Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

INTELLECTUAL ORIGINS OF DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS IN POLITICAL STUDIES

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-71-97

Abstract

The article studies the intellectual origins of a discursive approach in political science. Attention is drawn not to the process of discoursive approach formation (which was formed in the 1960s–1970s under the influence of the “linguistic turn”), but to the many themes of thought that developed and had a decisive influence on the solution of the problem of language non-neutrality in the perception and reproduction of political relations. In many respects, the reliance on different traditions predetermined the inconsistency of the notion of discourse. We are interested not so much in direct referrals (this would lead to the compilation of a very voluminous list that allow little to understand), but rather specific intellectual borrowings in the form of identifying a problem field, marking out, distinguishing and denoting the research space. What does it mean to study language as a non-neutral dimension of comprehension and re-actualization of political processes? Analytical philosophy would draw attention to the logical structures of the language, German linguistic philosophy – to the “world view”, provided by the basic structure of everyday language. Formalists would make a research in text narratives, while structuralism insists on basic structures and provides “langue/parole” model. Semiotics is a general science about symbols, which provides specific meta-language, whereas “phenomenological tradition” is based on the idea that a language plays constitutive role in the process of the intersubjective interactions and creation of social relations.

About the Author

K. A. Pakhalyuk
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Russian Federation

Postgraduate student, Department of Political Theory

Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Alker H. Rediscoveries and reformulations. Humanistic methodologies for international studies. Cambridge, 1996.

2. Alpatov V.M. Sossjur i mirovaja nauka – Ferdinand de Sossjur i sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie. Sb. st. [Saussure and world science – Ferdinand de Saussure and modern humanitarian knowledge: Sat. Art] / Otv. red. V.G. Kuznecov. M., 2007. S. 12–27 (in Russian).

3. Avtonomova N. Otkrytaja struktura: Jakobson – Bahtin – Lotman – Gasparov [Open structure: Yakobson – Bakhtin – Lotman – Gasparov]. M., 2009 (in Russian).

4. Bart R. Mifologii [Mythology]. M., 2014 (in Russian).

5. Berk P. Chto takoe kul’tural’naja istorija? [What is the cultural history?]. M., 2015 (in Russian).

6. Bernackaja A.A. Jekolingvistika i “kritikajazyka” [Ecolinguistics and “criticism of the language”] // Jekologijajazyka i kommunikativnaja praktika. 2014. N 2. S. 15–31 (in Russian).

7. Birjukov N.I., Sergeev V.M. Stanovlenie institutov predstavitel’noj vlasti v sovremennoj Rossii [Formation of institutions of representative power in modern Russia]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

8. Bljaher L.E. Nestabil’nye social’nye sostojanija [Unstable social conditions]. M., 2005 (in Russian).

9. Bondarev A.P. Ferdinand de Sossjur i nekotorye voprosy teorii literatury [Ferdinand de Saussure and some questions of the theory of literature] // Ferdinand de Sossjur i sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie. Sb. st. / Otv. red. V.G. Kuznecov. M., 2007. S. 116–135 (in Russian).

10. Bugajskij M. Jazyk kommunikacii [The language of communication]. Har’kov, 2010 (in Russian).

11. Burcev V.A. Diskursivnaja formacija kak edinica analiza diskursa [Discursive formation as a unit of discourse analysis] // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Serija: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2008. N. 10. S. 9–16 (in Russian).

12. Chudinov A.P. Politicheskaja lingvistika. Uchbnoe posobie [Political Linguistics: Uch. Help.]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

13. Dejk T. Diskurs i vlast’. Reprezentacija dominirovanija v jazyke i kommunikacii [Discourse and Power. Representation of dominance in language and communication]. M., 2013 (in Russian).

14. Dijk T. Discourse studies and hermeneutics // Discourse Studies. 2011. Vol. 13. N 5. P. 609–621.

15. Dzhejmison F. Marksizm I interpretacija kul’tury [Marxism and the interpretation of culture]. M.; Ekaterinburg, 2014 (in Russian).

16. Fairclough N. Language and neo-liberalism // Discourse and society. 2000. Vol. 11 (2). Fairclough N. Language and power. Edinburgh, 1996. Fuko M. Arheologija znanija [Archeology of knowledge]. Kiev, 1996 (in Russian).

17. Gijomu Zh., Mal’did’e D. O novyh priemah interpretacii, ili problema smysla s tochki zrenija analiza diskursa [On new methods of interpretation, or the problem of meaning from the point of view of analyzing discourse] // Kvadratura smysla. Francuzskaja shkola analiza diskursa. M., 1999. S. 124–136 (in Russian).

18. Grejmas A. Razmyshlenija ob aktantnyh modeljah [Reflections on Actant Models] // Francuzskaja semiotika. Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu. M., 2000. S. 152–170 (in Russian).

