SOCIOCULTURAL DYNAMIC OF MODERNITY: INTERACTION AND IMPACT OF MIGRATION AND SPORTS
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-1-208-224
Abstract
This article analyzes the driving factors of socio-cultural dynamics of modernity, as one of which examines migration and its consequences. Recent wave of refugees’ giant stream from the Middle East, mainly Islamic religion, hit the quiet and secured Western Europe that was the object of their aspirations. The countries of Western Europe priority oriented on secular values are radically far from the familiar world of migrants, which exacerbates for the latter a problem of transitional period.Active participation in various forms of sports interaction and success achievement in this field is proposed and grounded in the article as the optimal way of effective inculturation of migrants in the European community. The attempt to use sport as an element of cultural innovation has been made repeatedly which shows its creative potential. Various tendencies, such as Taylorism, futurism (Russian and European), fascism, Soviet “anthroposociology”, functionalism and ideological movement of technocrats actively exploited symbols, images, features and ideas of sport. The field of sport acts as a space of opportunities for exercise, playback and development of behavior patterns as for specific individuals and for certain social groups with the subsequent carrying over to real life with a certain degree of success.
About the Author
M. V. AverinaRussian Federation
Averina Marina Vladimirovna, doctor in cultural anthropology, PhD in sociology, associate professor, associate professor of the chair of culturology, sociocultural anthropology and social communications
References
1. Ajzenberg K. Otkrytie sporta sovremennoj istoricheskoj naukoj [The discovery of sports by modern historical science] // Logos. 2009. N 6 (73). S. 82–98 (in Russian).
2. Ajhberg H. Social’noe konstruirovanie vremeni i prostranstva kak vozvrashhe-nie sociologii k filosofii [The social construction of time and space as a return of sociology to philosophy] // Logos. 2006. N 3 (54). S. 76–90 (in Russian).
3. Artanovskij S.N. Problema “lichnosti na rubezhe kul’tur” [The problem of “identity at the turn of cultures”] // Voprosy filosofii [The Questions of Philosophy]. 1967. N 7 (in Russian).
4. Aslamova D. Svetoprestavlenie v Starom Svete: Evropu zahlestnuli polchishha alchnyh migrantov [Doomsday in the Old World: Europe has been swept by hordes of greedy migrants]. URL: http://best.kp.ru/msk/europe_migrants/ (data obrashhenija: 06.03.2016) (in Russian).
5. Ban’kovskaja S.P. Robert Park [Robert Park] // Sovremennaja amerikanskaja sociologija [Contemporary American Sociology]. M., 1994 (in Russian).
6. Byhovskaja I.M. Sport v sovremennom mire: sociokul’turnyj analiz i social’naja praktika [Sports in the world today: sociocultural analysis and social practice] // Kul’turologija: fundamental’nye osnovanija prikladnyh issledovanij: Sb. st. [Cultural Studies: the Fundamental Basis of Applied Research: Collected Papers] / Pod red. I.M. Byhovskoj [Ed. by I.M. Bykhovskaya]. M., 2010 (in Russian).
7. Dunning E. Vorwort // Elias N., Dunning E. Sport und Spannung im Prozess der Zivilisation. Frankfurt a/M., 2003.
8. Franke E. Der moderne Sport – die zeitgemäße Religion der Jahrtausend-wende. 2006.
9. Gratton C. The economic importance of modern sport // Culture, Sport, Society. 1998. N 1 (1). P. 101–117.
10. Guttman A. Kapitalizm, protestantizm i sovremennyj sport [Capitalism, Protestantism and modern sport] // Logos. 2013. N 5 (95). C. 1–42 (in Russian).
11. Haled Abu Bakr. O bikini i hidzhabah na Olimpiade [About bikini and hijabs at the Olympics]. URL: http://inosmi.ru/social/20160817/237566800.html (data obrashhenija: 17.08.2016) (in Russian).
12. Inghjem B., Fajad Dzh. Arabskie strany. Obychai i jetiket [Customs & etiquette of Arabia and Gulf states]. M., 2009 (in Russian).
