References

sociolpolitol

Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

1029-37362541-8769

Publishing House of Lomonosov Moscow State University

10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-4-161-184

sociolpolitol-766

Research Article

ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ СОЦИОЛОГИЯ И МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ

ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT

Методология и инструментарий эмпирического исследования социального капитала организации: анализ теоретических подходов

Methodology and tools for the organization's social capital empirical research: the theoretical approaches analysis

Игумнов

О. А.

Igumnov

O. A.

Игумнов Олег Александрович - кандидат педагогических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры экономической теории и менеджмента.просп. Вернадского, д. 88, каб. 505, Москва, 119571.

Igumnov Oleg A. - Candidate of Pedagogics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the economic theory and Management Department of Institute of social and Humanitarian education, Moscow State Pedagogical University.prosp. Vernadsky, 88, office. 505, Moscow, 119571.

oleg_igumnov@mail.ru

Московский педагогический государственный университетРоссияMoscow State Pedagogical UniversityRussian Federation

2020

31122020

264161184

2020

Игумнов О.А.

Igumnov O.A.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://vestnik.socio.msu.ru/jour/article/view/766

Статья содержит результаты анализа методологических подходов к формированию инструментов исследования организационного социального капитала. Автор выделяет теоретико-методологические проблемы, актуализирующие операционализацию и выбор измерительных процедур для исследования социального капитала в связи с повышением его роли в управлении организациями. В статье выделены минимальные требования к операционализации социального капитала, которые не реализуются в большинстве исследований. На основе анализа автором выделены дедуктивная (более классическая) и индуктивная методологические стратегии. Первая стратегия требует исходного чёткого определения социального капитала как объекта исследования и выявления его составных элементов. Вторая стратегия предполагает конструирование понятия социального капитала в результате обобщения эмпирических явлений.Приведены результаты анализа нескольких обобщённых схем операционализации, предложенных различными исследователями (схемы «сверху-вниз» и «снизу-вверх). На основании анализа сделан вывод о преимуществах конструирования понятия социального капитала на основе эмпирического подхода по сравнению с теоретико-дедуктивным подходом, который, вместе с тем, ограничен предметом изучения. Попытки метаанализа социального капитала сводятся к изучению не столько содержания, сколько эффектов. В статье отмечена возрастающая роль цифровизации в формировании сетевых сообществ, трансформирующихся под воздействием новых информационно-коммуникационных структур, в диверсифицированный тип социальных объединений, которые радикально не меняют природу и содержание социального капитала.

The article contains the results of the methodological approaches to the formation of tools for the study of organizational social capital analysis. The author identifies theoretical and methodological problems that actualize the operationalization and choice of measurement procedures for the study of social capital in connection with its increasing role in the management of organizations. The article highlights the minimum requirements for the operationalization of social capital which are not implemented in most studies. Based on the analysis, the author identifies deductive (more classical) and inductive methodological strategies. The first strategy requires an initial clear definition of social capital as an object of research and identification of its constituent elements. The second strategy involves constructing the concept of social capital as a result of generalizing empirical phenomena. The results of the analysis of several generalized operationalization schemes proposed by various researchers (“top-down” and “bottom-up” schemes) are presented. It is concluded that the advantages of constructing the concept of social capital on the basis of an empirical approach in comparison with the theoretical and deductive approach which however is limited due to the subject of study. Attempts of social capital meta-analysis are reduced to the study of effects rather than content. The article notes the increasing role of digitalization in the formation of network communities that are transformed under new information and communication structures influence into a diversified type of social associations that do not radically change the nature and content of social capital.

социальный капиталметаанализоперационализация социального капиталаструктурное измерение социального капиталакогнитивное измерение социального капиталареляционное измерение социального капиталасоциальные сетисоциальные связи

social capitalmeta-analysisoperationalization of social capitalstructural dimension of social capitalcognitive dimension of social capitalrelational dimension of social capitalsocial networkssocial connections

References1

Aguirre J.L.L. Studying social capital in the new communitarian horizon: a multimethod research strategy // Handbook of Research on Methods and techniques for studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena / ed. by B.K. Daniel. Hershey; N.Y., 2011. P. 753-765.

Arrival and departure dynamics in social networks // WDSM. 2013. Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Web search and Data Mining, Rome, 2013. N.Y., 2013. P. 233-242.

Bakshy E., Eckles D., Yan R., Rosenn I. Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments // Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Valencia, 2012. P. 146-161.

Bataeva E.V. Social'nye akcii i interakcii v virtual'nyh soobshhestvah [Social actions and interactions in virtual communities] // Sociologicheskij zhurnal. 2011. N 3. S. 50-70 (in Russian).

Blanchard A., Horan T. Virtual communities and social capital // Social Science Computer Review. 1998. Vol. 16. P. 293-307.

Burke M., Kraut R., Marlow C. Social capital on Facebook: differentiating uses and users // Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing systems. Vancouver, 2011. P. 571-580.

