Ideological impact on social behavior: theoretical and methodological aspects (Continuation)
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2023-29-1-7-35
Abstract
In this article, the author attempts to analyze the key components of radical ideological constructs that directly or indirectly justify ways to solve social problems in a radical and, as a rule, illegitimate way. Among such ideologies, researchers include anarchism and socialism, which are discussed in detail in this article.
The English political philosopher W. Godwin is considered the pioneer of anarchism, and the first researcher who called himself an “anarchist” and introduced the term “anarchism” into circulation was the French socialist P.-J. Proudhon. Each country in Europe, North or South America and Asia has its own publicists, writers, public figures who defend anarchist views, anarchism has a long history in Russia, where the classics of anarchism grew up – M.A. Bakunin and P.A. Kropotkin.
The author analyzes the theoretical core of anarchism, which is formed by a number of radical political constructions – anti-statism, natural order, anti-clericalism and a free economy. At the same time, it is noted that all anarchists categorically assert that both power and private property are the cause of all human misfortunes, and, as a rule, they identify themselves with the “poor and oppressed”. They call for a revolution on behalf of the “exploited masses”, as a result of which both capitalism and the state will be wiped off the face of the earth, actively promote “ anarchy and anarchist tactics”. By anarchist tactics is meant such a merciless violent struggle that will sweep away in its path all the institutions of slavery of the old system and all their representatives and defenders in order to create a new, free system, for the spirit of destruction is at the same time a creative spirit.
The article also examines in detail the origins, essence and fundamental components of the socialist ideology, the radical varieties of which include Marxism and communism.
The author substantiates the position that, in general, the ideology of socialism is close to the ideology of communism. However, the communist ideal is more radical: the communists advocate the complete socialization of production, the complete rejection of private property (in all forms) and the centralized distribution of benefits, which takes place within the framework of a specially organized form of government – the commune. Under communism, absolute equality of people must be established, a kind of ideal society must be established, where everyone will work to the best of their abilities and receive everything they need from society. It is this aspect of communism that is the pipe dream of its supporters, leaving it a social utopia, while the ideology of socialism put forward more specific and achievable goals.
The fundamental economic, social and political reasons are analyzed, due to which the practical implementation of the ideology of socialism – the “socialist experiment” of the 20th century ended in complete failure. It is shown that it is the socialist ideology that significantly simplifies the transition to a totalitarian political system.
About the Author
N. G. OsipovaRussian Federation
Osipova Nadezda G., Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Sociology
Leninsky Gory, 1-33, Moscow, 119234
References
1. Al’manah. Sbornik po istorii anarhistskogo dvizheniya v Rossii [Almanac. Collection on the history of the anarchist movement in Russia]. T. 1. URL: http://karaultheca.ru/rus-an/almanach.htm#30 (data obrashcheniya: 09.01.2023) (in Russian).
2. Altunina O.V. Ob’’ektivnye predposylki zarozhdeniya sociologii v An-glii [Objective prerequisites for the emergence of sociology in England]. M., 2001 (in Russian).
3. Arendt X. Istoki totalitarizma [The origins of totalitarianism]. M., 1996 (in Russian).
4. Aron R. Demokratiya i totalitarizm [Democracy and totalitarianism]. M., 1993 (in Russian).
5. Bakunin M.A. Gosudarstvennost’ i anarhiya [Statehood and anarchy]. SPb., 1873 (in Russian).
6. Bakunin M.A. Principy i organizaciya internacional’nogo revolyucionnogo obshchestva i revolyucionnyj katekhizis [Principles and organization of an international revolutionary society and a revolutionary catechism]. URL: http://ak-protest.narod.ru/revolytkatexiz.htm (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2023) (in Russian).
7. Bakunin M.A. Revolyucionnyj katekhizis [Revolutionary catechism]. M., 2013 (in Russian).
8. Buchenkov D.E. Anarhizm v Rossii v konce HKH veka [Anarchism in Russia at the end of the 20th century]. M., 2009 (in Russian).
9. Engel’s F. Pis’mo Francu Meringu v Berlin [Letter to Franz Mehring in Berlin] // Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. T. 39 (in Russian).
10. Fedotov G.P. Social’nyj vopros i svoboda [Social issue and freedom] // Sovremennye zapiski. 1931. N 47 (in Russian).
11. Fedotova V.G. Anarhiya i poryadok v kontekste rossijskogo postkommuni-sticheskogo razvitiya [Anarchy and order in the context of Russian post-communist development] // Voprosy filosofii. 1998. N 5 (in Russian).