13. Jelias N. Genezis sporta kak sociologicheskaja problema // Logos. 2006. N 3 (54) (in Russian).
14. Klipin D. Bah podygral migrantam. Kak u Olimpiady–2016 v Rio-de-Zhanejro pojavilas’ bol’shaja “evropejskaja” problema [Bach played along the migrants. How the Olympics 2016 in Rio de Janeiro gained a big “European” problem]. URL: http://lenta.ru/articles/2016/01/29/olympicsrefugee (data obrashhenija: 29.01.2016) (in Russian).
15. Kravchenko S.A. Riski v nelinejnom globolokal’nom sociume [Risks in the non-linear globolocal society]. M., 2009 (in Russian).
16. Labidi A. Politiko-ideologicheskaja znachimost’ Panarabskih igr [Political and ideological significance of the Pan Arab games] // Fizicheskoe vospitanie studentov tvorcheskih special’nostej [Physical education of students of creative specialties. Collection of proceedings]. 2005. N 6. S. 26–34 (in Russian).
17. Lang C. Egyptian women’s volleyball team competed in hijab for their first Olympic game. URL: http://time.com/4443905/rio-olympics-2016-volleyball (accessed: 10.08.2016).
18. Matvejchev O. Pod pokrovom Olimpiady [Under cover of the Olympics]. URL: http://izvestia.ru/news/625148#ixzz4GMX6IAtk (data obrashhenija: 10.08.2016) (in Russian).
19. Na izlomah social’noj struktury [On the breaks of social structure] / Ruk. avt. koll. A.A. Galkin [Lead author A.A. Galkin]. M., 1987 (in Russian).
20. Olimpijskie igry dlja islamskih zhenshhin: atletika i mini-futbol v chadre [Olympic games for Islamic women: track and field athletics and mini-football in a chador]. URL: http://www.ivsporte.ru/page_377.htm (data obrashhenija: 25.05.2009) (in Russian).
21. Park R.E. Human migration and the marginal man // The American Journal of Sociology. 1928. Vol. XXXIII. N 6. P. 882–893.
22. Plessner H. Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch // Gesammelte Schriften. Frankfurt a/M., 1981.
23. Popova I.P. Marginal’nost’. Sociologicheskij analiz [The marginality. Sociological analysis]. M., 1996 (in Russian).
24. Sambur V. Sbornaja bezhencev na Olimpiade. Istorija sirijskoj plovchihi i drugih bezhencev, kotorye vystupjat otdel’noj komandoj na Olimpiade–2016 [Refugee team at the Olympics. The story of Syrian swimmer and other refugees who will participate in the 2016 Olympics as a separate team]. URL: http://sport.rbc.ru/article/268848/?utm_source=gismeteo&utm_medium=news&utm_campaign=gism_top15 (data obrashhenija: 24.03.2016) (in Russian).
25. Sociologija sporta. Mezhdunarodnye perspektivy i globalizacija [Sociology of sport. International perspectives and globalization] / Pod red. F. Olja [Ed. by F. Olya]. M., 2006 (in Russian).
26. Sport v Islame [Sports in Islam] // Islam. 2009. N 21 (01). URL: http://www.islam.ru/content/veroeshenie/43592 (data obrashhenija: 31.01.2016) (in Russian).
27. Stounkvist Je.V. Marginal’nyj chelovek: issledovanie lichnosti i kul’turnogo konflikta [Marginal man: a study of personality and cultural conflict] // Li-chnost’. Kul’tura. Obshhestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. 2006. T. 8. Vyp. 1. S. 9–36 (in Russian).
28. Tjazhlov I., Tumanov G., Sabitova A. O vseobshhem zhenskom obrezanii muftij skazal “prosto tak” [About overall female circumcision mufti said “just like that”]. URL: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3065877 (data obrashhenija: 17.08.2016) (in Russian).
29. Voronin V., Kiselev N. Stadiony bombili, sportsmenov ubivali. Futbol v Sirii [Stadiums were bombed, athletes were murdered. Football in Syria]. URL: http://sport.rbc.ru/article/268220/?utm_source=gismeteo&utm_medium=news&utm_ campaign=gism_top23 (data obrashhenija: 10.03.2016) (in Russian).
30. Zvereva V. Televizionnyj sport [TV sports] // Logos. 2006. N 3 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Averina M.V. SOCIOCULTURAL DYNAMIC OF MODERNITY: INTERACTION AND IMPACT OF MIGRATION AND SPORTS. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2017;23(1):208-224. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2017-23-1-208-224