Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Humanism or conservatism?

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2024-30-2-88-113

Abstract

The article analyzes two of the most important teachings in the world of religious-philosophical and socio-political thought — humanism and conservatism. It is emphasized that the doctrine of humanism, which arose in the XIV–XVI centuries. initially opposed the traditional religious and philosophical teachings of European peoples, primarily Christianity. As a religious philosophy, humanism served as a tool for the destruction of traditional societies and traditional religions and at the same time served as a methodological basis for creating an ideal society of universal justice. In the XVI–XIX centuries. The religious and philosophical attitudes of humanism have become the methodological basis of all the main religious, philosophical, ethical, political, economic, and aesthetic teachings of Western European civilization. The humanistic attitudes in these teachings took various forms — from the most radical (Marxism, anarchism) to liberal and protective (Hegelianism). However, in the XX — early XXI century. humanism has become a tool of the leading so-called "civilized" states, with which they destroy undesirable state regimes and traditional values of peoples who do not fit into the newly created "world order". Russian Russian thought tradition, in turn, was initially traditionalist and conservative, moreover, Russian religious and philosophical teachings were markedly different from those of Western European ones. The article shows the history of the birth and development of the Russian traditionalist-conservative tradition from the XI to the XXI centuries. It is concluded that in the works of modern Russian researchers at the beginning of the XXI century, the basic principles of the traditionalist-conservative methodology were formulated in the new historical conditions in which the current human community exists. The term "Russian chranitelstvo" is proposed to designate this kind of methodology in modern Russian socio-humanities. A new understanding of the traditionalist-conservative approach to the analysis of the historical development of man and society makes it possible to reflect and show the civilizational specifics of Russia, the complexity, multidimensional nature and interdependence of those social, spiritual, religious, political and economic processes that determined Russian statehood, as well as to offer an alternative, and, most importantly, a perspective view of the current state and the future of our state and people.

About the Author

S. V. Perevezentsev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Perevezentsev Sergey V., Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of Department of History of Social and Political Doctrines, Faculty of Political Science

GSP-1, Lomonosovskiy prospect, 27, korp. 4, faculty of politologii, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991



References

1. Alekseev A.I. Pod znakom konca vremen. Ocherki russkoj religioznosti konca XIV — nachala XVI vv. SPb., 2002 (in Russian).

2. Amin S. Virus liberalizma: permanentnaya vojna i amerikanizaciya mira. M., 2007.

3. Antologiya filosofii Srednih Vekov i epohi Vozrozhdeniya / Sost., vstup. st., predisl. S.V. Perevezenceva. M., 2001 (in Russian).

4. Bohanov A.N. Aleksandr III. S Rossiej na plechah. M., 2013 (in Russian).

5. Bohanov A.N. Imperator Nikolaj II. M., 2021 (in Russian).

6. Buharin N.I. Ekonomika perekhodnogo perioda. M.zdat, 1920 (in Russian).

7. CHelishchev V.I. Liberalizm — neoliberalizm — rynochnyj fundamentalizm: ot koncepcii svo-body k totalitarnoj dogme (nachalo) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya. 2015. № 4. S. 27–49 (in Russian).

8. CHistov G.A. Krizis gumanizma i perspektivy razvitiya Rossii // Vestnik YUUrGU. 2009. № 9 (142). S. 141–145 (in Russian).

9. Danilevskij N.YA. Rossiya i Evropa: Vzglyad na kul'turnye i politicheskie otnosheniya slavyanskogo mira k germano-romanskomu. SPb., 1871 (in Russian).

10. Dante Alig'eri. Bozhestvennaya komediya. M., 1967 (in Russian).

11. Deneen P.J. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, Yale, 2018.

12. Dmitriev M.V. “Svyataya Rus'” i Rus' kak “Novyj Izrail'”, Moskva — “Tretij Rim”: konfessiya, natio i protonacional'nye diskursy v vostochnoslavyanskih kul'turah X–XVII vv. URL: http://www.hist.msu.ru/Labs/UkrBel/rus_israel.htm (in Russian).

