Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Digital society: sociological perspective

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-175-192

Abstract

Based on the analysis of various theoretical positions in the framework of modern sociological theory, the article attempts to identify and describe the most important features of modern society. These features result from scientific and technical innovations of the first two decades of the 21st century, which are unprecedented in their scale and speed. The first part of the article discusses the factors that determine peculiarities of the observed social trends and changes. Further, within the Triple Revolution concept, these factors receive a sociological interpretation. It is concluded that modernity can be read through its basic characteristics such as: growing complexity of the social system, mobility, network expansion, increased connectedness and digitalization. These characteristics of modernity demonstrate the onset of the era of digital society.

About the Author

D. E. Dobrinskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Dobrinskaya Darya E. – Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor at the Department of Modern Sociology, Faculty of Sociology

Leninskiye Gory, 1-33, Moscow, 119234



References

1. Chayko M. Superconnected: the Internet, digital media, and techno-social life. Newbury Park, 2017.

2. Dijk van J.A. The network society: social aspects of new media. Newbury Park, 2006.

3. Elliott A., Urry J. Mobile Lives // Mobile Lives. L.; N.Y., 2010.

4. Idrisov G.I. i dr. Novaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [New technological revolution: Challenges and opportunities for Russia] // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018. N 4. S. 5–25 (in Russian).

5. Khalin V.G., Chernova G.V. Tsifrovizatsiya i ee vliyanie na rossiiskuyu ekonomiku i obshchestvo: preimushchestva, vyzovy, ugrozy i riski [Digitalization and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks] // Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie [Administrative Consulting]. 2018. N 10. P. 46–63 (in Russian).

6. Khanna P. Connectography: mapping the future of global civilization. N.Y., 2016.

7. Kimelev Yu.A. Sotsiologiya Dzhona Urri [John Urry’s Sociology] // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. 2001. Vol. 1. N 1. P. 25–35 (in Russian).

8. Knyaginin V.N. i dr. Novaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [New technological revolution: Challenges and opportunities for Russia]. Ekspertno-analiticheskii doklad. M., 2017 (in Russian).

9. Kravchenko S.A. Igraizatsiya rossiiskogo obshchestva (K obosnovaniyu novoi sotsiologicheskoi paradigmy) // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2002. N 6. P. 143–155 (in Russian).

10. Kravchenko S.A. Sotsiologicheskaya “strela vremeni” v XXI veke: innovatsii v materialakh Vsemirnykh sotsiologicheskikh kongressov [The sociological “arrow of time” in the XXI century: innovations in materials from Global sociology conventions] // Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. 2018. Vol. 9. N 4. P. 84–104 (in Russian).

11. Lupton D. Digital sociology. N.Y., 2015.

12. Martynenko T.S. Teoriya global’nogo sotsial’nogo neravenstva v sotsiologii mobil’nostei Dzhona Urri [Theory of global social inequality in the sociology of mobility by John Urry] // Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. 2015. № 1. P. 85–91 (in Russian).

13. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. Machine, platform, crowd: harnessing our digital future. N.Y., 2017.

14. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. The Second Machine Age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. N.Y., 2016.

15. Negroponte N. Being digital. Kent, 1995.

16. Noritsugu U. Obshchestvo 5.0: vzglyad Mitsubishi Electric [5.0 Society from Mitsubishi Electric perspective] // Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic Strategies]. 2017. N 4. P. 2–11 (in Russian).

17. Osipov G.V. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka v usloviyakh stanovleniya tsifrovoi tsivilizatsii [Sociological science in the development of digital civilization]. SPb., 2016 (in Russian).

18. Polyakova N.L. Novye teoreticheskie perspektivy v sotsiologii nachala XXI v. [New theoretical perspectives in sociology at the beginning of the 21 st century] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya [Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2015. N 2. P. 29–46 (in Russian).

19. Prigogine I. Konets opredelennosti. Vremya, khaos i novye zakony prirody [The end of certainty. Time, chaos and new laws of nature]. Izhevsk, 2000 (in Russian).

20. Rainie H., Wellman B. Networked: the new social operating system. Cambridge, 2012.

21. Schwab K., Davis N. Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution. N.Y., 2018.

22. Sheller M. Novaya paradigma mobil’nostei v sovremennoi sotsiologii [The new mobility paradigm in modern sociology] // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2016. Vol. 3–11. N 7 (in Russian).

23. Shentseva E.A. Ponyatie “set” kak ob’’ekt filosofskogo osmysleniya [The concept of “network” as a subject of philosophical understanding] // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A.S. Pushkina. Seriya “Filosofiya”. 2011. Vol. 2. N 2. P. 147–156 (in Russian).

24. Triple Revolution: cybernation. Weaponry. Human Rights // Liberation. 1964. С. 9–15. URL: http://www.educationanddemocracy.org/FSCfiles/C_CC2a_TripleRevolution.htm (accessed: 05.05.2019).

25. Urry J. Global complexity. Cambridge; Oxford, 2003.

26. Urry J. Kak vyglyadit budushchee? [What is the Future] M., 2018 (in Russian). Urry J. Mobil’nosti [Mobilities]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

27. Vasilkova V. Seti v sotsial’nom poznanii: ot metafory k metateorii [Networks in social knowledge: from metaphor to metatheory] // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. 2012. Vol. 15. N 5. P. 11–24 (in Russian).

28. Vershinina I.A., Dobrinskaya D.E. Pax urbanica: goroda v usloviyakh global’noi setevoi tsivilizatsii [Pax Urbanica: cities in global network civilization] // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo [Information society]. 2018. N 1. P. 25–33 (in Russian).

29. Wallerstein I. Konets znakomogo mira: sotsiologiya XXI veka [The End of the World As We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-first Century]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

30. Wallerstein I. Open the social sciences: report of the Gulbenkian commission on the restructuring of the social sciences. Stanford, 1996.


Review

For citations:


Dobrinskaya D.E. Digital society: sociological perspective. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2019;25(4):175-192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-175-192

Views: 4390


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)