Cinema as a subject of sociological analysis: features of modern cinematography

The article analyzes cinema as a subject of sociological analysis. Approaches to the conceptualization of the term “cinema” are considered, their specificity is revealed. Cinematography is presented as an art form, mass media and communication, a social institution, and an industry of the economy. The functions and role of cinema in society are highlighted.

Particular attention is paid to the features of modern cinematography, among which there are three main ones – the globalization of cinematography, the change in the model of film production and the serialization of cinematography. The positive and negative social consequences of the process of globalization in the field of cinema are highlighted. It is emphasized that the state, which can regulate and control the process of distribution of film products, acquires a special role in the era of globalization. The inequality in the field of film production is analyzed.

The article presents the characteristics of the modern film production model associated with a high level of competition in the film industry, as well as control in the field of protection of intellectual property rights. In modern cinema, it is common to expand storylines and create prequels, sequels, and crossovers. The reasons for this process are described, such as commercialization, unwillingness to take risks, focus on the mass consumer, and others. Serialization is considered as the third significant feature of modern cinema. The history of serialization, its main stages and their characteristics are presented. In conclusion, potential trajectories for the development of modern cinema are presented.

1. “Cheburashka” oboshel “Avatar” i stal samym kassovym fil’mom v istorii rossijskogo prokata [“Cheburashka” bypassed “Avatar” and became the highest grossing film in the history of Russian distribution] // Kommersant#. 13.01.2023. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5771561 (data obrashhenija: 14.01.2023) (in Russian).

2. Agafonova N.A. Obshhaja teorija kino i osnovy analiza fil’ma [General Theory of Cinema and Fundamentals of Film Analysis]. Minsk, 2008. URL: https://www.aup.com.ua/ml/conf/9.pdf (data obrashhenija: 10.01.2023) (in Russian).

3. Dzhejmison F. Marksizm i interpretacija kul’tury [Marxism and the interpretation of culture]. M.; Ekaterinburg, 2014 (in Russian).

4. Fedjuk A.V. Sovetskaja sistema kinoproizvodstva i kinoprokata v 1920-e – 1930-e gg. [The Soviet system of film production and distribution in the 1920s – 1930s]: Avtoref. diss. ... k.i.n. Novosibirsk, 2009 (in Russian).

5. Istorija, celi i zadachi Fonda kino [History, goals and objectives of the Cinema Fund] // Fond kino. URL: https://www.fond-kino.ru/about/history/ (data obrashhenija: 10.01.2023) (in Russian).

6. Kashani T. Fil’my, kotorye menjajut zhizn’, Konstruktivnaja transformacija v kino [Films that change lives, Constructive transformation in cinema]. Har’kov, 2018 (in Russian).

7. Kononenko B.I. Bol’shoj tolkovyj slovar’ po kul’turologii [Large explanatory dictionary of cultural studies]. M., 2003 (in Russian).

8. Kushnareva I. Kak nas priuchili k serialam [How we were taught to serials] // Logos. 2013. N 3. S. 9–20 (in Russian).

9. Lasswell H.D. The structure and function of communication in society // Schramm W., Roberts D.F. The Process and Effects of Mass Communication. Urbana, 1971. P. 84–99. URL: http://sipa.jlu.edu.cn/__local/E/39/71/4CE63D3C04A10B5795F0108EBE6_A7BC17AA_34AAE.pdf (accessed: 27.12.2022).

10. Liotar Zh.-F. Sostojanie postmoderna [The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge]. M.; SPb., 1998 (in Russian).

11. Makljujen M. Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshirenija cheloveka [Under-standing Media: The Extensions of Man]. M., 2018 (in Russian).

12. Martynenko T.S. Obraz social’nogo neravenstva v antiutopijah nachala XXI v. [The image of social inequality in the anti-utopias of the early XXI century] // Kino i kapital. Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii Centra issledovanij jekonomicheskoj kul’tury SPbGU. SPb., 2017. S. 84–85 (in Russian).

13. Mkrtycheva M.S. Kino kak predmet sociologicheskogo izuchenija: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy [Cinema as a subject of sociological study: opportunities and prospects] // Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija. 2012. N 12. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kino-kak-predmet-sotsiologicheskogo-izucheniya-vozmozhnosti-i-perspektivy (data obrashhenija: 12.01.2023) (in Russian).

