On the issue of functions and dysfunctions of lobbying

Current article is devoted to the analysis of the functions and dysfunctions of lobbying. Such analysis is especially relevant in the light of ongoing debate in Russia and across the world regarding the nature of lobbying, what place this institution belong to in the political system, and how to avoid its negative aspects. The author strives to give a balanced assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the institution of lobbying, its role in the political process, as well as possible ways to level out the negative aspects of this phenomenon. The author concludes that the contradictions between the functions and dysfunctions of lobbying were inherent in its nature. Having emerged from the evolution of socio-political demands of certain social groups, lobbying never institutionalized in the same way as political parties or parliaments. At the same time, it has become an important channel of communication between society and the state, an institution through which the articulation and aggregation of interests, group and public integration occurs, and the current agenda is set. At the same time, the evolution of of lobbying is constantly accompanied by a number of dysfunctions. The essence of dysfunction lies in the initially informal and shadow nature of this sphere. Lobbying does not equal corruption, however, due to its closeness, lack of accountability and informal nature, it contains the risks of corrupt relationships, varying from one society to another depending on the norms and traditions of interaction between organized groups and the state. In addition, the enormous and ever-increasing influence of interest groups, especially those representing the business sector, leads to disproportionate protection of private interests for the sake of public ones. The solution to these contradictions can only be facilitated by a balanced state policy aimed at building a mechanism for promoting and coordinating group interests that would primarily meet the public needs and interests.

1. Almond G., Coleman G. The politics of the developing areas. Princeton, 1960.

2. Almond G., Paujell Dzh., Strom K., Dalton R. Sravnitel’naja politologija segodnja. Mirovoj obzor [Comparative politcs today]. M., 2002 (in Russian).

3. Almond G., Verba S. The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Boston, 1965.

4. Berry J., Wilcox C. The interest group society. N.Y., 2015.

5. Birkland T. Introduction to the policy process. N.Y., 2015.

6. Bunea A. Legitimacy through targeted transparency? Regulatory effectiveness and sustainability of lobbying regulation in the European Union // European Journal of Political Research. 2018. N 57.

7. Dahl R. Who governs? New Haven, 1961.

8. Dondero R., Lunch W. Interest groups // Oregon politics and government: Progressives versus conservative populists / Ed. by R.A. Clucas, M. Henkels, B.S. Steel. Lincoln, 2005.

9. Dye T., Zeigler H. The irony of democracy: an uncommon introduction to American politics. Boston, 2008.

10. Fukuyama F. The decay of American political institutions // The American Interest. 2013. Vol. 9. N 3. URL: https://www.the-american-interest.com/2013/12/08/the-decay-of-american-political-institutions/ (accessed: 10.05.2024).

11. Hajek F.A. Individualizm i jekonomicheskij porjadok [Individualism and economic order]. M., 2000 (in Russian).

12. Heaney M., Lorenz G. Coalition portfolios and interest group influence over the policy process // Interest Groups & Advocacy. 2013. N 2.

13. Kirillina V.N., Janikeeva I.O. K voprosu o lobbistskoj dejatel’nosti v sovremennoj Rossii [On the issue of lobbying activities in modern Russia] // Biznes. Obshhestvo. Vlast’. 2017. N 1 (in Russian).

14. Kurilla I. Amerikancy i vse ostal’nye: istoki i smysl vneshnej politiki SShA [Americans and Everyone Else: The Origins and Meaning of US Foreign Policy]. M., 2024 (in Russian).

15. March J., Olsen J. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. L.; N.Y., 1989.

16. McCombs M., Shaw D. The agenda-setting function of mass media // The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972. Vol. 36. N 2.

17. Milbrath L.W. Lobbying as a communications process // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1960. Vol. 24. N 1.

18. Mills Ch.R. Vlastvujushhaja jelita [Power elite]. M., 1959 (in Russian).

19. Mintusov I.E., Filatova O.G. Jetika GR-kommunikacij v obshheevropejskoj i rossijskoj praktike: sravnitel’nyj analiz [Ethics of GR communications in pan-European and Russian practice: comparative analysis] // Vestnik SPbGU. 2015. Ser. 9. Vyp. 4 (in Russian).

20. Nastase A., Muurmans C. Regulating lobbying activities in the European Union: a voluntary club perspective // Regulation & Governance. 2020. N 14.

21. Obshhaja sociologija. Osnovy sovremennoj sociologicheskoj teorii [General sociology. Fundamentals of modern sociological theory] / Ed. by N.G. Osipova. M., 2017 (in Russian).

22. Pavroz A.V. Gruppa interesov i lobbizm v politike [Interest groups and lobbying in politics]. SPb., 2006 (in Russian).

23. Pavroz A.V. Jeticheskij principy lobbizma v uslovijah sovremennoj demokratii [Ethical principles of lobbying in modern democracy] // POLITJeKS. 2015. T. 11. N 2 (in Russian).

24. Schattschneider E.E. Politics, pressures and the tariff. N.Y., 1935.

25. Spenser G. Razvitie politicheskih uchrezhdenij [Development of political institutions]. SPb., 1882 (in Russian).

26. Truman D. The governmental process: political interests and public opinion. N.Y., 1971.

27. Vasil’eva S.V. Civilizovannyj lobbizm – sredstvo ili sledstvie bor’by s korrupciej [Civilized lobbying – a means or consequence of the fight against corruption] // Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. 2008. N 4 (in Russian).

28. Weiler F., Brandli M. Inside versus outside lobbying: how the institutional framework shapes the lobbying behaviour of interest groups // European Journal of Political Research. 2015. Vol. 54. Iss. 4.

29. Zdravomyslov A.G. Potrebnosti. Interesy. Cennosti [Needs. Interests. Values]. M., 1986 (in Russian).