sociolpolitolВестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политологияMoscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science1029-37362541-8769Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-122-152sociolpolitol-678Research ArticleПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ СОЦИОЛОГИЯPOLITICAL SOCIOLOGYМетодологический статус времени в политической наукеMethodological status of time in political scienceШеблоО. Д.ShebloO. D.

Шебло Олеся Дмитриевна - канд. полит. наук, докт.

1-5-1 Меджиро, Тошима-ку, Токио,  171-8588

Sheblo Olesya D., Ph.D. (Political Science), PhD Student

1-5-1 Medzhiro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 171-8588

sheblo.olesya@gmail.comУниверситет ГакусюинЯпонияGakushuin UniversityJapan202024062020261122152Copyright © Шебло О.Д., 20202020Шебло О.Д.Sheblo O.D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/678

В современной политической науке время все более становится концептом-портманто. Оно входит в состав терминологических конкатенаций в самых различных сферах прикладных и теоретических исследований. Вместе с тем, методологический статус времени остается почти не изученым вопросом в политологии. Автор предлагает систематизацию тех исследований в политической науке, в которых время представлено как значимый фактор политического процесса. Было выделено четыре подхода, исходя из анализа их теоретического обоснования, методологии и практического инструментария: структуралистский, психологический, институциональный и циклическовременной подходы. Предложенная последовательность подходов основана на степени интенциональности субъектов политического интереса в их обращении со временем: от наиболее к наименее осознанному порядку.

In contemporary political science time is becoming a portmanteau-concept. It forms terminological concatenations in all fields of theoretical and applied researches. At the same time methodological status of time in political science is still not clear. Author suggests a systematization of those researches there time is viewed as a meaningful factor in political process. On the analysis of theoretical basis, methodology and tools four approaches are introduced: narrative approach, psychological approach, institutionalist approach and cyclic approach. The order of introduction of these approaches is based on the degree of intentionality of political actors in their treatment of time: from the most to the least conscious end.

