<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sociolpolitol</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1029-3736</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-8769</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-1-130-144</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sociolpolitol-531</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕОРИЯ, МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ СОЦИОЛОГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORY, METHODOLOGY AND HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Трансформации публичной сферы как отражение процесса индивидуализации</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The public sphere transformation as a reflection of the individualization process</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Баценкова</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Batsenkova</surname><given-names>Antonina A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Баценкова Антонина Александровна, асп. кафедры современной социологии социологического факультета МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</p><p>Ленинские горы, 1, стр. 33, Москва, Российская Федерация, 119234</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Postgraduate Student of the Department of Contemporary sociology, The Faculty of Sociology</p><p>Leninsky Gory, 1-33, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119234</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">batonal@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>04</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>130</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Баценкова А.А., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Баценкова А.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Batsenkova A.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/531">https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/531</self-uri><abstract><p>Индивидуализация — это процесс дистанцирования и высвобождения индивида от любых форм коллективностей: коллективного сознания, традиций, традиционной групповой принадлежности — и обретение индивидом собственных, специфических, только ему присущих характеристик1. Индивидуализация как историко-социологическая категория обладает различными формами своего проявления. Одним из аспектов процесса индивидуализации является детрадиционализация жизненных сфер и возникновение новых “пространств свободы”, которые порождают новые вызовы для общества и для индивида2. Для общества таким вызовом является падение значимости социальных институтов индустриального общества как традиционных ориентиров “жизненных стратегий и жизненных ситуаций”. Возникают, так называемые “институты-пустышки”3, которые сохраняют внешнюю форму, но перестают выполнять характерные для них задачи и меняют свое содержательное значение.Процесс индивидуализации затронул все сферы жизни общества, в том числе и публичную сферу. В социологической традиции теме изменения и упадка публичной сферы посвящены работы Дж. Дьюи4, Ю. Хабермаса5, Х. Арендт6, Р. Сеннета7, У. Липмана8 и др. Исследователи говорят о кризисе публичного пространства в современном западном обществе. Он связан со смешением публичной и приватной жизни, рассмотрением публичной сферы через призму личных интересов и ее описанием в категориях интимности. “Люди очень личностно относятся к общественным делам, распоряжаться которыми надлежащим образом можно лишь с безличными, в терминах личных ощущений”9. Общество приобретает значимость для индивида как психологическая система10.Цель статьи — показать падение публичной сферы как отражение процесса индивидуализации. Если изначально публичное пространство формировалось под влиянием средств массовой информации, политико-правовых и государственных систем, то в XXI в. публичная сфера становится пространством выражения индивидуальной свободы и независимости через блогосферу, видео-порталы и социальные сети. С развитием глобальных сетей коммуникации и цифровых технологий возникает необходимость пересмотра концепта публичной сферы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Individualization is the process of distancing and relief an individual from any form of collectivities: collective consciousness, traditions, traditional group membership — and obtaining own, specific, only inherent characteristics by individual. Individualization as a historical and sociological category has various forms of its manifestation. One of the aspects of the individualization process is the detraditionalization of life spheres and the emergence of new “spaces of freedom”, which give rise to new challenges for society and for the individual. The such a challenge for society is the drop of the social institutions importance as traditional guidelines for “life strategies and life situations”. There are so — called “phantom institutions” that keep their external form but stop performing their tasks and change their meaning.The individualization process has affected all spheres of society, including the public sphere. In the sociological tradition, the theme of change and decline of the public sphere is devoted to the work of J. Dewey, J. Habermas, H. Arendt, R. Sennett, W. Lippmann, etc. Researchers say about the public sphere crisis in modern Western society. It is associated with the fusion of public and private life, the consideration of the public sphere through personal interests and its description in the categories of intimacy. People treat to public affairs too personally, which can be properly managed only with the impersonal, in terms of personal feelings. Society becomes important for the individual as a psychological system.The purpose of this paper is to show the fall of the public sphere as a reflection of the individualization process. If initially the public space was formed under the impact of mass media, political and legal systems and state systems, in the XXI century the public sphere becomes a space of expression of individual freedom and independence through the blogosphere, video portals and social networks. It is necessary to revise the concept of the public sphere because of the global communication networks development and the development of digital technologies.