Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES OF THE SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY OF POETRY (the use of semantic differentials in sociopoetics)

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-1-160-173

Abstract

In sociology, literature, along with the study of the content of works of art and social characteristics of characters it is important to study the creative process. Here is an attempt to look at the poetry writing and its results through the prism of the behavioral approach on the basis of the poetry content analysis. Creation of the poem is considered as a behavioral creative process of self-actualization of creative potential, interactions of the system of requirements and social situations verbally expressed by means of language. During the framing actualized thoughts and feelings of the poet translated into poetic form. The main hypothesis is that the emotional dissonance express itself poetically. Semantic differential (SD) technique provides a clue to the text. Content analysis of poems (cycles, books) of separate poets through SD method could provide the understanding of similarities and differences of successive stages of the creating creative process of the same master, or explain the dissimilarity of poets compared to each other. The analysis of separate poems of Blok, Gumilev, Yesenin, Akhmatova ect. may demonstrate style features, the individual originality of each poets considered in terms of the dialectic opposition. The article discusses the possibilities of the SD method and the antonyms scales search in the author’s text in the study of the creative process, based on the characteristics of the poetry of classical Russian poet Alexander Blok.

About the Author

A. I. Antonov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Antonov Anatoly Ivanovich, doctor of philosophical science, professor faculty of sociology


References

1. Antonov A.I. Sociologija rozhdaemosti [Sociology of fertility]. M., 1980 (in Russian).

2. Antonov A.I. Mikrosociologija sem’i [Microsociology family]. M., 1998 (in Russian).

3. Apresjan Ju.D. Leksicheskaja semantika [Lexical semantics]. M., 1974 (in Russian).

4. Azarova N.M. Jazyk filosofii i jazyk pojezii – dvizhenie navstrechu (gram-matika, leksika, tekst) [Language philosophy and language of poetry - the movement forward (grammar, vocabulary, text)]. M., 2010 (in Russian).

5. Bahtin M.M. Jestetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The aesthetics of verbal creativity]. M., 1979 (in Russian).

6. Beljanin V.P. Psiholingvistika [Psycholinguistics]. M., 2011 (in Russian). Blok A.A. Jeho: stihotvorenija 1898–1908 gg. [ECHO: poems 1898–1908 gg.

7. Compiled by Kuramzhina I. ECHO: poems 1898-1908 gg.] / Red.-sost. I.A. Ku-ramzhina [Compiled by Kuramzhina I.]. M., 1995 (in Russian).

8. Blok A.A. Stihi o Prekrasnoj Dame [Poems about the Beautiful Lady]. SPb., 2010 (in Russian).

9. Familisticheskie issledovanija [Familistic research]. T. 1. M., 2009 (in Russian).

10. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskah smysla [Man’s search]. M., 1990 (in Russian).

11. Gadamer G.G. Aktual’nost’ prekrasnogo [Artworks in word and image: ‘so true, so full of being]. M., 1991 (in Russian).

12. Girenok F. Udovol’stvie myslit’ inache [Pleasure of another thinking]. M., 2008 (in Russian).

13. Gofman I. Analiz frejmov [Analysis of frames]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

14. Gridina T.A. Jazykovaja igra: stereotip i tvorchestvo [Language game: stereotype and creation]. Ekaterinburg, 1996 (in Russian).

15. Kantorovich V. Rodstvennaja nam nauka [Related science] // LG. 1966. N 53 (in Russian).

16. Kantorovich V. Perepis’ literaturnogo naselenija [On behalf of the literature population] // LG. 1967. N 33 (in Russian).

17. Kantorovich V. Ot imeni literaturnogo nasledija [List of literature population] // LG. 1968. N 31 (in Russian).

18. Kozeleckij Ju. Psihologicheskaja teorija reshenij [Psychological decision theory]. M., 1979 (in Russian).

19. Lenuar R., Merl’e D., Pjento L., Shampan’ P. Nachala prakticheskoj sociologii [Besic of sociology]. SPb., 2001 (in Russian).

20. Leont’ev A.A. Osnovy psiholingvistiki [Basics of psiholinguistic]. M., 1997 (in Russian).

21. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif [Sign. Symbol. Myth]. M., 1982 (in Russian).

22. Lotman Ju.M. Analiz pojeticheskogo teksta [Analysis of the poetic text]. L., 1972 (in Russian).

23. Mol’ A. Sociodinamika kul’tury [Sociodynamic of culture]. M., 1973 (in Russian).

24. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psihosemantiki [Basics psihosemantiki]. M., 2010 (in Russian).

25. Potebnja A.A. Slovo i mif [The word and the myth]. M., 1989 (in Russian).

26. Propp V. Problemy komizma i smeha [Problem of comedy and laughter]. M., 2002 (in Russian).

27. Semiotika i iskusstvometrija [Semiotics and dimension of Art] / Red.

28. Ju.M. Lotman [Ed. by Yu. Lotman]. M., 1972 (in Russian).

29. Shalak V.I. Sovremennyj kontent-analiz [The contemporary content analysis]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

30. Sidorova M.Ju. Grammatika pojeticheskogo teksta [Grammar of the poetic text]. M., 2000 (in Russian).

31. Solso R. Kognitivnaja psihologija [Cognitive psychology]. M., 1996 (in Rus-sian).

32. Tarshis E.Ja. Konten-analiz. Principy metodologii [Content analysis. Meto-dology]. M., 2013 (in Russian).

33. Tynjanov Ju.N. Problema stihotvornogo jazyka [The problem of poem]. M., 2007 (in Russian).

34. Vygotskij L.S. Psihologija iskusstva [The psychology of art]. M., 1968 (in Russian).

35. Zinchenko V.P. Posoh Mandel’shtama i trubka Mamardashvili. M., 1997 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Antonov A.I. METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES OF THE SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY OF POETRY (the use of semantic differentials in sociopoetics). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2017;23(1):160-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-1-160-173

Views: 1525


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)