On the issue of ethnosocial identification in the border area
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2023-29-3-134-144
Abstract
The Ethnosocial identification actualizes the issue of interaction of population groups on both sides of the border in a global world. The issue of dual ethnic identification of residents of border regions, their acquisition of new features of the neighboring cultural environment, the formation of a special border identity is raised. Similar examples exist in various countries of the world, including the European Union, the United States of America, the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. Within the framework of the research, the author uses the following methods: historical, geopolitical and civilizational approaches, concrete historical, observation and generalization, systemic socio-political and ethnic analysis, synthesis. In the conclusions, he comes to the opinion that there is a need for a broad study of the issue of biethnors in the national sociological school, the actualization of this direction in our days.
About the Author
A. V. Bredikhin
Center “Russia, China, the World” of the Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bredikhin Anton V., PhD Hist., Researcher
Nakhimovsky Prospekt, 32, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Anzaldúa G. Borderlands: the new Mestiza = La Frontera. San Francisco, 1987.
2. Bespamyatnyh N.N. Granicy i pogranich’ya: podhody, ponyatiya, perspektivy [Borders and Borderlands: Approaches, Concepts, Perspectives]. Minsk, 2012 (in Russian).
3. Bespamyatnyh N.N. Ponyatie granicy v sociologicheskoj teorii [The concept of border in sociological theory] // Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Yanki Kupaly. Seriya 5. Ekonomika. Sociologiya. Biologiya. 2012. N 1 (125). S. 43–48 (in Russian).
4. Bredihin A.V. Etnosocial’naya identichnost’ sovremennogo rossijskogo kazachestva [Ethno-social identity of the modern Russian Cossacks] // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik. 2017. N 61. S. 6–18 (in Russian).
5. Bredihin A.V., Dzyuban V.V., Tret’yakov A.V. Donskaya kazach’ya elita kak element etnokul’turnogo Vozrozhdeniya kazachestva [Don Cossack elite as an element of the ethno-cultural Revival of the Cossacks] // Al’manah “Kazachestvo”. 2021. N 54. S. 7–13 (in Russian).
6. Bromlej Yu.V. Ocherki teorii etnosa [Essays on the theory of ethnos]. M., 1983 (in Russian).
7. Bublikov V.V. Etnicheskoe i grazhdanskoe v nacional’noj identichnosti rossiyan (na primere russko-ukrainskih bietnorov) [Ethnic and Civil in the National Identity of Russians (on the Example of Russian-Ukrainian Biethnics)] // Sociologiya religii v obshchestve pozdnego moderna. 2021. N 10. S. 218–224 (in Russian).
8. Bublikov V.V. Mezhdu russkimi i ukraincami: transformaciya etnicheskoj identichnosti lic s russko-ukrainskoj etnichnost’yu v Rossii [Between Russians and Ukrainians: the transformation of the ethnic identity of persons with Russian-Ukrainian ethnicity in Russia] // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2022. N 2. S. 168–187 (in Russian).
9. Bublikov V.V., Lyulya N.V. Rezul’taty polevyh issledovanij sredi zhitelej s russko-ukrainskoj etnicheskoj identichnost’yu v regionah Rossii [The results of field research among residents with Russian-Ukrainian ethnic identity in the regions of Russia] // Polevye issledovaniya v Verhnem Priob’e, Priirtysh’e i na Altae (arheologiya, etnografiya, ustnaya istoriya i muzeevedenie). 2021. N 16. S. 191–195 (in Russian).
10. Bublikov V.V., Svidovskaya A.S. Rodnoj yazyk i etnicheskaya identichnost’ sredi russko-ukrainskih bietnorov v Rossii [Native language and ethnic identity among Russian-Ukrainian bi-ethnics in Russia] // Vestnik antropologii. 2022. N 3. S. 99–120 (in Russian).
