Digital transformation of public administration: opportunities and risks
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2022-28-3-43-78
Abstract
The article discusses the priorities and socio – economic risks of the digital transformation of public administration. The main approaches to the problem of the use of advanced digital technologies in the activities of state and municipal government bodies aimed at the formation of a modern system digital environment are investigated. The main directions of the digital transition in public administration are considered, which include the digitalization of communications between public authorities, the active introduction of digital technologies into the practice of providing state and municipal services to business structures and households, stimulating the introduction of effective digital solutions as one of the important conditions for social dynamics.
The article identifies the factors and social risks affecting the digital transformation of public administration in the Russian Federation. Among them are the high level of digital inequality, deep social differentiation of regional development, the costly nature of digitalization, risks to the labor market and traditional forms and conditions of employment, problems of adaptation of citizens to the active use of digital technologies in the public administration system, as well as the unconditional provision of citizens' rights and information security in the digital environment. The importance of the course of the Russian state to dynamize the digital transformation of the state and society in the conditions of unprecedented aggravation of international relations in the modern world and tough economic and political sanctions imposed against our country was confirmed.
About the Author
Yu. A. KholodenkoRussian Federation
Kholodenko Yurii A., Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology of Public Administration, Faculty of Sociology
Leninskie Gory, 1, p. 33, Moscow, 119234
References
1. OECD (2013) Perspectives on Global Development (2013) Industrial Policies in a Changing World. URL: http://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/pgd2013.htm (accessed: 19.03.2022).
2. Cifrovaya Rossiya [Digital Russia]. URL: https://finance.skolkovo./downloads/documents/FinChair/ResearchReports/SKOLKOVO_Digital_Russia_Full_201904_ru/pdf (data obrashcheniya: 03.02.2022) (in Russian).
3. Cifrovaya transformaciya otraslej: startovye usloviya i prioritety [Digital transformation of industries: starting conditions and priorities]. M., 2021 (in Russian).
4. Davydov S.G. Cifrovye kompetencii rossiyan i rabota na samoizolyacii vo vremya pandemii COVID-19 [Digital competencies of Russians and work on self– isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic] // Social’no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2021. N 2. S. 403–422 (in Russian).
5. Dobrolyubova E.I. Ocenka cifrovoj zrelosti gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Assessment of digital maturity of public administration] // Informacionnoe obshchestvo. 2021. N 2. S. 37–52 (in Russian).
6. Gosudarstvo kak platforma. (Kiber) gosudarstvo dlya cifrovoj ekonomiki. Cifrovaya transformaciya [Th e state as a platform. (Cyber) the state for the digital economy. Digital transformation]. M., 2018 (in Russian).
7. Gusev A.V., Dobridnyuk S.L. Iskusstvennyj intellekt v medicine i zdravoohranenii [Artifi cial intelligence in medicine and healthcare] // Informacionnoe obshchestvo. 2017. N 4–5. S. 78–93 (in Russian).
8. Holodenko Yu.A. Social’nye riski cifrovoj revolyucii: faktor globalizacii [Social risks of the digital revolution: the factor of globalization] // Al’ma-Mater. Vestnik vysshej shkoly. 2019. N 9. S. 88–93 (in Russian).
9. Kosorukov A.A. Perspektivnye tekhnologicheskie resheniya v sfere postroeniya nejrocifrovogo gosudarstva [Promising technological solutions in the fi eld of building a neuro–digital state] // Sociodinamika. 2021. N 6. S. 52–66 (in Russian).
10. Kosorukov A.A., Kshemeneckaya M.N. Model’ cifrovogo upravleniya na sovremennom etape razvitiya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [The model of digital management at the present stage of public administration development] // Sociodinamika. 2019. N 1. S. 57–69 (in Russian).
11. Kupryashin G.L., Shramm A.E. O problemah informatizacii v byurokraticheskih sistemah i razvitii obshchegosudarstvennyh informacionnyh system [On the problems of informatization in bureaucratic systems and the development of national information systems] // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. 2020. N 80. S. 22–48 (in Russian).
12. Kupryashin G.L., Shramm A.E. O perspektivah tret’ej volny paradigmy cifrovogo gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [On the prospects of the third wave of the digital public administration paradigm] // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. 2021. N 84. S. 256– 276 (in Russian).
13. Martynenko T.C., Dobrinskaya D.E. Social’noe neravenstvo v epohu iskusstvennogo intellekta: ot cifrovogo k algoritmicheskomu razryvu [Social inequality in the era of artifi cial intelligence: from digital to algorithmic gap] // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 2021. N 1. S. 171–192 (in Russian).
