Political culture as a factor of civilized lobbying establishment in contemporary Russia

The article is devoted to the study of civilized lobbyism formation in contemporary Russia in the context of the political culture peculiarities. The author explains the use of the concept of “civilized lobbyism” from the standpoint of the presence of various interpretations of lobbying in political science, which prevents a clear separation of legitimate and illegitimate forms of interests’ representation, while the object of research is primarily the legal technologies of influence on power. Political culture is regarded as one of the subjective factors determining the functioning of the mechanisms of interests’ representation in the political system, as well as the specifics of lobbying activities in each particular state. The influence of political culture on the process of lobbying in Russia is analyzed not only at the level of political orientations and behavior of individuals and groups, but also at the level of institutional structures. To study the impact of the political culture on the formation of social practices of lobbying, the author refers to the institutional concept of D. North, in which the mechanism of functioning of social and political institutions is revealed through the correlation of formal and informal rules, norms, attitudes and behaviours. In the context of the development of the democratic representation of interests in contemporary Russia particular attention is given to the problem of preserving and dominating historically established authoritarian orientations in the relations of society and power, as well as the traditions of paternalism and clientellism. However, the author believes that it is not correct to reduce the influence from the political culture mostly to the national traditions. It is concluded that the fundamental condition for the development of civilized lobbying in present day Russia is the is the parallel formation of legal foundations and the corresponding matrix of political culture, both at the level of subjects of lobbying relations and at the level of interests’ representation institutions.

lobbyism, political culture, political traditions, political institution, political system, corruption, social control

1. Almond G., Verba S. Grazhdanskaja kul’tura. Podhod k izucheniju politicheskoj kul’tury [Civic culture. Approach to the study of political culture] // Politija. [Politia]. 2010. N 1–2, 3–4 (in Russian).

2. Batalov Е.Y. Politicheskaja kul’tura Rossii skvoz’ prizmu civic culture [The political culture of Russia through the prism of civic culture] // Pro et Contra. 2002. T. 7. N 3 (in Russian).

3. Fel’dman P.Y. Nuzhen li v Rossii zakon o lobbizme? [Does Russia need a law on lobbying?] // Vlast’. [Power]. 2014. N 2. S. 119–123 (in Russian).

4. Kanevskij P.S. Razvitie lobbizma v Rossii: teorija i praktika [Development of lobbying in Russia: Theory and Practice] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologija i politologija. 2015. N 4. C. 119–133 (in Russian).

5. Karpova N.V. Sociologija politicheskoj kul’tury [Sociology of political culture]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

6. Karpova N.V. Politicheskaja kul’tura kak strukturnyj jelement mehanizma funkcionirovanija politicheskih sistem [Political culture as a structural element of the mechanism of functioning of political systems] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologija i politologija. 2016. N 1. C. 182–199 (in Russian).

7. Kiselev K. Lobbizm: metody legal’nogo vlijanija [Lobbying: the methods of legal influence] // Chinovnik. 2002. N 6. URL: http://chinovnik.uapa.ru/ru/issue/2002/06/05/ (in Russian).

8. Kojen G. L., Arato G. Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo i politicheskaja teorija [Civil society and political theory] / Obsh. red. I.I. Mjurberg. M., 2003 (in Russian).

9. Nort D. Instituty, institucional’nye izmenenija i funkcionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy]. M., 1997 (in Russian).

10. Lukin A.V., Lukin P.V. Umom Rossiju ponimat’ [Understanding Russia by the mind]. M., 2015 (in Russian).

11. Omel’chenko N.A. Istorija gosudarstvennogo upravlenija v Rossii: uch. [History of Public Administration in Russia: a Textbook]. M., 2005 (in Russian).

12. Pain E.A., Sharafutdinova D.E. Mnozhestvennaja sovremennost’: osobennosti bjurokraticheskoj ierarhii i korrupcii v obshhestvah s klanovymi tradicijami [Multiple modernity: peculiarities of bureaucratic hierarchy and corruption in societies with clan traditions] // Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2017. N 2. S. 91–103 (in Russian).

13. Pajps R. Rossija pri starom rezhime [Russia under the old regime]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

14. Pavroz A.V. Institut lobbizma v sovremennyh demokraticheskih obshhestvah [Institute of lobbyism in modern democratic societies] // POLITEKS. 2014. T. 10. N 3. S. 158–169 (in Russian).

15. Tolmachjova I.V. Dinamika formirovanija instituta lobbizma v Rossii [Dynamics of formation of the institute of lobbying in Russia] // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2017. N 6. S. 88–93 (in Russian).

16. Tolstyh P.A. Lobbizm kak korrupcionnaja tehnologija [Lobbyism as Corrupt Technology] // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul’turologija i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Issues of theory and practice]. 2012. N 6 (20). Ch II. S. 205–213 (in Russian).

17. Turanov S. Luchshie lobbisty Rossii — pervyj kvartal 2018 goda [Top lobbyists Russia — first quarter 2018] // NG. 2018.16.05 (in Russian).

18. Zaslavskaja T.I. Sovremennoe rossijskoe obshhestvo: Social’nyj mehanizm transformacii: Uch. posob. [Modern Russian Society: The Social Mechanism of Transformation: A Textbook]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

19. Zotov G. “Strana vzjatok”. Kak Iordanija smogla snizit’ uroven’ korrupcii? [“The country of bribes”. How did Jordan manage to reduce the level of corruption?] // AiF. 2015.19.05. URL: http://www.aif.ru/money/corruption/u_chertey_mnogo_deneg (in Russian).