темпоральные исследованиянарратив политического временитемпоральные перцепции политических актороввремя как институциональное ограничениетеории политических цикловtemporal researchesnarrative of political timetemporal perceptions of political actorstime as institutional constrainttheories of political cyclesReferencesAminzade R. Historical sociology and time // Sociological Methods & Research. 1992. May. Vol. 20 (4). P. 456–480.Aminzade R. Historical sociology and time // Sociological Methods & Research. 1992. May. Vol. 20 (4). P. 456–480.Ancona D.G., Okhuysen G.A., Perlow L.A. Taking time to integrate temporal research // The Academy of Management Review. 2001. Oct. Vol. 26 (4). P. 512–529.Ancona D.G., Okhuysen G.A., Perlow L.A. Taking time to integrate temporal research // The Academy of Management Review. 2001. Oct. Vol. 26 (4). P. 512–529.Bachelard G. The dialectic of duration. Manchester, 2000.Bachelard G. The dialectic of duration. Manchester, 2000.Barkin J.S. Time horizons and multilateral enforcement in international cooperation // International Studies Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 48. P. 363–382.Barkin J.S. Time horizons and multilateral enforcement in international cooperation // International Studies Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 48. P. 363–382.Beck N. Elections and the Fed: is there a political monetary cycle? // American Journal of Political Science. 1987. Febr. Vol. 31 (1). P. 194–216.Beck N. Elections and the Fed: is there a political monetary cycle? // American Journal of Political Science. 1987. Febr. Vol. 31 (1). P. 194–216.Beck N. The illusion of cycles in international relations // International Studies Quarterly. 1991. Dec. Vol. 35 (4). P. 455–476.Beck N. The illusion of cycles in international relations // International Studies Quarterly. 1991. Dec. Vol. 35 (4). P. 455–476.Bergson H. Time and free will. Sydney, 1913.Bergson H. Time and free will. Sydney, 1913.Braudel F. Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue duree // Annales: Economies, Societes, Civilisations. 1958. N 4. P. 725–753.Braudel F. Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue duree // Annales: Economies, Societes, Civilisations. 1958. N 4. P. 725–753.Crossan M., Pina e Cunha M., Vera D., Cunha J. Time and organizational improvisation // The Academy of Management Review. 2005. Jan. Vol. 30 (1). P. 129–145.Crossan M., Pina e Cunha M., Vera D., Cunha J. Time and organizational improvisation // The Academy of Management Review. 2005. Jan. Vol. 30 (1). P. 129–145.Elias N. Time: an essay. Oxford, 1992.Elias N. Time: an essay. Oxford, 1992.Ekengren М. The time of European governance. Manchester, 2002.Ekengren М. The time of European governance. Manchester, 2002.Ferrarotti F. Time, memory, and society // Contributions in Sociology. 1990. N 91.Ferrarotti F. Time, memory, and society // Contributions in Sociology. 1990. N 91.Gell A. The anthropology of time. Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford, 1996.Gell A. The anthropology of time. Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford, 1996.Goetz K. The EU timescape: an emergent temporal order. Ch. 8 // Institutional Dynamics and the Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe / Ed. by M. Egeberg. Mannheim, 2007. P. 263–290.Goetz K. The EU timescape: an emergent temporal order. Ch. 8 // Institutional Dynamics and the Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe / Ed. by M. Egeberg. Mannheim, 2007. P. 263–290.Goetz K. How does EU tick? Five propositions on political time // Journal of European Public Policy. 2009. March. Vol. 16 (2). P. 202–220.Goetz K. How does EU tick? Five propositions on political time // Journal of European Public Policy. 2009. March. Vol. 16 (2). P. 202–220.Goldstein J.S. Kondratieff waves as war cycles // International Studies Quarterly. 1985. Dec. Vol. 29 (4). P. 411–444.Goldstein J.S. Kondratieff waves as war cycles // International Studies Quarterly. 1985. Dec. Vol. 29 (4). P. 411–444.Gurvitch G. The spectrum of social time. Dordrecht, 1964. Halliday T. Time and temporality in global governance // Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications / Ed. by P.Gurvitch G. The spectrum of social time. Dordrecht, 1964. Halliday T. Time and temporality in global governance // Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications / Ed. by P.Drahos. 2017. Canberra, P. 303–321.Drahos. 2017. Canberra, P. 303–321.Halliday T., Carruthers B.G. Foiling the hegemons: limits to the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes in Indonesia, Korea and China // Globalization and Resistance: Law Reform in Asia since the Crisis / Ed. by C. Anton, V. Gessner. Oxford, P. 255–301. KHalliday T., Carruthers B.G. Foiling the hegemons: limits to the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes in Indonesia, Korea and China // Globalization and Resistance: Law Reform in Asia since the Crisis / Ed. by C. Anton, V. Gessner. Oxford, P. 255–301. Kahn P.W. Political time: sovereignty and the transtemporal community // Cardozo Law Review. 2006. Vol. 28 (1). P. 259–276.ahn P.W. Political time: sovereignty and the transtemporal community // Cardozo Law Review. 2006. Vol. 28 (1). P. 259–276.Kondratieff N.D., Stolper W.F. The long waves in economic life // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1935. Nov. Vol. 17 (6). P. 105–115.Kondratieff N.D., Stolper W.F. The long waves in economic life // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1935. Nov. Vol. 17 (6). P. 105–115.Koselleck R. Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, 1985.Koselleck R. Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, 1985.Kovats L. Do elections set the pace? A quantitative assessment of the timing of European legislation // Journal of the European Public Policy. 2009. March. P. 239–255.Kovats L. Do elections set the pace? A quantitative assessment of the timing of European legislation // Journal of the European Public Policy. 2009. March. P. 239–255.Lefebvre H. Rhythmanalysis: space, time, and everyday life. L.; N.Y., 2004.Lefebvre H. Rhythmanalysis: space, time, and everyday life. L.; N.Y., 2004.Levy J.S. War in the modern great power system, 1495–1975. Lexington, 1983.Levy J.S. War in the modern great power system, 1495–1975. Lexington, 1983.Linz J.J. Democracy’s time constraints // International Political Science Review. 1998. Vol. 19 (1). P. 19–37.Linz J.J. Democracy’s time constraints // International Political Science Review. 1998. Vol. 19 (1). P. 19–37.Luhmann N. The future cannot begin: temporal structures in modern society // Social Research. Vol. 43 (1). P. 130–152.Luhmann N. The future cannot begin: temporal structures in modern society // Social Research. Vol. 43 (1). P. 130–152.Mahoney J. Path dependence in historical sociology // Theory and Society. 2000. Vol. 29. P. 507–548.Mahoney J. Path dependence in historical sociology // Theory and Society. 2000. Vol. 29. P. 507–548.Osborne P. The politics of time: modernity and avant-garde. L.; N.Y., 1995.Osborne P. The politics of time: modernity and avant-garde. L.; N.Y., 1995.Ornstein R.E. On the experience of time. L., 1969.Ornstein R.E. On the experience of time. L., 1969.Pierson P. Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton, 2004.Pierson P. Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton, 2004.Pinfari M. Peace negotiations and time: deadline diplomacy in territorial disputes. L., 2013.Pinfari M. Peace negotiations and time: deadline diplomacy in territorial disputes. L., 2013.Pinfari M. Time to agree: is time pressure good for peace negotiations? // The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2011. Oct. Vol. 55 (5). P. 683–709.Pinfari M. Time to agree: is time pressure good for peace negotiations? // The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2011. Oct. Vol. 55 (5). P. 683–709.Portella E. Future without a future // Time in the making and possible futures / Ed. by E.R. Larreta. L., 2000.Portella E. Future without a future // Time in the making and possible futures / Ed. by E.R. Larreta. L., 2000.Riescher G. Zeit and Politik. Baden-Baden, 1994.Riescher G. Zeit and Politik. Baden-Baden, 1994.Sayrs L.W. The long cycle in international relations: a Markov specification // International Studies Quarterly. 1993. June. Vol. 37 (2). P. 215–237.Sayrs L.W. The long cycle in international relations: a Markov specification // International Studies Quarterly. 1993. June. Vol. 37 (2). P. 215–237.Schedler A., Santiso J. Democracy and time: an invitation // International Political Science Review. 1998. Vol. 19 (1). P. 5–18.Schedler A., Santiso J. Democracy and time: an invitation // International Political Science Review. 1998. Vol. 19 (1). P. 5–18.Schuman H., Corning A., Schwartz B. Framing variations and collective memory. “Honest Abe” versus “the great emancipator” // Social Science History. 2012. Winter. Vol. 36 (4). P. 451–472.Schuman H., Corning A., Schwartz B. Framing variations and collective memory. “Honest Abe” versus “the great emancipator” // Social Science History. 2012. Winter. Vol. 36 (4). P. 451–472.Schwartz B. Rethinking the concept of collective memory // Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies / Ed. by A.L. Tota, T. Hagen. N.Y., 2016. P. 27–39.Schwartz B. Rethinking the concept of collective memory // Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies / Ed. by A.L. Tota, T. Hagen. N.Y., 2016. P. 27–39.Schwartz B., Schuman H. History, commemoration, and belief: Abraham Lincoln in American memory, 1945–2001 // American Sociological Review. 2005. Vol. 70 (2). P. 183–203.Schwartz B., Schuman H. History, commemoration, and belief: Abraham Lincoln in American memory, 1945–2001 // American Sociological Review. 2005. Vol. 70 (2). P. 183–203.Schwartz B., Zerubavel Ya., Barnett B. Recovery of Masada: a study in collective memory // Sociological Quaterly. 1986. N 27. P. 147–164.Schwartz B., Zerubavel Ya., Barnett B. Recovery of Masada: a study in collective memory // Sociological Quaterly. 1986. N 27. P. 147–164.Sorokin P., Merton R.K. Social time: a methodological and functional analysis // The American Journal of Sociology. 1937. March. Vol. XLII (5). P. 615–629.Sorokin P., Merton R.K. Social time: a methodological and functional analysis // The American Journal of Sociology. 1937. March. Vol. XLII (5). P. 615–629.Slutzky E. The summation of random causes as the source of cyclic processes // Econometrica. 1937. Apr. Vol. 5 (2). P. 105–146.Slutzky E. The summation of random causes as the source of cyclic processes // Econometrica. 1937. Apr. Vol. 5 (2). P. 105–146.Tucker H.J. It’s about time: the use of time in cross-sectional state policy research // American Journal of Political Science. 1982. Febr. Vol. 26 (1). P. 176–196.Tucker H.J. It’s about time: the use of time in cross-sectional state policy research // American Journal of Political Science. 1982. Febr. Vol. 26 (1). P. 176–196.Zerubavel E. Time maps: collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago, 2003.Zerubavel E. Time maps: collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago, 2003.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.