Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

TRANSFORMATION OF THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN A MODERN SOCIETY: AT FAMILY AND AT WORKPLACE

Abstract

According to the UN report, the question of the position and role of women in society is second the most important after the ecological and economic global problems. We observe that the process of development of civil society entails the inevitable changing roles of men and women in today’s world, women are increasingly involved in decision-making, there is full protection of gender equality, it includes the ethnic and socio-cultural aspects. Now the unshakable form of the family in which the man was the breadwinner, changes its shape. Woman seeks to equality in the family, to harmonious distribution of responsibilities between the spouses. She has become more independent, she has a desire to realize herself not only in the home but also outside it, in the professional field. Now the woman occupies the positions, which previously only men could have. And even there is the “glass ceiling” women are increasingly consolidates its positions on the top posts. She is making her way to the top because of her communication skills. Men are different from women’s by aggressive, task-oriented type of behavior that does not fit the new management model, which is becoming more and more popular nowadays. However, women owning more appropriate communication skills, can’t take root in the management environment, because they encounter with the requirements established by the men and the need of directly communicate with the opposite sex, to establish economic partnerships, and to adopt this model of communication. And getting into the man’s environment, the women are included into the competition for status and power, thus losing their unique way of communication, which is even prescribed them by gender stereotypes. This confusion of roles has been called “double bind”, when you can’t match to the same type of conduct in connection with the surrounding social conditions, and forced to maneuver between different models of behavior. Woman seeks to catch up with men not only in the field of employment, but also in the family, we also observe this process. Model family with two working parents looks more attractive and appropriate to modern realities for modern society. The traditional model of the family, where the father – breadwinner and the mother – a housewife, changes by another model of the family, where there is partnership and equality. Woman of the XXI century knows that for her happiness, it is necessary to combine the main areas of her life, namely, family and work. At the same time she have to combine them harmoniously because different roles must not overlap with each other, and the woman could realize herself fully in all spheres of life.

About the Authors

O. V. Kabaikina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

post-graduate student of Contemporary sociology department, Faculty of sociology



O. A. Sushchenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

post-graduate student of Family sociology and demography department, Faculty of sociology



References

1. Ajvazova S.G. Kontrakt rabotajushhej materi: narushenija ili rastorzhenie? (K voprosu ob osobennostjah gendernoj politiki v sovremennoj Rossii) [A contract for a working mother: violation or termination? (On the issue of gender policy in modern Russia)] // Zhenshhina v rossijskom obshhestve [Woman in Russian society]. 2011. N 3. S. 11–12.

2. Aksjonova A.S. Vybor zhenshhiny: kar’era ili sem’ja? [The choice of a woman: career or family?] // Kul’tura i obrazovanie [Culture and education]. 2015. Fevr. N 2. URL: http://vestnik-rzi.ru/2015/02/3253 (data obrashhenija: 24.07.2016).

3. Barret M., Davidson M.J. Gender and communication at work. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. 2006.

4. Blossfeld H.-P., Drobnic S. Careers of couples in contemporary society: from male breadwinner to dual-earner families. Oxford, 2001.

5. Crompton R. Employment, flexible working and the family // The British journal of sociology. 2002. N 3.

6. Dadaeva T.M. Kto vynosit musor, ili Paradoksy gendernogo razdelenija truda [Who takes out the garbage, or Paradoxes of the gender division of labor] // Sociologicheskie issledovanija [Sociological research]. 2005. N 6. S. 37–48.

7. Gimranova L.A. Zhenshhina kak rukovoditel’: nekotorye aspekty gendernoj statistiki [Woman as leader: some aspects of gender statistics] // Kazanskaja nauka [Kazan Science]. 2012. N 11. S. 75–79.

8. Global’nye voprosy povestki dnja OON [Global issues on the UN agenda]. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/globalissues/women/

9. Grant Thornton: Rossija – mirovoj lider po doli zhenshhin-menedzherov [Grant Thornton: Russia is the world leader in the share of women managers]. URL: http://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/articles/women-in-business-2016.

10. Hartmann H. Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex // The Signs Reader: Women, Gender and Scholarship / Ed. by E. Abel, E.K. Abel. Chicago, 1983.