13. Dostoevskij F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij v 30 t. L., 1978. T. 18. S. 35–40 (in Russian).

14. Emel’yanov-Luk’yanchikov M.A. Ierarhiya radugi. M., 2008 (in Russian).

15. Ermashov D.V. SHirinyanc A.A. U istokov rossijskogo konservatizma: N.M. Karamzin. M., 1999 (in Russian).

16. Filyushkin A.I. Andrej Mihajlovich Kurbskij: Prosopograficheskoe issledovanie i germenevtich-eskij kommentarij k poslaniyam Andreya Kurbskogo Ivanu Groznomu. SPb., 2007 (in Russian).

17. Gadzhiev K.S. Krizis ili zakat liberalizma? // Vlast'. 2017. T. 25. № 3. S. 7–17 (in Russian).

18. Gutorov V.A., SHirinyanc A.A. O novom “istoricheskom prochtenii” liberal'noj tradicii // Dialog so vremenem. 2021. № 74. S. 398–406 (in Russian).

19. Harriman A. What One Tourist Found; peace with Russia? N.Y., 1959.

20. Holyaev S.V. Vliyanie masonov na liberal'nyj lager' v 1917 godu // Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya Istoriya. Politologiya. Ekonomika. Informatika. 2011. № 19 (114). Vyp. 20. S. 173–184 (in Rus-sian).

21. Homyakov A.S. Eshche neskol'ko slov Pravoslavnogo Hristianina o zapadnyh veroispovedaniyah po povodu raznyh sochinenij Latinskih i Protestantskih o predmetah very // Homyakov A.S., Kireevskij I.V. Izbrannye sochineniya / Sost., avtor vstup. st. i koment. N.I. Cimbaev. M., 2010. S. 180–228 (in Russian).

22. Homyakov A.S. Pis'mo k redaktoru “L’Union Chretienne” o znachenii slov “kafolicheskij” i “sob-ornyj” po povodu rechi otca Gagarina, iezuita // Homyakov A. S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. 3-e izd. M., 1886. T. 2. S. 319–328 (in Russian).

23. Hraniteli Rossii. Antologiya. T. 2. V poiskah novogo… konservatizma / Pod red. A.A. SHirinyanca, S.V. Perevezenceva. M., 2015 (in Russian).

24. Hraniteli Rossii. Antologiya. T. 3. Rozhdenie russkogo konservatizma. 1800–1850 gg. / Pod red. A.YU. Minakova, S.V. Perevezenceva, A.A. SHirinyanca. M., 2016.

25. CHasha Germesa: Gumanisticheskaya mysl' epohi Vozrozhdeniya i germeticheskaya tradiciya / Sost., vstup. st., komm. O.F. Kudryavceva. M., 1996 (in Russian).

26. Imperator Nikolaj Pervyj / Sost. M.D. Filin. M., 2002 (in Russian).

27. Karavashkin A.V. Literaturnyj obychaj Drevnej Rusi (XI–XVI vv.). M., 2011 (in Russian).

28. Karamzin N.M. O drevnej i novoj Rossii v ee politicheskom i grazhdanskom otnosheniyah // Karamzin N.M. Izbrannye trudy / Sost., vst. st. i komment. A.A. SHirinyanc; vst. st. D.V. Er-mashov; komment. A.I. SHevlyakov; sost. A.YU. Starostin. M., 2010. S. 279–348 (in Russian).

29. Klibanov A.I. Duhovnaya kul’tura srednevekovoj Rossii. M., 1996 (in Russian).

30. Klibanov A.I. Reformacionnye dvizheniya v Rossii v XIV — pervoj polo-vine XVI v. M., 1960 (in Russian).

31. Kovaleva S.V., Masterov D.V. Liberal’naya ideologiya kak destruktivnyj faktor social’nogo razvitiya // Evrazijskij Soyuz Uchenyh. 2015. № 12–4 (21). S. 73–77 (in Russian).

