Р.Э. Организация сообщества и романтический характер // Социологическое обозрение. 2002. Т. 2. № 3. С. 13–18.Castells M. Galaktika Internet [Internet Galaxy]. Ekaterinburg, 2004 (in Russian).Парк Р.Э. Городское сообщество как пространственная конфигурация и моральный порядок // Социологическое обозрение. 2006. Т. 5. № 1. С. 11–18.Cavanagh A. Sociology in the age of the Internet. Maidenhead, 2007.Рейнгольд Г. Умная толпа: новая социальная революция. М., 2006.Cohen A.P. Th e symbolic construction of community. L., 1985.Российская социологическая энциклопедия / Под ред. Г.В. Осипова. М., 1998.Dobrinskaya D.E. Cyberspace: territory of contemporary life // Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2018. Vol. 24. N 1. P. 52–70. DOI:10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-52-70 (in Russian).Рыков Ю.Г. Структура социальных связей в виртуальных сообществах: сравнительный анализ онлайн-групп социальной сети “ВКонтакте”: дисс. … канд. социол. н., М., 2016.Fuchs C. Internet and society: social theory in the information age. N.Y., 2008.Теннис Ф. Общность и общество. Основные понятия чистой социологии. СПб., 2002.Giddens A., Sutton P.W. Essential concepts in sociology. Cambridge, 2017.Gruzd A., Jacobson J., Wellman B., Mai Ph. Understanding communities in an age of social media: the good, the bad, and the complicated // Information Communication and Society. 2016. Vol. 19. N 9. P. 1187–1193. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187195Gruzd A., Jacobson J., Wellman B., Mai Ph. Understanding communities in an age of social media: the good, the bad, and the complicated // Information Communication and Society. 2016. Vol. 19. N 9. P. 1187–1193. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187195Hampton K., Wellman B. Neighboring in Netville: how the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb // City and Community. 2003. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 277–311.Hampton K., Wellman B. Neighboring in Netville: how the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb // City and Community. 2003. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 277–311.Hampton K.N. Persistent and pervasive community: new communication technologies and the future of community // American Behavioral Scientist. 2016. Vol. 60. N 1. P. 1–24. DOI: 10.1177/0002764215601714Hampton K.N. Persistent and pervasive community: new communication technologies and the future of community // American Behavioral Scientist. 2016. Vol. 60. N 1. P. 1–24. DOI: 10.1177/0002764215601714Hillery G.A. Definitions of community: areas of agreement // Rural Sociology. 1955. N 20. С. 111–123.Hillery G.A. Definitions of community: areas of agreement // Rural Sociology. 1955. N 20. С. 111–123.Katz J.E., Rice R.E., Acord S., Dasgupta K., David K. Personal mediated communication and the concept of community in theory and practice // Communication and community. Communication yearbook. Vol. 28 / Ed. by P. Kalbfleisch. Mahwah, 2004. P. 315–371.Katz J.E., Rice R.E., Acord S., Dasgupta K., David K. Personal mediated communication and the concept of community in theory and practice // Communication and community. Communication yearbook. Vol. 28 / Ed. by P. Kalbfleisch. Mahwah, 2004. P. 315–371.Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Modern i protsess individualizatsii: istoricheskie sud’by individa moderna [Modernity and the process of individualization: the historical destinies of the modern individual]. M., 2017 (in Russian).Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Modern i protsess individualizatsii: istoricheskie sud’by individa moderna [Modernity and the process of individualization: the historical destinies of the modern individual]. M., 2017 (in Russian).Kollock P. Th e economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in cyberspace // Communities in Cyberspace / Ed. by P. Kollock, M. Smith. N.Y., 1999. P. 220–242.Kollock P. Th e economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in cyberspace // Communities in Cyberspace / Ed. by P. Kollock, M. Smith. N.Y., 1999. P. 220–242.Licklider J.C.R., Taylor R.W. Th e computer as a communication device // Reprinted from Science and Technology. 1968. Vol. 76.Licklider J.C.R., Taylor R.W. Th e computer as a communication device // Reprinted from Science and Technology. 1968. Vol. 76.Matzat U. Cooperation and community on the Internet: past issues and present perspectives for theoretical-empirical Internet research // Analyse & Kritik. 2004. Vol. 26. N 1. P. 63–90.Matzat U. Cooperation and community on the Internet: past issues and present perspectives for theoretical-empirical Internet research // Analyse & Kritik. 2004. Vol. 26. N 1. P. 63–90.Oldenburg R. Tret’e mesto: kafe, kofeini, knizhnye magaziny, bary, salony krasoty i drugie mesta “tusovok” kak fundament soobshchestva [Th e Great Good Place]. M., 2014 (in Russian).Oldenburg R. Tret’e mesto: kafe, kofeini, knizhnye magaziny, bary, salony krasoty i drugie mesta “tusovok” kak fundament soobshchestva [Th e Great Good Place]. M., 2014 (in Russian).Osipova N.G. Zapadnaya sotsiologiya v XX stoletii: klyuchevye figury, napravleniya i shkoly: nauchnaya monografiya [Western sociology in the twentieth century: key figures, trends and schools: a scientific monograph]. M., 2018 (in Russian).Osipova N.G. Zapadnaya sotsiologiya v XX stoletii: klyuchevye figury, napravleniya i shkoly: nauchnaya monografiya [Western sociology in the twentieth century: key figures, trends and schools: a scientific monograph]. M., 2018 (in Russian).Park R.E. Gorodskoe soobshchestvo kak prostranstvennaya konfiguratsiya i moral’nyi poryadok [Th e Urban Community as a Spatial Pattern and a Moral Order] // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review]. 