Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Features of sociological analysis of religion in Russia during the imperial period of its history (Continued)

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2022-28-1-31-68

Abstract

The article deals with the features of sociological analysis of religion in Russia during the imperial period of its history. The national sociological tradition of studying religion as a socio-cultural phenomenon and a social institution, which was developed during this period, had its own unique and peculiar appearance and was just begun to revive again in post-Soviet Russia, contrasts with the tradition that took place in the West. In this context, the appeal to unfortunately undeservedly forgotten works of classics of Russian religious and socio-political though is very promising area of modern sociological research.

When studying this problem, the author emphasizes the study of the works of representatives of three ideological areas of Russian religious and socio-political thought: conservatism, liberalism and socialism, as well as the peculiarities of the historical development of Russian society and the state and those events that had a significant impact on the formation and development of scientific understanding of religion in Russia. Among such features, the author, in particular, refers to the formation of an “antisystem” (systemic integrity of people who take a dim view of their homeland, hate their own nation, its values and culture, history, traditional religious, political and social systems) among the Russian intelligentsia, bureaucracy and part of the elite of Russian society, under a certain influence of Westernism, as a consequence of the spiritual schism of the 18th century, which occurred in the educated strata and elite of Russian society.

When studying the features of understanding religious issues by representatives of Russian liberalism, the author of the article analyzes the views of representatives of both radical and moderate (classical) liberalism: M.M. Kovalevsky, N.I. Kareev, P.N. Milyukov, V.S. Solovyov, B.N. Chicherin, P.B. Struve. He notes that the understanding of this issue was carried out by these authors from a “Westernist” position. Liberal thinkers generally negatively assessed the religious situation, as well as state-confessional relations in imperial Russia. They proposed a number of reforms in this area and, in particular, spoke of the need to separate the church from the state.

About the Author

S. O. Elishev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

 Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor at the Faculty of Sociology

Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119234 



References

1. Chicherin B.N. Kurs gosudarstvennoj nauki. Ch. II. Sociologiya. [Course of state science. Part II. Sociology]. M., 1896 (in Russian).

2. Chicherin B.N. Kurs gosudarstvennoj nauki. Ch. III. Politika. [Course of state science. Part III. Politics]. M., 1898 (in Russian).

3. Chicherin B.N. Nauka i religiya [Science and religion]. M., 1999 (in Russian).

4. Chicherin B.N. Obshchee gosudarstvennoe parvo [General state law]. M., 2006 (in Russian).

5. Elishev S.O. Molodezhnaya politika religioznyh sekt i novoobrazovanij v rossijskoj Federacii [Youth policy of religious sects and neoplasms in the Russian Federation] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya. 2013. N 4. S. 104–118 (in Russian).

6. Elishev S.O. O sushchnosti “sovremennyh revolyucij” i gosudarstvennyh perevorotov [On the essence of “modern revolutions” and state coups]. M., 2017 (in Russian).

7. Elishev S.O. Politika. Bazovye ponyatiya [Politics. Basic concepts]. M., 2018 (in Russian).

8. Kareev N.I. Vvedenie v izuchenie sociologii [Introduction to the study of sociology]. SPb., 1897 (in Russian).

9. Kareev N.I. Obshchie osnovy sociologii [General foundations of sociology]. M., 2010 (in Russian).

10. Kovalevskij M.M. Ocherk proiskhozhdeniya i razvitiya sem’i i sobstvennosti [Essay on the origin and development of the family and property]. M., 1939 (in Russian).

11. Kovalevskij M.M. Moya zhizn’: vospominaniya [My life: memories]. M., 2005 (in Russian).

12. Milyukov P.N. Ocherki po istorii russkoj kul’tury: V 3-h t. [Essays on the history of Russian culture: In 3 vols]. M., 1993–1995 (in Russian).

13. Partiya demokraticheskih reform, mirnogo obnovleniya, progressistov. 1906–1916 gg. Dokumenty i materialy [Party of Democratic Reforms, Peaceful Renewal, Progressives. 1906–1916 Documents and materials]. M., 2002 (in Russian).

14. Russkaya mysl’ [Russian thought]. 1908. N 5 (in Russian).

15. Smirnov M.Yu. Ocherk istorii rossijskoj sociologii religii: uchebnoe posobie [Essay on the history of Russian sociology of religion: Uch. allowance]. SPb., 2008 (in Russian).

16. Solov’ev V.S. O hristianskom edinstve [On Christian Unity]. Bryussel’, 1967 (in Russian).

17. Solov’ev V.S. Sochineniya: V 2-h t. [Works: In 2 vols]. M., 1989 (in Russian).

18. Solov’ev V.S. Sochineniya: V 2 t. T. 2. [Works: In 2 vols. T. 2]. M., 1992 (in Russian).

19. Struve P.B. Patriotica: politika, kul’tura, religiya, socialism [Patriotica: politics, culture, religion, socialism]. M., 1997 (in Russian).

20. Vekhi. Sbornik statej o russkoj intelligencii [Milestones. Collection of articles about the Russian intelligentsia]. M., 1909 (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Elishev S.O. Features of sociological analysis of religion in Russia during the imperial period of its history (Continued). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2022;28(1):31-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2022-28-1-31-68

Views: 300


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)