Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Transformations of corporatism in neoliberal era

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-265-278

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the formation and current state of corporatism in Western European countries. Author shows how the evolution of corporatism took place since the XIX century and how corporatism was transforming during the XX century. Particular attention is paid to the last stage of the development of corporatism, which is associated with the evolution of neoliberalism and political pluralism. Corporatism is seen as a form of interaction between organized groups of society and the state, and as a political-ideological category rooted in medieval social philosophy. Corporatism flourished in the post-war decades, when most of the countries of Western Europe took the path of creating vertically integrated associative groups representing the interests of the main socio-economic groups, primarily business and employees. At the same time, corporatism has always been built on a clear value foundation, which implies the pursuit of public interests and the equal distribution of resources among all parties of corporate agreements. The article shows how the onset of neoliberalism led to a reduction in the role of corporatism. Since the 1990s, in those countries that traditionally lined up to the process of agreeing on and adopting key political decisions on a corporate basis, there has been an obvious pluralisation of the systems of interest groups, which is increasingly replacing the tradition and practice of corporatism. At the same time, corporatism does not disappear; in many countries it remains an important element of collective bargaining, but its nature and content are changing. We can conclude that the classic concepts of corporatism are not able to fully explain its current state, it is necessary to use new approaches that could reveal the essence of the transformations taking place.

About the Author

P. S. Kanevskiy
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Kanevskiy Pavel S. - PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science and Sociology of Political Processes, Faculty of Sociology

Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow, 119234



References

1. Almond G. Corporatism, pluralism, and professional memory // World Politics. 1983. Vol. 35. N 2.

2. Bacarro L. What is dead and what is alive in the theory of corporatism? // British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2003. Vol. 41. Iss. 4.

3. Burns T., Carson M. European Union neo-corporatist, and pluralist governance arrangements: lobbying and policy-making patterns in a comparative perspective // International Journal of Regulation and Governance. 2002. N 2 (2).

4. Capling A. Corporatism // Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought / Ed. by P. Clarke, J. Foweraker. L.; N.Y., 2001.

5. Cawson A. Organized Interests and the State. Studies in Mesocorporatism. L., 1985.

6. Chelischev V.I. Liberalizm — neoliberalizm — rynochnyj fundamentalizm: ot koncepcii svobody k totalitarnoj dogme (okonchanie) [Liberalism — neoliberalism market fundamentalism: from the concept of freedom to totalitarian dogma (ending)] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2016. N 1 (in Russian).

7. Costa Pinto A. Corporatism and fascism: the corporatist wave in Europe. L.; N.Y., 2017.

8. Lehmbruch G. Liberal corporatism and party government // Trends towards Corporatist Intermediation / Ed. by P. Schmitter, G. Lehmbruch. L., 1979.

9. Mailand M. Dynamic neo-corporatism — regulating work and welfare in Denmark // Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2006. N 12 (3).

10. Meenan J. Corporatism in Italy // The Irish Monthly. 1936. Vol. 64. N 762.

11. Morck R., Yeung B. Corporatism and the ghost of the third way // Capitalism and Society. 2010. N 5 (3).

12. Noto S. Beyond the business cycle and socialism: the late Schumpeter’s corporatist view. SSRN. 2008. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1261910 (accessed: 15.05.2019).

13. Osipova N.G. Social’no-filosofskie osnovy (teoreticheskoe yadro) klassicheskogo liberalizma [Socio-philosophical foundations (theoretical core) of classical liberalism] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2015. N 4 (in Russian).

14. Pavroz A.V. Korporativizm: istoki, evolyuciya, sovremennoe sostoyanie [Corporatism: origins, evolution, current state] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2009. N 4 (in Russian).

15. Rommetvedt H., Thesen G., Christiansen P.M., Nørgaard A.S. Coping with corporatism in decline and the revival of parliament. Interest group lobbyism in Denmark and Norway, 1980–2005 // Comparative Political Studies. 2013. Vol. 46. Iss. 4.

16. Salmin M.S. Neokorporativizm v stranah Zapada [Neocorporatism in Western countries] // Politiya. 2005. N 3 (in Russian).

17. Schmitter F. Neokorporativizm [Neocorporatism] // Polis. 1997. N 2 (in Russian).

18. Schmitter P., Grote J. The Renaissance of national corporatism: unintended side-effect of European Economic and Monetary Union or calculated response to the absence of European social policy? // Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 1999. Vol. 5. Iss. 1–2.

19. Streeck W., Schitter P. From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: organized interests in the single European market // Politics & Society. 1991. Vol. 19. Iss. 2.

20. Visser J., Hemerijck A. “A Dutch Miracle” — job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, 1997.


Review

For citations:


Kanevskiy P.S. Transformations of corporatism in neoliberal era. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2019;25(4):265-278. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-4-265-278

Views: 1568


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)