COMMUNICATIVE TOLERANCE DISCOURSE

Tolerance, communication and theme repertoire are communicative discourse components. The dialogue relations of communicators in the process of their life activity reflect where socio-cultural specific characteristics. The speech structure of communication adherence to speech frames and the Principles of Cooperation and Politeness as indicators of tolerance and empathy. Language speakers share one discourse code as a condition of successful communication. Discourse activity represents information exchange in the process of achieving various socio-cultural and cognitive goals. Tolerance, in its term, includes communicators` mutual empathy as the main conditions of communication success. Communicative tolerance is presented as communicative behavior prescriptions, specific for various socio-cultural areas. Theme repertoire phenomenon means shared knowledge and interpretation of all social communication participants. The combination of global context and local ones acquire special significance. Contextual limitations reflect socio-cultural specifics and are determined by the existence of behavior stereotypes and their evaluation. Thus, each discourse component contributes to achieving social-communication goals.

1. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokah i rasprostranenii nacionalizma. M., 2001.

2. Asmolov A.G. Tolerantnost kak kultura v XXI veke. M., 2000.

3. Bakhtin M.M. Problemi rechevikh ganrov. M., 1986.

4. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M., 1986.

5. Berger P. Kul’turnaya dinamika globalizacii // Mnogolikaya globalizaciya. M., 2004.

6. Brown P., Levinson S. Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena // Questions and Politeness / Ed. by E.N. Goody. Cambridge, 1978. P. 56–289.

7. Buber M. Ya i Ty. M., 1993.

8. Curikova L.V. Problema estestvennosti diskursa v social’noj kommunikacii. Voronezh, 2002. S. 163.

9. Deik T.A. van. Yazik. Posnanie. Kommunikaciya. M., 1989.

10. Diyk van T.A. Options and attitudes in discourse comprehension // Language and comprehension. Amsterdam, 1982.

11. Drobigeva L.M. Sociologiya megetnicheskoy tolerantnosti. M., 2003.

12. Filyushkina S.N. Nacional’nyj stereotip v massovom soznanii i literature (opyt issledovatel’skogo podhoda) // Logos. 2005. N 4.

13. Giddens E. Uskol’zayushchij mir: kak globalizaciya menyaet nashu zhizn’. M., 2004.

14. Goffman E. Felicity’s condition // American Journal of Sociology. 1983. Vol. 89. N 1.

15. Goffman E. Analiz freimov. M., 2004.

16. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation // Syntax and Semantics. N.Y., 1975.

17. Grishaeva L.I. Precedentnyj tekst kak model’ osmysleniya dejstvitel’nosti // Soderzhanie edinic yazyka i teksta: Mezhvuz. sb. SPb., 2003.

18. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs. M., 2004.

19. Lotman Yu.M. Vnutri myslyashchih mirov. Chelovek-tekst-semiosfera-istoriya. M., 1996.

20. Mogilevich B.R. Megkulturnaya kommunikaciya v sisteme sociologicheskogo znaniya. Saratov, 2008.

21. Mogilevich B.R. Osobennosti diskursa megkulturnoi kommunikacii // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta drugbi narodov. 2009. N 1. P. 43–48.

22. Mogilevich B.R. Socialnaya aktualizaciya dialoga // Izvestiya Volgogradsk. gos. tech. un-ta: Megvuz. sb. nauch. st. Ser. Problemi socialno-gumanitarnogo znaniya. 2013. Vol. 13. N 9 (112). P. 53–56.

23. Seribs L., Kendall J., Woodward J. Locating cosmopolitanism: between humanist ideals and grounded social category // Theory, culture and society. 2004. Vol. 21. N 6.

24. Shtompka P. Sociologiya social’nyh izmenenij. M., 1996.

25. Slyshkin G.G. Ot teksta k simvolu: lingvokul’turnye koncepty precendentnyh tekstov v soznanii i diskursah. M., 2000.

26. Sternin I.A. Tolerantnost i kommunikacii // Filosofskie i kulturologicheskie problemi tolerantnosti. M., 2005.

27. Sternin I.A. Yazyk i nacional’noe soznanie // Logos. 2005. N 4 (49).