Political sociology and political management in the subject field of political science
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-209-226
Abstract
The article deals with the methodological problems of transformation processes in political science in the late XIX-th-early XX centuries and in the period between the two world wars. The author reveals the causes and origins of the crisis phenomena in political science due to the new political realities in the world and new trends in the political science development. The process of modern political science formation is analyzed in its gradual development (formal-legal, traditional, behavioral and post-behavioral). The special role of the Chicago revolution in political science, which created the environment and the ground for the emergence of the “behavioral” revolution, is revealed. The main program provisions of the “behavioral” revolution are indicated, its results, the main vectors of political science development in the post-behavioral era are revealed.
The role of structural functionalism (G. Almond and his school) in the formation of modern political science is revealed. The article deals with the interaction of political science with related social disciplines, which led to the emergence of some hybrid disciplines of political knowledge, including political sociology and political management. The content of the hybridization concept is revealed. The role of sociology in this process as the “main donor” of political science in the considered era is revealed. Object-subject areas of political sociology and political management, their place and role in the mechanism of socio-political systems functioning in the subject field of political science are defined. Generalizing conclusions are made.
About the Author
N. S. Fedorkin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fedorkin Nikolay S. – Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Political Science and Sociology of Political Processes, Faculty of Sociology
Leninskiye Gory, 1-33, Moscow, 119234
References
1. Abuchakra R., Huri M. Effektivnoe pravitel’stvo dlya novogo veka: reformirovanie gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sovremennom mire [Effective government for the new century: public administration reforming in the modern world]. M., 2016 (in Russian).
2. Almond G.A. Politicheskaya nauka: istoriya discipliny [Political science: history of discipline] // Politicheskaya nauka: novye napravleniya [Political science: new directions] / Pod red. R. Gudina, H.-D. Klingemanna. M., 1999 (in Russian).
3. Amelin V.N. Sociologiya politiki [Sociology of politics]. M., 1992 (in Russian).
4. Dogan M. Politicheskaya nauka i drugie social’nye nauki [Political science and other social sciences] // Politicheskaya nauka: novye napravleniya [Political science: new directions] / Pod red. R. Gudina, H.-D. Klingemanna. M., 1999 (in Russian).
5. Dogan M. Sociologiya sredi social’nyh nauk [Sociology among social sciences] // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research]. 2010. N 10 (in Russian).
6. Fedorkin N.S. Metodologicheskij potencial sravnitel’nyh issledovanij politicheskih sistem [Methodological potential of political systems’ comparative research] // Prostranstvo i Vremya [Space and Time]. 2013. N 3(13) (in Russian).
7. Fedorkin N.S. Specifika sociologii mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij (SMO) v kontekste diskussij o predmete politicheskoj sociologii [Particularity of sociology of international relations (SMO) in the context of discussions on the subject of political sociology] // Gibridizaciya mirovoj i vneshnej politiki v svete sociologii mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij [Hybridization of world and foreign policy in the light of sociology of international relations] / Pod red. P.A. Cygankova. M., 2017 (in Russian).
8. Gosudarstvennaya politika: Uchebnoe posobie [State policy: Textbook] // Pod red. A.I. Solov’eva. M., 2012 (in Russian).
9. Gudin R., Klingemann H.-D. Politicheskaya nauka kak disciplina [Political science as a discipline] // Politicheskaya nauka: novye napravleniya [Political science: new directions] / Pod red. R.Gudina, H.-D. Klingemanna. M., 1999 (in Russian).
10. Iston D. Politicheskaya nauka v Soedinennyh Shtatah: proshloe i nastoyashchee [Political science in the United States: past and present] // Sovremennaya sravnitel’naya politologiya. Hrestomatiya [Modern comparative politics. Chrestomathy]. M., 1997 (in Russian).
11. Lipset M. Politicheskaya sociologiya [Political sociology] // Amerikanskaya sociologiya. Perspektivy, problemy, metody [American sociology. Prospects, problems, methods]. M., 1972 (in Russian).
12. Lipset M. Politicheskij chelovek: social’nye osnovaniya politiki. Rasshirennoe izdanie [Political man: the social bases of politics. Extended edition]. M., 2016 (in Russian).
13. Mer P. Sravnitel’naya politologiya: obshchie problemy [Comparative political science: general problems] // Politicheskaya nauka: novye napravleniya [Political science: new directions] / Pod red. R. Gudina, H.-D. Klingemanna. M., 1999 (in Russian).
14. Pushkareva G.V. Politicheskij menedzhment: Uchebnoe posobie [Political management: Textbook]. M., 2002 (in Russian).
15. Starostin B.S. Problema modernizacii: istoriya i sovremennost’ [The problem of modernization: history and modernity] // Modernizaciya i nacional’naya kul’tura. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara [Modernization and national culture. Materials of the theoretical seminar]. M., 1995 (in Russian).
16. Vil’son V. Nauka gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Public administration science] // Klassiki teorii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: amerikanskaya shkola [Classics of public administration theory: American school] / Pod red. Dzh.S hafritca, A. Hajda. M., 2003 (in Russian).
17. Volodenkov S.V. Upravlenie sovremennymi politicheskimi kampaniyami [Management of modern political campaigns]. M., 2012 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Fedorkin N.S. Political sociology and political management in the subject field of political science. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2019;25(4):209-226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-209-226
Views:
1629
Email this article 