“IDENTITY” IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY

The problem of identity has come to the fore of contemporary societies in the conditions when the institutional structures of these societies their ascriptive statuses have become looser when modernity is “liquid”, “soft”. Varions conceptualizations of identity are becoming a basic part of contemporary sociological theory. The paper aims to reveal the key problems that sociology faces when striving to work out a theory of identity. The paper takes as its starting point the classic notion of identity. This notion was shaped by Erik Erikson on the basis of his dynamic psychology. The paper proves that the contemporary identity is connected with the process of individualization in modern societies. Numerous and varied studies of contemporary identity can be divided into three large groups according to three methodological approaches: constructivist, postmodern and interactionist. The paper compares the major theories based on these approaches and reveals their theoretical and methodological problems. The paper shows that the constructivist approach is based on the notion of reflexivity which is viewed as a mechanism of identity formation by an individual. Identity is a reflexive project which is being realized in a conscious manner. The postmodern theories of identity reveal the fragmentation incompleteness of ego-identitity and it’s narcissic decay. They also reveal the inability of the individual to solve the problem of continuity and unity of her (his) own personality. Identity as a notion is replaced by the notion of identification which reduces identity to varions modes of repsentation. The interactionist methodology conld open up the way to tackle, the problem of individual’s unity and continuity as the main problem of human existence. This is the condition of the individual’s psychic and social health.

1. Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. M., 2005.

2. Baumeister R. Identity. Cultural change and the struggle for self. N.Y.; Oxford, 1986.

3. Corcuff Ph. Vers une théorie générale de l’individualisme contemporain occidental // L’individu aujourdoui / Sous la direction de Ph. Corcuff, Chr. Le Barth, F. De Singly. Rennes, 2010. P. 329–338.

4. Debor G. Obshchestvo spektaklya. M., 2000.

5. Erikson E. Identity and the life cycle. N.Y.; L., 1994.

6. Erikson E. Young man Luther. A study in Psychoanalysis and history. N.Y., 1958.

7. Friedmann J. Order and disorder in global systems: a sketch // Social research. 1993. Vol. 60. N 2.

8. Gerhardt V. Selbstbestimmug. Stuttgart, 1999.

9. Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity. Stanford, 1991.

10. Giddens A. The transformation of intimacy. Stanford, 1992.

11. Giddens E. Uskol’zayushchii mir: kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn’. M., 2004.

12. Giddens E. Posledstviya sovremennosti. M., 2011.

13. Kaufmann J.-Cl. L’invention de soi. Une theorie de l’identité. P., 2007.

14. Kaufmann J.-Cl. La force structurante d’une illusion: l’individu // L’individu aujourdoui / Sous la direction de Ph. Corcuff, Chr. Le Barth, F. De Singly. Rennes, 2010. P. 247–254.

15. Kimelev Yu.A. “Sub’’ekt” i “sub’’ektivnost’” v sovremennoi zapadnoi sotsial’noi filosofii. M., 2006.

16. Kimelev Yu.A. Zapadnaya filosofskaya antropologiya na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov. M., 2007.

17. Kimelev Yu.A. Metodologiya sotsial’nykh nauk. M., 2011.

18. Kimelev Yu.A. Filosofiya sotsial’nykh nauk. M., 2013.

19. Kimelev Yu.A. Filosofiya i sotsiologicheskaya teoriya. Sfery vzaimodeistviya. M., 2015.

20. Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Sotsiologicheskie teorii moderna, radikalizirovannogo moderna i postmoderna. M., 1996.

21. Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Filosofiya sotsial’nykh nauk // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2014. N 1. S. 20–46.

22. Marc E. La construction identitaire de l’individu // Identité (S). L’individu, le groupe, la societé / Coordonné par C. Halpern. P., 2009. P. 28–35.

23. Polyakova N.L. XX vek v sotsiologicheskikh teoriyakh obshchestva. M., 2004. Redeker R. Egobody. La fabrique de l’homme nouveau. P., 2010.

24. Rodriguez M. La conciencia y la acción: observaciones sobre el concepto de persona // Pensando la mente / Ed. by F. Chacon, G.M. Rodrigues. Madrid, 2000. P. 357–381.

25. Runciman W.G. The social animal. Ann Arbor, 2000.

26. Schilling Ch. The body and social theory. Los Angeles; L.; New Delhi; Sin-gapore; 2012.

27. Searle J.R. Mind, languague and society. L., 1999

28. Searle J.R. Making the social world. N.Y., 2010.

29. Sibilia P. El hombre postorganico. Cuerpo, subjetividad y tecnologias digi-tales. Buenos Aires, 2005.

30. Taylor Ch. Sources of the self. Cambridge, 1989.

31. Touraine A. Critique de la modernité. P., 1992.

32. Turner Br.S. The body and society. Los Andeles; L.; New Delhi; Singapore, 2008.

33. Vattimo G. La fine della modernita. Roma, 1999.

34. Waldenfels B. Das leibliche Selbst. Frankfurt a/M., 2000.