14. Mihajlova O.V. Sovremennoe gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v usloviyah virtualizacii i rasshireniya setevogo landshaft a publichnoj politiki [Modern public administration in the context of virtualization and expansion of the network landscape of public policy] // Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 21. Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). 2019. N 4. S. 23–39 (in Russian).
15. Osipova N.G. Social’noe neravenstvo v sovremennom mire [Social inequality in the modern world] // Vestnik Mos-kovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya. 2019. T. 25. N 4. S. 124–153 (in Russian).
16. Polevanov V. Kuda idesh’, chelovek? [Where are you going, man?] // Ekonomicheskie strategii. 2017. N 1. S. 82–98 (in Russian).
17. Roboty ne prizhivayutsya na rossijskih zavodah [Robots do not take root in Russian factories] // Vedomosti. 2016.13.10. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/articles/2016/11/14/664697-roboti-ne-prizhivayutsya (data obrashcheniya: 22.02.2022) (in Russian).
18. Rossiya 2025: ot kadrov k talantam [Russia 2025: from cadres to talents] // Th e Boston Consulting Group. URL: http://d-russia.ru/wp-co11/Skills_Outline_web_tcm26-175469.pdfntent/uploads/2017/ (data obrashcheniya: 22.02.2022) (in Russian).
19. Sadovaya E.S. Mekhanizm formirovaniya neravenstva na rynke truda v cifrovuyu epohu [Th e mechanism of inequality formation in the labor market in the digital age] // Social’no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2021. N 3. S. 32–44 (in Russian).
20. Safonov A.A., Nekipelova D.V. Ocenka vliyaniya nalogovogo manevra na so-krashchenie kolichestva zanyatyh v neformal’nom sektore ekonomiki Rossii [Assessment of the impact of the tax maneuver on reducing the number of people employed in the informal sector of the Russian economy] // Social’no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2018. N 4. S. 28–41 (in Russian).
21. Sizova I.L., Husyainov T.M. Trud i zanyatost’ v cifrovoj ekonomike: problemy rossijskogo rynka truda [Labor and employment in the digital economy: problems of the Russian labor market] // Vestnik SPbGU. Sociologiya. 2017. T. 10. Vyp. 4. S. 376–396. URL: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2017.401 (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2022) (in Russian).
22. Social’nye izmeneniya v usloviyah cifrovoj sredy: kollektivnaya monografi ya [Social changes in the digital environment: a collective monograph] / Pod red. V.P. Vasil’eva. M., 2020 (in Russian).
23. Strebkov D.O., Shevchuk A.V., Spirina M.O. Samostoyatel’naya zanyatost’ na rynke udalennoj raboty: rasprostranenie innovacionnoj trudovoj praktiki [Selfemployment in the remote work market: the spread of innovative labor practice] // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 2016. N 6. S. 89–106 (in Russian).
24. Talapina L.V. Ispol’zovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta v gosudarstvennom upravlenii [The use of artificial intelligence in public administration] // Informacionnoe obshchestvo. 2021. N 3. S. 16–22 (in Russian).
25. Udalennaya rabota po-russki: plyusy i minusy [Remote work in Russian: pros and cons]. URL: wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/ (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2022) (in Russian).
26. Varlamov E. Cifrovaya ekonomika bez chelovecheskogo kapitala nesostoyatel’na [Digital economy without human capital is untenable]. URL: http:tass.ru/opinions/interviews/5100624 (data obrashcheniya: 25.02.2022) (in Russian).
27. Vasil’ev V.P. Elektronnoe pravitel’stvo v cifrovoj real’nosti [Electronic government in digital reality] // Cifrovoe obshchestvo. 2019. N 6. S. 4–11 (in Russian).
28. Vasil’ev V.P., Dekhanova N.G., Holodenko Yu.A. Faktory i tendencii social’noj diff erenciacii: novye riski [Factors and trends of social diff erentiation: new risks] // Sociodinamika. 2020. N 5. S. 43–55 (in Russian).
29. Yusifov F. Ocenka gosudarstvennyh uslug na osnove udovletvorennosti grazhdan [Assessment of public services based on the satisfaction of citizens] // Informacionnoe obshchestvo. 2020. N 4 (in Russian).
30. Zabelina O.V., Majorova A.V., Matveeva V.A. Novye formy zanyatosti i gotovnost’ rabotayushchego naseleniya Rossii k aktivnomu povedeniyu na rynke truda [New forms of employment and the readiness of the working population of Russia for active behavior in the labor market] // Social’no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2018. N 4. S. 13–27 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kholodenko Yu.A. Digital transformation of public administration: opportunities and risks. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2022;28(3):43-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2022-28-3-43-78