<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sociolpolitol</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1029-3736</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-8769</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-36-48</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sociolpolitol-584</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕОРИЯ, МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ СОЦИОЛОГИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORY, METHODOLOGY AND HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Концепция мегалополиса Жана Готтмана</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Jan Gottman’s concept of megalopolis</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Вершинина</surname><given-names>И. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Vershinina</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Вершинина Инна Альфредовна, кандидат социологических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры современной социологии социологического факультета</p><p>Ленинские горы, 1, стр. 33, г. Москва, 119234</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vershinina Inna A., PhD Sci., Associate Professor, Department of Contemporary Sociology, Faculty of Sociology</p><p>Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119234</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">urbansociology@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>10</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Вершинина И.А., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Вершинина И.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Vershinina I.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/584">https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/584</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматривается концепция мегалополиса франко-американского ученого Жана Готтмана, который фиксирует в середине ХХ в. начало нового этапа урбанизации, характеризующегося формированием обширных урбанистических регионов. Основой для концепции мегалополиса становится “региональная иконография”, согласно которой границы являются символическим образованием, формирующимся под влиянием культуры и образа жизни. Развитие информационных и коммуникационных технологий, по мнению Ж. Готтмана, меняет повседневную жизнь людей, в частности, упрощает перемещение на большие расстояния, что и делает возможным формирование мегалополиса. В центре внимания исследователя находится урбанизированный район северо-восточного побережья Соединенных Штатов, который охватывает территорию от Бостона до Вашингтона. Это скопление городских агломераций Ж. Готтман и называет мегалополисом, в котором стираются различия между городской и сельской местностью. Мегалополисы называются одной из главных форм урбанизации конца ХХ в. и рассматриваются как результат становления постиндустриального общества, в котором растет доля людей, занятых в сервисном секторе, активно участвующих в процессе субурбанизации. Одной из главных проблем называется отсутствие эффективного управления мегалополисами, поскольку принятие решений и их реализация требуют согласованных действий со стороны органов власти нескольких административно-территориальных единиц. Тем не менее, городское планирование должно быть постепенно вытеснено планированием региональным, так как именно оно соответствует тенденциям урбанизации, зафиксированным во второй половине ХХ столетия. Идеи Готтмана о формировании урбанизированных регионов впоследствии получают свое продолжение, например, в работах исследователей Лос-Анджелесской школы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with Jean Gottmann’s concept of the megalopolis. In the middle of the twentieth century Gottmann fixed the beginning of a new stage of urbanization, which is characterized by the formation of vast urban regions. “Regional iconography” is the basis for his concept of the megalopolis. According to “regional iconography” borders are formed under the influence of culture and lifestyle, and so they are symbolic entities. The development of information and communication technologies, according to Gottmann, changes the daily lives of people, in particular, simplifies moving over long distances, which makes the formation of a megalopolis possible. The researcher focuses on the urbanized region of the northeast coast of the United States, which covers the territory from Boston to Washington. This urbanized region without significant differences between urban and rural areas is called “megalopolis” by Gottmann. Megalopolises, according to Gottmann, are one of the leading forms of urbanization of the 20th century and are considered as the result of the formation of a post-industrial society, with an increasing number of people employed in the service sector who are actively involved in the suburbanization process. One of the main problems is the lack of megalopolises’ effective management, because decision-making requires combined actions from the authorities of several administrative-territorial units. Nevertheless, city planning should be gradually superseded by regional planning, since it corresponds to the urbanization trends fixed in the second half of the 20th century. Gottmann’s ideas on the formation of urbanized regions become common, their continuation are the works of researchers at the Los Angeles School, for example.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Жан Готтман</kwd><kwd>региональная иконография</kwd><kwd>границы</kwd><kwd>циркуляция</kwd><kwd>мегалополис</kwd><kwd>субурбанизация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Jean Gottmann</kwd><kwd>regional iconography</kwd><kwd>borders</kwd><kwd>circulation</kwd><kwd>megalopolis</kwd><kwd>suburbanization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вершинина И.А. Понятийный аппарат социологической урбанистики: критический анализ // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2015. № 2. С. 75–85. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2015-0-2-75-85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baigent E. Patrick Geddes, Lewis Mumford and Jean Gottmann: divisions over “megalopolis”// Progress in Human Geography. 2004. Vol. 28. N 6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вершинина И.А. Коннектография Парага Ханны: сети городов в XXI веке // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 44. С. 147–154. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/44/15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Corey K.E. Jean Gottmann, 1915–1994 // Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1995. Vol. 85. N 2. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01799.xa.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вершинина И.А., Полякова Н.Л. Теоретические и методологические проблемы современной социологической урбанистики // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2013. № 4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Geddes P. Cities in evolution: an introduction to the town-planning movement and the study of cities. L., 1915.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. De la méthode d’analyse en géographie humaine // Annales de Géographie. 1947. N 301.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. De la méthode d’analyse en géographie humaine // Annales de Géographie. 1947. N 301.