2006. Vol. 5. N 1. P. 11–18 (in Russian).Park R.E. Gorodskoe soobshchestvo kak prostranstvennaya konfiguratsiya i moral’nyi poryadok [Th e Urban Community as a Spatial Pattern and a Moral Order] // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review]. 2006. Vol. 5. N 1. P. 11–18 (in Russian).Park R.E. Organizatsiya soobshchestva i romanticheskii kharakter [Community Organization and the Romantic Temper] // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review]. 2002. Vol. 2. N 3. P. 13–18 (in Russian).Park R.E. Organizatsiya soobshchestva i romanticheskii kharakter [Community Organization and the Romantic Temper] // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review]. 2002. Vol. 2. N 3. P. 13–18 (in Russian).Pentzold C. Imagining the Wikipedia community: what do Wikipedia authors mean when they write about their “community”? // New Media and Society. 2011. Vol. 13. N 5. P. 704–721. DOI: 10.1177/1461444810378364Pentzold C. Imagining the Wikipedia community: what do Wikipedia authors mean when they write about their “community”? // New Media and Society. 2011. Vol. 13. N 5. P. 704–721. DOI: 10.1177/1461444810378364Rheingold H. Th e virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, 2000.Rheingold H. Th e virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, 2000.Rheingold H. Umnaya tolpa: novaya sotsial’naya revolyutsiya [Smart mobs: the next social revolution]. M., 2006 (in Russian).Rheingold H. Umnaya tolpa: novaya sotsial’naya revolyutsiya [Smart mobs: the next social revolution]. M., 2006 (in Russian).Rossiiskaya sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya [Russian sociological Encyclopedia] / Pod red. G.V. Osipova. M., 1998 (in Russian).Rossiiskaya sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya [Russian sociological Encyclopedia] / Pod red. G.V. Osipova. M., 1998 (in Russian).Rykov Yu.G. Struktura sotsial’nykh svyazei v virtual’nykh soobshchestvakh: sravnitel’nyi analiz onlain-grupp sotsial’noi seti “VKontakte” [Th e structure of social relations in virtual communities: a comparative analysis of online groups of social network “VKontakte”]: diss. … kand. sots. n., M., 2016 (in Russian).Rykov Yu.G. Struktura sotsial’nykh svyazei v virtual’nykh soobshchestvakh: sravnitel’nyi analiz onlain-grupp sotsial’noi seti “VKontakte” [Th e structure of social relations in virtual communities: a comparative analysis of online groups of social network “VKontakte”]: diss. … kand. sots. n., M., 2016 (in Russian).Steinkuehler C.A., Williams D. Where everybody knows your (Screen) name: online games as “third places” // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006. Vol. 11. P. 885–909.Steinkuehler C.A., Williams D. Where everybody knows your (Screen) name: online games as “third places” // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006. Vol. 11. P. 885–909.Tennis F. Obshchnost’ i obshchestvo. Osnovnye ponyatiya chistoi sotsiologii [Community and Society]. SPb., 2002 (in Russian).Tennis F. Obshchnost’ i obshchestvo. Osnovnye ponyatiya chistoi sotsiologii [Community and Society]. SPb., 2002 (in Russian).Vershinina I.A. Sotsiologicheskaya urbanistika: istoriya i osnovnye napravleniya sovremennykh issledovanii [Sociologocal urban studies: history ank modern key research trends] / Sovremennaya sotsiologiya: klyuchevye napravleniya i vektory razvitiya [Modern sociology: key trends and development vectors] / Pod obshch. red. N.G. Osipovoi. M., 2018. S. 230–268 (in Russian).Vershinina I.A. Sotsiologicheskaya urbanistika: istoriya i osnovnye napravleniya sovremennykh issledovanii [Sociologocal urban studies: history ank modern key research trends] / Sovremennaya sotsiologiya: klyuchevye napravleniya i vektory razvitiya [Modern sociology: key trends and development vectors] / Pod obshch. red. N.G. Osipovoi. M., 2018. S. 230–268 (in Russian).Wellman B. Physical place and cyberplace: the rise of personalized networking // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2001. Vol. 25. N 2. P. 227–252.Wellman B. Physical place and cyberplace: the rise of personalized networking // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2001. Vol. 25. N 2. P. 227–252.Wellman B., Carrington P.J., Hall A. Networks as personal communities // Social Structures: A Network Approach / Ed. by B. Wellman, S.D. Berkowitz. Cambridge, 1988. P. 130–184.Wellman B., Carrington P.J., Hall A. Networks as personal communities // Social Structures: A Network Approach / Ed. by B. Wellman, S.D. Berkowitz. Cambridge, 1988. P. 130–184.Wellman B., Gulia M. Virtual communities as communities. Net surfers don’t ride alone // Communities in Cyberspace / Ed. by M.A. Smith, P. Kollock. Abingdon; N.Y., 1999. P. 167–194.Wellman B., Gulia M. Virtual communities as communities. Net surfers don’t ride alone // Communities in Cyberspace / Ed. by M.A. Smith, P. Kollock. Abingdon; N.Y., 1999. P. 167–194.Wellman B., Hampton K. Living networked on and offline // Contemporary Sociology. 1999. Vol. 28. N 6. P. 648–654.Wellman B., Hampton K. Living networked on and offline // Contemporary Sociology. 1999. Vol. 28. N 6. P. 648–654.Williams R. Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. N.Y., 1985.Williams R. Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. N.Y., 1985.Wirth L. Urbanizm kak obraz zhizni [Urbanism as a way of life] // Wirth L. Izbrannye raboty po sotsiologii. M., 2005. S. 93–118. M., 2005. S. 93–118 (in Russian).Wirth L. Urbanizm kak obraz zhizni [Urbanism as a way of life] // Wirth L. Izbrannye raboty po sotsiologii. M., 2005. S. 93–118. M., 2005. S. 93–118 (in Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.