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>индивидуализация</kwd><kwd>индивид</kwd><kwd>модерн</kwd><kwd>публичная сфера</kwd><kwd>“общество интимности”</kwd><kwd>сетевой индивидуализм</kwd><kwd>сетевой индивидуум</kwd><kwd>персонализация</kwd><kwd>частная жизнь</kwd><kwd>приватность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>individualization</kwd><kwd>individual</kwd><kwd>modern</kwd><kwd>modernism</kwd><kwd>public sphere</kwd><kwd>the society of intimacy</kwd><kwd>network individualism</kwd><kwd>network individual</kwd><kwd>personalization</kwd><kwd>private life</kwd><kwd>privacy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Арендт Х. Vita activa, или о деятельной жизни / Под ред. Д.М. Носова. СПб., 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arendt H. Vita activa, ili o deyatel’noj zhizni [Vita active or The Human Condition] / Pod red. D.M. Nosova. SPb., 2000 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бек У. Общества риска. На пути к другому модерну. М., 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bek U. Obshchestva riska. Na puti k drugomu modern [Risk Society. On the way to another modernity]. M., 2000 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гидденс Э. Ускользающий мир. Как глобализация меняет нашу жизнь. М., 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Benhabib S. The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дьюи Дж. Общество и его проблемы. М., 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Benkler Y. The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кастельс М. Галактика Интернет: размышления об Интернете, бизнесе и обществе /Под ред. В. Харитонова. Екатеринбург, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Calhoun C. Introduction // Habermas and the Public Sphere / Ed. by C. Calhoun. Cambridge, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кимелев Ю.А., Полякова Н.Л. Модерн и процесс индивидуализации: исторические судьбы индивида модерна. М., 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">D’yui Dzh. Obshchestvo i ego problem [The society and its problems]. M., 2002 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кимелев Ю.А., Полякова Н.Л. Социально-исторический процесс индивидуализации и социальные механизмы его реализации. Часть I. Дифференциация и рационализация // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2018. Т. 24. No 1. С. 5–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ehtling B., Aleksanyan K., Kelli Dzh., Faris R., Palfri Dzh., Gasser U. Publichnyj diskurs v rossijskoj blogosfere: analiz politiki i mobilizacii v Runete // Issledovaniya Centra Berkmana 2010. Okt. N 11. URL: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber. law.harvard.edu/files/Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_Blogosphere RUSSIAN. pdf (accessed: 20.10.2013) (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Липовецки Ж. Эра пустоты. Эссе о современном индивидуализме. СПб., 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault M. Technologies of self // Technologies of Self: Seminar with Michel Foucault. L., 1988. P. 16–49.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов А.В. Блоги: новая сфера влияния. М., 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault M. Govern mentality // The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental rationality. Hemel Hempstead, 1991. P. 87–104.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сеннет Р. Падение публичного человека. М., 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fraser N. et al. Transnationalizing the public sphere. Cambridge; Malden, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сеннет Р. Плоть и камень. Тело и город в западной цивилизации. М., 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giddens E.H. Uskol’zayushchij mir. Kak globalizaciya menyaet nashu zhizn’ [Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives]. M., 2004 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сироткина И.Е., Смит Р. Психологическое общество и социально-политические перемены в России // Методология и история психологии. 2008. Т. 3. Вып. 3. С. 73–90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas Yu. Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoj sfery. Issledovaniya otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva [The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere]. M., 2016 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хабермас Ю. Структурное изменение публичной сферы. Исследования относительно категории буржуазного общества. М., 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Howe J. Big Boss is watching you. Yaho! // Internet Life. 2000. Oct. P. 105–107.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Этлинг Б., Алексанян К., Келли Дж., Фарис Р., Палфри Дж., Гассер У. Публичный дискурс в российской блогосфере: анализ политики и мобилизации в Рунете // Исследования Центра Беркмана. 2010. Окт. No 11. URL: http://cyber.law. harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Public_Discourse_in_the_Russian_ Blogosphere RUSSIAN.pdf (дата обращения: 20.10.2013).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kastel’s M. Galaktika Internet: razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve [The Internet Galaxy, Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society] / Pod red. V. Haritonova. Ekaterinburg, 2004 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Юдин Г.