32. Kostryukov A.A. Lekcii po istorii Russkoj Cerkvi (1917–2008). M., 2023 (in Russian).

33. Kulikov C.V. Fevral’skaya revolyuciya spustya sto let // Vestnik SPbGU. Is-toriya. 2017. T. 62. Vyp. 3. S. 545–559 (in Russian).

34. Kurbskij A.M. Istoriya velikogo knyazya Moskovskogo // BLDR. SPb., 2001. T. 11. S. S. 310–479 (in Russian).

35. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. 5-e izd. T. 26. M., 1969 (in Russian).

36. Leont’ev K.N. Vizantizm i slavyanstvo. M., 1876 (in Russian).

37. Leont’ev K.N. Vostok, Rossiya i Slavyanstvo: Filosofskaya i politicheskaya publicistika. Duhov-naya proza (1872–1891). M., 1996 (in Russian).

38. Lur’e V.M. “Sobornost'”: poyavlenie termina i ponyatiya v trudah Psevdo-Homyakova // Studia Religiosa Rossica: nauchnyj zhurnal o religii. 2020. № 1. S. 72–88 (in Russian).

39. Lur’e YA.S. Russkie sovremenniki Vozrozhdeniya. L., 1988 (in Russian).

40. Minakov A.YU. Russkij konservatizm pervoj chetverti XIX v. Voronezh, 2011 (in Russian).

41. Nikolaj II. Poslednij imperator Rossii: Sb. biograficheskih i bibliograficheskih materialov / Sost.: E.V. YAroshenko, A.A. Ermak. M., 2008 (in Russian).

42. Perevezencev S.V. Osnovnye napravleniya russkoj social'no-politicheskoj mysli XVIII v. // Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura. 2016. № 3. S. 9–17 (in Russian).

43. Perevezencev S.V. Ocherki nacional'nogo samosoznaniya. M., 2007 (in Russian).

44. Perevezencev S.V. Russkaya religiozno-filosofskaya mysl' X–XVII vv. Osnovnye idei i tendencii razvitiya. M., 1999 (in Russian).

45. Perevezencev S.V. Russkie smysly: Duhovno-politicheskie ucheniya Rossii X–XVII vv. v ih is-toricheskom razvitii. Monografiya. 2-e izd., ispr., dop. M., 2023 (in Russian).

46. Perevezencev S.V., SHirinyanc A.A. V poiskah samobytnosti. Ob istokah otechestvennogo nacional-konservativnogo diskursa // Tetradi po konservatizmu: Al'manah. 2017. № 3. S. 61–74 (in Russian).

47. Perevezencev S.V., SHirinyanc A.A. Ocherki istorii russkogo hranitel'stva. M., 2021 (in Russian).

48. Pliguzov A.I. Polemika v Russkoj Cerkvi pervoj treti XVI stoletiya. M., 2002 (in Russian).

49. Polomoshnov P.A. Gumanizm i krizis identichnosti // KANT. 2018. № 2. S. 202–205 (in Rus-sian).

50. Poslanie na Ugru Vassiana Rylo // BLDR. T. 7. SPb., 2005. S. 386–399 (in Russian).

51. Poslaniya starca Filofeya // BLDR. T. 9. SPb., 2000. S. 290–305 (in Russian).

52. Repnikov A.V. Konservativnye koncepcii pereustrojstva Rossii. M., 2007 (in Russian).

53. Rormozer G. Krizis liberalizma / Per. A. A. Frenkin. M., 1996 (in Russian).

54. Russkij konservatizm serediny XVIII — nachala XX veka. M., 2010 (in Russian).

55. Sinicyna N. V. Tretij Rim: istoki i evolyuciya russkoj srednevekovoj koncepcii. (XV—XVI vv.). M., 1998 (in Russian).

56. SHirinyanc A.A. “Konservator”, “konservatizm”, “konservativnyj” v rus-skoj social'no-politicheskoj mysli XIX veka // Sensus Historiae. Vol. XX (2015/3). S. 27–35 (in Russian).