14. Monastyrskij V.A. Kino kak vid iskusstva [Cinema as a form of art] // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Serija: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2001. N 3–2 (23). S. 79–82 (in Russian).

15. Novikova A.A. Serial kak instrument sociokul’turnogo vozdejstvija [The series as a tool of social and cultural influence] // Bol’shoj format: jekrannaja kul’tura v jepohu transmedijnosti. T. 3. M., 2018. S. 119–130. URL: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/316256556.pdf (data obrashhenija: 11.01.2023) (in Russian).

16. Osipova N.G. Kino [Cinema] // Jeffektivnaja kommunikacija: istorija, teorija, praktika. Slovar’-spravochnik. M., 2005. S. 718–720 (in Russian).

17. Osipova N.G. Sovremennaja sociologicheskaja teorija [Modern sociological theory]. M., 2020 (in Russian).

18. Osipova N.G. Jevoljucija social’nyh institutov sem’i, rodstva i braka v kontekste gendernogo neravenstva [The evolution of social institutions of family, kinship, and marriage in the context of gender inequality] // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2020. N 6. S. 114–125 (in Russian).

19. Podojnicyna I.I. Kino kak faktor globalizacii i kak gljem-produkt: k postanovke problemy [Cinema as a factor of globalization and as a glam product: to the formulation of the problem] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 12. Psihologija. Sociologija. Pedagogika. 2011. N 3. S. 250–262 (in Russian).

20. Roche E. Jennifer Aniston’s a cut above for 11 million women // Express. 2010.26.05. URL: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/177204/Jennifer-Aniston-s-a-cut-above-for-11-million-women (accessed: 14.01.2023).

21. Salamova Z. Serialy: ot viktorianskih romanov do videoigr [Series: from Victorian novels to video games] // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2016. N 4 (140). S. 362–368. URL: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/140_nlo_4_2016/article/12087/ (data obrashhenija: 11.01.2023) (in Russian).

22. Sharf Z. After historic “Parasite” run, South Korea vows to improve semibasement apartments // IndieWire. 2020.24.02. URL: https://www.indiewire.com/2020/02/parasite-south-korea-improve-semi-basement-apartments-1202213182/ (accessed: 14.01.2023).

23. Slovar’ russkogo jazyka: V 4-h t. [Dictionary of the Russian language: In 4 volumes] / Pod red. A.P. Evgen’evoj. M., 1999. https://kartaslov.ru/znachenie-slova/kinoiskusstvo (in Russian).

24. Vajsburg A.V. Rol’ kinematografa v processe socializacii molodogo pokolenija [The role of cinema in the process of socialization of the young generation] // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Nauki ob obshhestve i gumanitarnye nauki. 2018. N 2. S. 105–111 (in Russian).

25. Vasil’ev S.S. Otechestvennyj kinematograf na rubezhe jepoh: istorija krizisa. 1986–1996 gg. (na primere Krasnodarskogo kraja) [Domestic cinema at the turn of eras: the history of the crisis. 1986–1996 (on the example of the Krasnodar Territory)]: Avtoref. diss. ... k.i.n. Krasnodar, 2003 (in Russian).

26. Zhabskij M.I. Globalizm i funkcii kino v obshhestve [Globalism and the functions of cinema in society] // Vestnik Rossijskogo fonda fundamental’nyh issledovanij. 2005. N 4 (42). S. 43–50 (in Russian).

27. Zhabskij M.I. K voprosu o rynke v kino [To the question of the market in cinema] // Vestnik VGIK. 2016. N 3 (29). S. 128–139 (in Russian).

28. Zhabskij M.I. Kinematograf – zerkalo ili molot? [Cinema – a mirror or a hammer?]. M., 2010 (in Russian).

29. Zhabskij M.I. Vesternizacija kinematografa: opyt i uroki istorii [Westernization of cinema: experience and lessons of history] // Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 1996. N 2. S. 25–35 (in Russian).

30. Zhabskij M.I., Tarasov K.A. Rossijskaja sociologija kino v kontekste razvitija obshhestva [Russian Sociology of Cinema in the Context of Society Development] // Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2019. N 11. S. 73–81. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007449-6 (in Russian).

31. Zhizhek S. Kinogid izvrashhenca. Kino, filosofija, ideologija: sbornik jesse [Film guide pervert. Cinema, philosophy, ideology: a collection of essays]. Ekaterinburg, 2014 (in Russian).

32.