11. Inglehart R., Norris P. Rising tide: gender equality and cultural change around the world. N.Y., 2003.

12. Lysenko L.M., Krjakina E. O roli zhenshhiny v sovremennom obshhestve [About the role of women in modern society] // The theory and practice of gender studies in world science: materials of the VI international scientific conference on May 5–6, 2015. Prague, 2015. URL: http://sociosphera.com/files/conference/2015/k-05_05_15.pdf

13. Malkova M.A. Tipologicheskij analiz domashnego truda [Typological analysis of domestic work] // Mir Rossii [World of Russia]. 2011. N 1. S.147–166.

14. Mezhregional’naja obshhestvennaja organizacija “Federacija zhenshhin s universitetskim obrazovaniem” [Interregional Public Organization “Federation of Women with University Education”]. URL: http://fuwr.ru/

15. Model’nyj zakon o gosudarstvennyh garantijah ravnyh prav i ravnyh vozmozhnostej dlja muzhchin i zhenshhin (Prinjat v g. Sankt-Peterburge 18.11.2005

16. Postanovleniem 26-11 na 26-om plenarnom zasedanii Mezhparlamentskoj Assamblei gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNG) [Model Law on State Guarantees of Equal Rights and Equal Opportunities for Men and Women (Adopted in St. Petersburg on November 18, 2005 by Resolution 26-11 at the 26th plenary meeting of the Interparliamentary Assembly of CIS Member States)].

17. Naemnyj rabotnik v sovremennoj Rossii [Employee in modern Russia] /Otv. red. Z.T. Golenkova [Ed. by Z.T. Golenkova]. M., 2015.

18. Oppenheimer V.K. Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and development review, 1994.

19. Rol’ zhenshhin v jekonomike razvivajushhihsja stran nedoocenen, govoryat analitiki [The role of women in the economy of developing countries is underestimated – analysts]. URL: http://www.interfax.by/news/belarus/1150335

20. Sinel’nikov A.B. Transformacija semejnyh otnoshenij i ee znachenie dlja demograficheskoj politiki v Rossii [Transformation of family relations and its importance for demographic policy in Russia] // Demograficheskie issledovanija [Demographic studies]. 2006. N 5. URL: http://www.demographia.ru/articles_N/index.html?idR=5&idArt=683

21. Social’no-demograficheskij portret Rossii. Po itogam Vserossijskoj perepisi naselenija 2010 [Social and demographic portrait of Russia. Based on the results of the All-Russia population census 2010]. M., 2012.

22. St. 19 konstitucii RF FZ N 284965-3 “O gosudarstvennyh garantijah ravnyh prav i svobod i ravnyh vozmozhnostej muzhchin i zhenshhin v Rossijskoj Federacii” (red., vnesennaja v GD FS RF, tekst po sostojaniju na 17.01.2003) [Art. 19 of the RF Constitution, Federal Law N 284965-3 “On State Guarantees of Equal Rights and Freedoms and Equal Opportunities for Men and Women in the Russian Federation” (as amended by the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, text as of 17.01.2003)].

23. Tashheva A.I. Svoeobrazie supruzheskih otnoshenij v “dvuhkar’ernyh” i “ne kar’ernyh” brakah [The peculiarity of conjugal relations in “two-career” and “non-career” marriages] // Vestnik Adygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Pedagogika i psihologija [Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series of Pedagogy and Psychology]. 2012. Vyp. 4. S. 149–155.

24. The Global Gender Gap Report 2013. World Economic Forum. The Global Gender Gap Harvard University and the University of California. Berkeley, www.weforum.org/ (accessed: 02.06.2016).

25. Tilly L.A., Scott J.W. Women, work, and family. N.Y., 1987.

26. Trud i zanjatost’ v Rossii [Labor and employment in Russia]. M., 2013.

27. Trudovoj kodeks RF: Federal’nyj zakon ot 30 dekabrja 2001 g. N 197-FZ (v red. Federal’nogo zakona ot 3 ijulja 2016 g.) [The Labor Code of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of December 30, 2001 No. 197-FZ (in the edition of the Federal Law of July 3, 2016)] // Rossijskaja gazeta. 2001. 31 dek.

28. Zaretsky E. Capitalism, the family, and personal life. N.Y.,1986.


Review

For citations:


Kabaikina O.V., Sushchenko O.A. TRANSFORMATION OF THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN A MODERN SOCIETY: AT FAMILY AND AT WORKPLACE. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2017;23(3):140-155. (In Russ.)

Views: 47960


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)