12. Godvin U. O sobstvennosti [About property] / Vstup. Stat’ya V.P. Volgina M., 1958 (in Russian).
13. Heywood A. Political Ideologies. An Introduction. L., 1992.
14. Kampanella. Gorod Solnca [City of Sun]. M.-L., 1954 (in Russian).
15. Karpov B.S., Orlov A.A. Evolyuciya mirovozzreniya Uil’yama Godvina: vliyanie rannih cennostnyh ustanovok na vyrabotku obshchestvenno-politicheskoj koncepcii [The evolution of William Godwin’s worldview: the influence of early values on the development of a socio-political concept] // LOKUS: lyudi, obshchestvo, kul'turnye smysly. 2021. T. 12. N 1 (in Russian).
16. Korolenko V. Pis’ma k Lunacharskomu [Letters to Lunacharsky] // Sajt Virtual’nogo muzeya V.G. Korolenko. URL: http://vmkor.ru/index.php?id=155 (in Russian)
17. Kropotkin P.A. Hleb i volya. Sovremennaya nauka i anarhiya [Bread and freedom. Modern science and anarchy]. M., 1990 (in Russian).
18. Kropotkin P.A. Rechi buntovshchika [Rebel’s Speeches] / Vstup. st. D.I. Rublyova. M., 2009 (in Russian).
19. Mamut L.S. Etatizm i anarhizm kak tipy politicheskogo soznaniya [Etatism and anarchism as types of political consciousness]. M., 1989 (in Russian).
20. Marks K. K kritike politicheskoj ekonomii. Predislovie [Toward a critique of political economy. Foreword] // Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. T. 13 (in Russian).
21. Marks K. Kritika Gotskoj programmy [Criticism of the Gotha Program] // Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. T. 19 (in Russian).
22. Marks K., Engel’s F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoj partii [Manifesto of the Communist Party] // Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. T. 4 (in Russian).
23. Mirskij G.I. Ushel li totalitarizm vmeste s dvadcatym vekom [Did totalitarianism leave with the twentieth century] // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2002. N 1 (in Russian).
24. Mor T. Zolotaya kniga, stol’ zhe poleznaya, kak zabavnaya o nailuchshem ustrojstve gosudarstva i o novom ostrove Utopii [A golden book, as useful as it is funny about the best state and about the new island of Utopia]. M., 1905 (in Russian).
25. Novikova L.I., Sizemskaya I.N. Anarhizm [Anarchism] // Novaya filosofskaya enciklopediya: V 4 t. M., 2000. T. 1 (in Russian).
26. Osipova N.G. Sociologicheskie vozzreniya Karla Marksa i Fridriha En-gel’sa [Sociological views of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels] // Istoriya sociologii: Uch. / Otv. red. G.V. Osipov, V.G. Kultygin. M., 2009 (in Russian).
27. Ouen R. Doklad grafstvu Lanark [Report to County Lanark] // Ouen R. Izbr. soch. M.; L., 1950. T. 1 (in Russian).
28. Ouen R. Doklad, predstavlennyj komitetu Associacii dlya oblegcheniya polozheniya promyshlennyh i sel’skohozyajstvennyh rabochih [Report presented to the Association committee to alleviate the situation of industrial and agricultural workers] // Ouen R. Izbr. Soch. M.-L., 1950. T. 1 (in Russian).
29. Prudon P.-Zh. Chto takoe sobstvennost’ ili issledovanie o principe prava i vlasti [What is property or research on the principle of law and power]. M., 2019 (in Russian).
30. Rublev D.I. Petr Kropotkin i ego pervaya kniga [Peter Kropotkin and his first book] // Kropotkin P.A. Rechi buntovshchika / Vstup. st. D.I. Rublyova. M., 2009 (in Russian).
31. Sokolov N.V. Otshchepency [Renegades]. Cyurih, 1872 (in Russian).
32. Totalitarizm [Totalitarianism] // Bol’shoj enciklopedicheskij slovar’. M.; SPb., 1997 (in Russian).
33. Vladimir Korolenko… [Vladimir Korolenko…] // Miloserdie.ru. URL: https://www.miloserdie.ru/article/vladimir-korolenko-czelyj-den-u-menya-tolcheya-plachut-prosyat-posrednichestva-po-povodu-arestov-i-ugroz-rasstrelami/ (data obrashcheniya: 09.01.2023) (in Russian).
34. Ward S. Anarchism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, 2004.
35. Za anarhiyu [For anarchy] // Al’manah. Sbornik po istorii anarhistskogo dvizheniya v Rossii. T. 1. URL: http://karaultheca.ru/rus-an/almanach.htm#30 (data obrashcheniya: 9.01.2023) (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Osipova N.G. Ideological impact on social behavior: theoretical and methodological aspects (Continuation). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2023;29(1):7-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2023-29-1-7-35