57. SHirinyanc A.A. “Konservator”: slovo i smysly v russkoj social'no-politicheskoj mysli XIX veka // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2015. № 6. S. 112–124 (in Russian).

58. SHirinyanc A.A. Nigilizm ili konservatizm? (Russkaya intelligenciya v istorii politiki i mysli). M., 2011 (in Russian).

59. SHirinyanc A.A. Hranitel'stvo kak osnovanie konservativnoj politicheskoj kul'tury intelligencii (opyt poreformennoj Rossii): koncepciya russkoj monarhii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2006. № 4. S. 69–87 (in Russian).

60. SHmidt S.O. Prodolzhenie Hronografa redakcii 1512 g. // Istoricheskij arhiv. T. VII. M., 1951. S. 295–296 (in Russian).

61. Skazanie o knyaz'yah Vladimirskih // BLDR. T. 9. SPb., 2000. S. 278–289 (in Russian).

62. “Slovo o Zakone i Blagodati” mitropolita Kievskogo Ilariona // Biblioteka literatury Drevnej Ru-si. T. 1. SPb., 1997. S. 26–61 (in Russian).

63. Smolin M.B. Ideologiya pravogo konservatizma. M., 2023 (in Russian).

64. Talina G.V. Vybor puti: Russkoe samoderzhavie vtoroj poloviny XVII — pervoj chetverti XVIII veka. M., 2010 (in Russian).

65. Tihomirov L.A. Monarhicheskaya gosudarstvennost'. M., 2010 (in Russian).

66. Tihomirov L.A. Religiozno-filosofskie osnovy istorii. M., 1997 (in Russian).

67. Tihonyuk I.A. “Izlozhenie paskhalij” moskovskogo mitropolita Zosimy // Issledovanie po isto-chnikovedeniyu istorii SSSR XIII–XVIII vv. M., 1986. S. 45–61 (in Russian).

68. Uvarov S.S. O nekotoryh obshchih nachalah, mogushchih sluzhit' rukovodstvom pri upravlenii Ministerstvom narodnogo prosveshcheniya // Doklady ministra narodnogo prosveshcheniya S. S. Uvarova imperatoru Nikolayu I / Publ. M. M. SHevchenko // Reka vremen. Kniga istorii i kul'tury. M., 1995. Kn. 1. S. 70–72 (in Russian).

69. Vasil’ev A.A. Ocherki istorii russkoj konservativnoj pravovoj mysli v XIX v. (slavyanofil’stvo i pochvennichestvo). M., 2011 (in Russian).

70. Vidoevich Z. Liberal’nyj totalitarizm // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2007. № 12. S. 39–49 (in Russian).

71. Vishnevski E. Progressivnyj blok // Istoriya Rossii v sovremennoj zaru-bezhnoj nauke. 1999. № 2. S. 147–157 (in Russian).

72. Vyskochkov L.V. Nikolaj I. M., 2006 (in Russian).

73. YUrganov A.L. Kategorii russkoj srednevekovoj kul'tury. M., 1998 (in Russian).

74. Zapiska K.S. Aksakova “O vnutrennem sostoyanii Rossii”, predstavlennaya gosudaryu impera-toru Aleksandru II v 1855 g. // Aksakov K.S., Aksakov I.S. Izbrannye trudy / Sost., avtory vstup. st. i komment. A.A. SHirinyanc, A.V. Myrikova, E.B. Fursova. M., 2010. S. 227–252 (in Russian). 


Review

For citations:


Perevezentsev S.V. Humanism or conservatism? Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2024;30(2):88-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2024-30-2-88-113

Views: 928


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)