Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Sociological dominant in research projects in the theory and practice of public administration

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2016-22-1-123-138

Abstract

The article provides an overview of the theoretical relationships of public administration with the scientific bases of social disciplines. The author defines the relationship between the theory of public administration with the methodological principles and structure of general sociology, and a range of sectoral sociological theories. The principles of the study of public administration are represented in the structure of interactions with the basic elements of macrosociology, empirical sociological studies, and interdisciplinary areas of knowledge. Special attention is paid to the causes and consequences of underestimating of the relationship between sociology and economics. The author approves the need for their synthesis in the development of theoretical models and practical recommendations to the authorities. Concerning the large scale of financial resources from public budgets and the simultaneous crisis of the welfare state in modern Russia, the task to solve the problem of “government failures” becomes really urgent. The multifactor model of the sociological measurement of public administration’s quality is presented as a result of author’s analysis. The basic directions of sociological research of public administration and social policy are proved and connected with the administrative reforms and elaboration of development strategy for Russian society.

About the Author

V. P. Vasiliev
Moscow State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Барков С.А. Организация и рынок: противоборство или согласие? М., 2008.

2. Бауман З. Глобализация. Последствия для человека и общества. М., 2004.

3. Валлерстайн И. Конец знакомого мира: социология XXI века. М., 2003.

4. Васильев В.П., Деханова Н.Г., Лось Н.А., Холоденко Ю.А. Государственное и муниципальное управление. М., 2014.

5. Гидденс Э. Ускользающий мир: как глобализация меняет нашу жизнь. М., 2004.

6. Нуреев Р.М. Теория общественного выбора. М., 2005.

7. Осипова Н.Г. Отраслевая матрица современной социологии: кризис дивергенции // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 18. Социология и политология. 2013. № 2. С. 29-51.

8. Политическая социология / Под. ред. Ж.Т. Тощенко. М., 2012.

9. Попов Е.А. Современная социология в перекрестье междисциплинарности // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 8. С. 23-29.

10. Радаев В.В. Экономическая социология. М., 2008.

11. Радыгин А., Энтов Р. “Провалы государства”: теория и политика // Вопросы экономики. 2012. № 12. С. 4-31.

12. Россия и страны мира. М., 2014.

13. Сорокин П.А. Система социологии. М., 2008.

14. Социология. Основы общей теории: Уч. / Под ред. Г.В. Осипова, Л.Н. Москвичева. М., 2008.

15. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. Governance matters VI: aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996-2006 // World Bank Policy. Research Working Paper. 2007. July. Vol. 4280.

16. Merton R. Social theory and social structure. N.Y., 1949.

17. Marshall A. Principles of economics. L., 1890.


Review

For citations:


Vasiliev V.P. Sociological dominant in research projects in the theory and practice of public administration. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2016;22(1):123-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2016-22-1-123-138

Views: 1117


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)