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. Geography and international relations // World Politics. 1951. Vol. 3. N 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. Geography and international relations // World Politics. 1951. Vol. 3. N 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. La politique des Etats et leur géographie. P., 1952 (a).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. La politique des Etats et leur géographie. P., 1952 (a).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. The political partitioning of our world: an attempt at analysis // World Politics. 1952. Vol. 4. N 4. DOI:10.2307/2008963 (b).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. The political partitioning of our world: an attempt at analysis // World Politics. 1952. Vol. 4. N 4. DOI:10.2307/2008963 (b).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. Megalopolis or the urbanization of the Northeastern Seaboard // Economic Geography. 1957. Vol. 33. N 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. Megalopolis or the urbanization of the Northeastern Seaboard // Economic Geography. 1957. Vol. 33. N 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. Megalopolis: the urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. N.Y., 1961.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. Megalopolis: the urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. N.Y., 1961.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. Géographie politique // Géographie Générale. Collection Encyclopédie de la Pléiade. Vol. 20. P., 1966.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. Géographie politique // Géographie Générale. Collection Encyclopédie de la Pléiade. Vol. 20. P., 1966.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. The significance of territory. Charlottesville, 1973.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. The significance of territory. Charlottesville, 1973.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. The evolution of the concept of territory // Social Science Information. 1975. Vol. 14. N 3/4. DOI: 10.1177/053901847501400302.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. The evolution of the concept of territory // Social Science Information. 1975. Vol. 14. N 3/4. DOI: 10.1177/053901847501400302.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. Spatial partitioning and the politician’s wisdom // International Political Science Review. 1980. Vol. 1. N 4. DOI: 10.1177/019251218000100402.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. Spatial partitioning and the politician’s wisdom // International Political Science Review. 1980. Vol. 1. N 4. DOI: 10.1177/019251218000100402.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. Space, freedom, and stability // International Political Science Review. 1984. Vol. 5. N 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. Space, freedom, and stability // International Political Science Review. 1984. Vol. 5. N 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gottmann J. Beyond megalopolis. Tokyo, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gottmann J. Beyond megalopolis. Tokyo, 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lyons R.D. Jean Gottman, 78, a geographer who saw a Northeast megalopolis. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/02/obituaries/jean-gottman-78-a-geogra-pher-who-saw-a-northeast-megalopolis.html (accessed: 15.01.2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lyons R.D. Jean Gottman, 78, a geographer who saw a Northeast megalopolis. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/1994/03/02/obituaries/jean-gottman-78-a-geogra-pher-who-saw-a-northeast-megalopolis.html (accessed: 15.01.2019).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mumford L. The culture of cities. San Diego; N.Y.; L., 1970.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mumford L. The culture of cities. San Diego; N.Y.; L., 1970.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mumford L. The city in history: its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. San Diego; N.Y.; L.; 1989.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mumford L. The city in history: its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. San Diego; N.Y.; L.; 1989.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Muscarà L. Territory as a psychosomatic device: Gottmann’s kinetic political geography // Geopolitics. 2005. Vol. 10. N 1. DOI: 10.1080/14650040590907721.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muscarà L. Territory as a psychosomatic device: Gottmann’s kinetic political geography // Geopolitics. 2005. Vol. 10. N 1. DOI: 10.1080/14650040590907721.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sassen S. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton; Oxford, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sassen S. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton; Oxford, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simmel G. The sociology of space // Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings / Ed. by D. Frisby, M. Featherstone. L.; Thousand Oaks, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simmel G. The sociology of space // Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings / Ed. by D. Frisby, M. Featherstone. L.; Thousand Oaks, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vershinina I.A. Ponyatijnyj apparat sociologicheskoj urbanistiki: kriticheskij analiz [The key concepts of urban sociology: a critical analysis] // Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2015. N 2. Р. 75–85. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2015-0-2-75-85 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vershinina I.A. Ponyatijnyj apparat sociologicheskoj urbanistiki: kriticheskij analiz [The key concepts of urban sociology: a critical analysis] // Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2015. N 2. Р. 75–85. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2015-0-2-75-85 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vershinina I.A. Konnektografiya Paraga Hanny: seti gorodov v XXI veke [Parag Khanna’s Connectography: Urban Networks in the 21st Century] // Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya. 2018. N 44. P. 147–154. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/44/15 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vershinina I.A. Konnektografiya Paraga Hanny: seti gorodov v XXI veke [Parag Khanna’s Connectography: Urban Networks in the 21st Century] // Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya. 2018. N 44. P. 147–154. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/44/15 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vershinina I.A., Polyakova N.L. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoj sociologicheskoj urbanistiki [Theoretical and methodological problems of contemporary urban sociology] // Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2013. N 4. Р. 60–84 (in Russian).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vershinina I.A., Polyakova N.L. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoj sociologicheskoj urbanistiki [Theoretical and methodological problems of contemporary urban sociology] // Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2013. N 4. Р. 60–84 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