11. Bublikov V.V., Tkachev A.A. Naselenie s mnozhestvennoj etnichnost’yu (nacional’nost’yu) i prognoz ego fiksacii v hode Vserossijskoj perepisi naseleniya 2021 g. [Population with multiple ethnicity (nationality) and the forecast of its recording during the All-Russian population census in 2021] // Nauchnyj rezul’tat. Sociologiya i upravlenie. 2022. T. 8. N 1. S. 95–108 (in Russian).
12. Elishev S.O. Osnovy nacional’noj politiki [Fundamentals of national policy]. M., 2012 (in Russian).
13. Gumilyov L.N. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli [Ethnogenesis and the biosphere of the Earth] / Pod red. V.S. ZHekulina, Vstup. st. R.F. Itsa. L., 1990 (in Russian).
14. Hybrid Identities // Theoretical and Empirical Examinations Series: Studies in Critical Social Sciences. 2008. Vol. 12.
15. Karpilenya N.V. Obosnovanie osnov filosofii i metodologii geopolitiki dlya formirovaniya mnogopolyarnogo mira [Substantiation of the foundations of the philosophy and methodology of geopolitics for the formation of a multipolar world] // Arhont. 2022. N 5 (32). S. 4–46 (in Russian).
16. Krylov M.P. Regional’naya identichnost’ v Evropejskoj Rossii: Avtoref. diss. … dokt. geogr. Nauk [Regional identity in European Russia: Abstract of the thesis. diss. … doc. geogr. Sciences]. M., 2007 (in Russian).
17. Kul’turnaya slozhnost’ sovremennyh nacij [Cultural complexity of modern nations] / Otv. red. V.A. Tishkov, E.I. Filippova. M., 2016 (in Russian).
18. Omel’chenko D.A., Maksimova S.G., Noyanzina O.E., Surtaeva O.V. Regional’nye prostranstva religioznyh identichnostej sibirskogo prigranich’ya: kejsy chetyrekh regionov [Regional Spaces of Religious Identities of the Siberian Borderlands: Cases of Four Regions] // Metodologiya predotvrashcheniya ugroz v XXI veke: Sb. st. Irkutsk, 2022. S. 118–123 (in Russian).
19. Osipova N.G., Elishev S.O. Istoricheskaya Rossiya: teorii i perspektivy [Historical Russia: Theories and Perspectives]. M., 2020 (in Russian).
20. Pastyuk A.V. Obosnovanii transformacii kul’turno-civilizacionnoj identichnosti na postsovetskom prostranstve [Substantiation of the transformation of cultural and civilizational identity in the post-Soviet space] // Science Time. 2014. N 12. S. 387–390 (in Russian).
21. Putin zayavil, chto russkij narod mozhet ne sohranit’sya v sluchae raspada Rossii [Putin said that the Russian people may not be preserved in the event of the collapse of Russia] // TASS. URL: https://tass.ru/politika/17143665 (data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2023) (in Russian).
22. Pyzhova A.N. Etnicheskaya identichnost’ pomorov Arhangel’skoj oblasti cherez prizmu osnovnyh antropologicheskih podhodov [Ethnic identity of the Pomors of the Arkhangelsk region through the prism of the main anthropological approaches] // Arktika i Sever. 2012. N 7. S. 37–44 (in Russian).
23. Sadowski A. Harmonia i konflikty na pograniczach // Pogranicza etniczne w Europie: harmonia i konflikty / Red. K. Krzysztofek, A. Sadowski. Białystok, 2001.
24. Stefanenko T.G. Etnopsihologiya [Ethnopsychology]. M., 1999 (in Russian).
25. Turovskij R.F. Regional’naya identichnost’ v sovremennoj Rossii [Regional Identity in Modern Russia] // Rossijskoe obshchestvo: stanovlenie demokraticheskih cennostej? M., 1999. S. 87–136 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Bredikhin A.V. On the issue of ethnosocial identification in the border area. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2023;29(3):134-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2023-29-3-134-144
Views:
383
Email this article 