Castells M. The rise of the network society. Malden, 2010.

Chapman C.N., Lahav M. International ethnographic observation of social networking sites // Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. N.Y., 2008. P. 3123-3128.

Chin A., Chignell M. Identifying communities in blogs: roles for social network analysis and survey instruments // International Journal of Web Based Communities. 2007. Vol. 3. P. 343-365.

Couch C.J. Information technologies and social order. N.Y., 2017.

Daniel B., Zapta-Rivera J.-D., McCalla G. A computational model of social capital in virtual communities // Handbook of Research on Methods and techniques for studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena / ed. by B.K. Daniel. Hershey; N.Y., 2011. P. 318-330.

Deth J.W., van. Measuring social capital: orthodoxies and continuing controversies // International Journal of social Research Methodology. 2003. Vol. 6. P. 79-92.

Dokuka S.V. Sovremennye podhody k izucheniju virtual'nyh soobshhestv [Modern approaches to the study of virtual communities] // Vestnik RGGU. Serija: Filosofija. Sociologija. Iskusstvovedenie. 2014. N 4. S. 125-137 (in Russian).

Fiske A.P. The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations // Psychological Review. 1992. Vol. 99. P. 689-723.

From social data mining and analysis to prediction and community detection / Ed. by M. Kaya, O. Erdogan, J. Rokne. Cham, 2017.

Fuchs C. Internet and society: social theory in the information age. N.Y., 2007.

Gelfand M.J. Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-Nation study // Science. 2011. Vol. 332. P. 1100-1104.

Grootaert C., Narayan D., Jones V.N., Woolcock M. Measuring social capital: an integrated questionnaire // World Bank Working Paper. 2004. N 18.

Handbook of research on methods and techniques for studying virtual communities: paradigms and phenomena / ed. by B.K. Daniel. Hershey; N.Y., 2011.

Harlamov A.V., Bezrodnaya L.V., Poddyachaya E.A. Metody izucheniya social'nogo kapitala v internet-srede [Methods for studying social capital in the Internet environment] // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2018. N 1. S. 42-47 (in Russian).

Harpham T., Grant E., Thomas E. Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues // Health Policy and Planning. 2002. Vol. 17. P. 106-111.

Haslam N., Fiske A.P. Relational models theory: a confirmatory factor analysis // Personal Relationships. 1999. Vol. 6. P. 241-250.

Hercheui M.D. A literature review of virtual communities // Information, Communication & Society. 2011. Vol. 14. P. 1-23.

Konchakovskij R.V. setevoe internet-soobshhestvo kak sociokul'turnyj fenomen [The networked Internet community as a sociocultural phenomenon]. Avtoref. diss. . kand. sociol. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2010 (in Russian).

Lampe C. et al. Crowdsourcing civility: a natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums // Government Information Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 31. P. 317-326.

Li N., Wu D.D. Using text mining and sentiment analysis for online forums hotspot detection and forecast // Decision support systems. 2010. Vol. 48. P. 354-368.

Lochner K., Kawachi I., Kennedy B.P. Social capital: a guide to its measurement // Health & Place. 1999. Vol. 5. P. 259-270.

Narayan D., Cassidy M.F. A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory // Current sociology. 2001. Vol. 49 (2). P. 59-102.

Onyx J., Bullen P. Measuring social capital in five communities // The Journal of Applied Behavioral science. 2000. Vol. 36. P. 23-42.

Roden D. et al. Procedures for analyses of online communities // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2003. Vol. 8. DoI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00219.x

Rojas H., Shah D.V., Friedland L.A. A communicative approach to social capital // Journal of Communication. 2011. Vol. 61. P. 689-712.

Social computing and virtual communities/ ed. by P. Zaphirs, C.S. Ang. Boca Raton, 2010.

Stam W., Arzlanian S., Elfring T. Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: a meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators // Journal of Business Venturing. 2014. Vol. 29. P. 152-173.

Stone W. Measuring social capital: toward a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life // Research Paper. 2001. N 24.

Tampubolon G. An overview of social networks // Social Computing and Virtual Communities / ed. by P. Zaphirs, C.S. Ang. Boca Raton, 2010. P. 21-36.

The psychology of social networking. Vol. 1. Personal experience in online communities / ed. by G. Riva, Wiederhold, P. Cipresso. Warshaw; Berlin, 2016.

Understanding and measuring social capital: a multidisciplinary tool for practitioners / ed. by C. Grootaert, T. van Bastelaer. Washington, 2002.

Wellman B., Gulia M. Net surfers don't ride alone: virtual communities as communities // networks in the Global Village / ed. by B. Wellman. Boulder, 1999. P. 331-366.

Wright K.B. Researching Internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2005. Vol. 10. DoI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x

Zhukova T.I., Korzheva Je.M. K probleme sociologizacii v virtual'nyh setevyh soobshhestvah [On the problem of sociologization in virtual network communities] // Trudy ISA RAN. 2008. T. 34. S. 45-59 (in Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.