Б. Рецензия на книгу: Хабермас Ю. Структурная трансформация публичной сферы: исследования относительно категории буржуазного общества (2016) // Философия. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2017. Т. I. No 1. С. 123–133.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Modern i process individualizaciy: istoricheskie sud’by individa moderna. M., 2017 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Social’no-istoricheskij process individualizacii i social’nye mekhanizmy ego realizacii. Chast’ I. Differenciaciya i racionalizaciya. // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. 2018. T. 24. N 1. S. 5–33 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Social’no-istoricheskij process individualizacii i social’nye mekhanizmy ego realizacii. Chast’ I. Differenciaciya i racionalizaciya. // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. 2018. T. 24. N 1. S. 5–33 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lash C. The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. L., 1980.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lash C. The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. L., 1980.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lessing L. Code and other laws of cyberspace. N.Y., 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lessing L. Code and other laws of cyberspace. N.Y., 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lipovetsky Zh. Era pustoty. Esse o sovremennom individualizme [Era of emptiness. Essays on contemporary individualism]. SPb., 2001 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipovetsky Zh. Era pustoty. Esse o sovremennom individualizme [Era of emptiness. Essays on contemporary individualism]. SPb., 2001 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lippmann W. The Phantom public. N.Y., 1925.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lippmann W. The Phantom public. N.Y., 1925.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Negt O., Kluge A. Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung. Zur Organisations analys evon bürgerlicher und proletarischer Öffentlichkeit [in German]. Frankfurt a/M., 1972.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Negt O., Kluge A. Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung. Zur Organisations analys evon bürgerlicher und proletarischer Öffentlichkeit [in German]. Frankfurt a/M., 1972.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popov A.V. Blogi: novaya sfera vliyaniya. M., 2008 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov A.V. Blogi: novaya sfera vliyaniya. M., 2008 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rieff P. The triumph of the therapeutic: uses of faith after Freud. Chicago, 1978.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rieff P. The triumph of the therapeutic: uses of faith after Freud. Chicago, 1978.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N. The psychological complex: psychology, politics and society in England, 1969–1939. L., 1985.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N. The psychological complex: psychology, politics and society in England, 1969–1939. L., 1985.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. L., 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. L., 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sennet R. Padenie publichnogo cheloveka [The Fall of public man]. M., 2002 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sennet R. Padenie publichnogo cheloveka [The Fall of public man]. M., 2002 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sennet R. Plot’ i kamen’. Telo i gorod v zapadnoj civilizacii [The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism]. M., 2016 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sennet R. Plot’ i kamen’. Telo i gorod v zapadnoj civilizacii [The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism]. M., 2016 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sirotkina I.E., Smit R. Psihologicheskoe obshchestvo i social’no-politicheskie peremeny v Rossii // Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii. 2008. 3. Vyp. 3. P. 73–90 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sirotkina I.E., Smit R. Psihologicheskoe obshchestvo i social’no-politicheskie peremeny v Rossii // Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii. 2008. 3. Vyp. 3. P. 73–90 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith R. The Norton history of the human sciences. N.Y., 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith R. The Norton history of the human sciences. N.Y., 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sunstein C.R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sunstein C.R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wellman B. et al. The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2003. April. Vol. 8. N 3. Young I.M. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wellman B. et al. The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2003. April. Vol. 8. N 3. Young I.M. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yudin G.B. Recenziya na knigu: Habermas Yu. Strukturnaya transformaciya publichnoj sfery: Issledovaniya otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva (2016) // Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2017. T. I. N 1. S. 123–133 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yudin G.B. Recenziya na knigu: Habermas Yu. Strukturnaya transformaciya publichnoj sfery: Issledovaniya otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva (2016) // Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2017. T. I. N 1. S. 123–133 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