19. Hacking I. Why does language matter to philosophy? Cambridge, 1988.

20. Harris Z. Discourse analysis // Language. 1952. Vol. 28. N 1. P. 1–30.

21. Il’in M.V. Perspektivy politicheskogo diskurs-analiza v Rossii [Perspectives of political discourse analysis in Russia] // Diskurs-Pi. 2006. N 1. S. 93–96 (in Russian).

22. Il’in M.V., Fomin I.V. I smysl, i vera. Semiotika v prostranstve sovremennoj nauki [And the meaning, and faith. Semiotics in the Space of Modern Science] // Politicheskaja nauka. 2016. N 3. S. 30–46 (in Russian).

23. Jang Dzh. Totalitarnyj jazyk [Totalitarian Language] // Sociolingvistika I sociologija jazyka. Hrestomatija. T. 2. / Otv. red. N.B. Vahtin. SPb., 2015. S. 659–715 (in Russian).

24. Jenaff M. Klod Levi-Stross i strukturnaja antropologija [Claude Levi-Strauss and structural anthropology]. M., 2010 (in Russian).

25. Jurchak A. “Jeto bylo navsegda poka ne konchilos’”. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [“It was forever not over yet”. The last Soviet generation]. M., 2016 (in Russian).

26. Kjemeron D. Razgovornyj diskurs [Spoken discourse]. Har’kov, 2015 (in Russian).

27. Kolomiec S.V., Kameneva V.A. Diskurs pressy I reklamy kak diskurs vlasti (gendernyj aspekt) [Discourse of the press and advertising as a discourse of power (gender aspect)]. Kemerovo, 2012 (in Russian).

28. Kogler H. The power of dialog. Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault. Cambridge; Massachusetts; L., 1999.

29. Korbut A.M. Govorite po ocheredi: netehnicheskoe vvedenie v konversacionny janaliz [Speak one by one: non-technical introduction to the conversion analysis] // Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. 2015. T. 14. N 1. S. 120–141 (in Russian).

30. Kornilov O.A. Jazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye nacional’nyh mentalitetov [Language pictures of the world as derivatives of national mentality]. M., 2014 (in Russian).

31. Kosikov G.K. Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu: problem metodologii [From structuralism to poststructuralism: the problems of methodology]. M., 1998 (in Russian).

32. Kuznecov V.G. Parizhskaja i Zhenevskaja vetvi uchenikov i posledovatelej F. de Sossjura [The Paris and Geneva branches of students and followers of F. de Saussure] // Ferdinand de Sossjur I sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie. Sb. st. / Otv. red. V.G. Kuznecov. M., 2007. S. 28–65 (in Russian).

33. Labov W., Waletzky J. Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience // Sociolinguistics. The Essential Reading / Ed. by Ch. Paulston, G. Tucker. Oxford, 2006. P. 74–104.

34. Larionova M.V. Ispanskij gazetno-publicisticheskij diskurs: iskusstvo informacii ili masterstvo manipuljacii? [Spanish newspaper and journalistic discourse: the art of information or the skill of manipulation?]. M., 2015 (in Russian).

35. Levchenko Ja. Drugaja nauka. Russkie formalisty v poiskah biografii [Another science. Russian formalists in search of a biography]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

36. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaja antropologija [Structural anthropology]. M., 2001 (in Russian). Makarov M.L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of discourse theory]. M., 2006 (in Russian).

37. Makeeva L.Ju. Jazyk, ontologija I realism [Language, ontology and realism]. M., 2011 (in Russian).

38. Malinova O.Ju. Simvolicheskaja politika: kontury problemnogo polja [Symbolic politics: contours of the problem field] // Simvolicheskaja politika: Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenij o proshlom kak vlastnyj resurs / Otv. red. O.Ju. Malinova. M., 2012. S. 5–16 (in Russian).

39. Marchart O. Post-foundational political thought. Edinburgh, 2007.

40. Marchenko T.V. Manipuljativnyj potencial intertekstual’nyh vkljuchenij v politicheskom diskurse [Manipulative potential of intertextual inclusions in political discourse]. Stavropol’, 2014 (in Russian).

41. Maslova V.A. Politicheskij diskurs: jazykovye igry ili igry v slova? [Political discourse: language games or word games?] // Politicheskaja lingvistika. 2008. N 24. S. 43–47 (in Russian).

42. Mihaleva O.L. Politicheskij diskurs. Specifika manipuljativnogo vozdejstvija [Political discourse. Specificity of manipulative influence]. M., 2009 (in Russian).

43. Morozov V.E. Rossija I Drugie: identichnost’ i granicy politicheskogo soobshhestva [Russia and Others: the identity and boundaries of political co-society]. M., 2009 (in Russian).

44. Musihin G.I. “Blesk i nishheta” politicheskih ritualov [“Shine and poverty” of political rituals] // Politija. 2015. N 2. S. 98–109 (in Russian).

45. Nojmann I. Ispol’zovanie “drugogo”. Obrazy Vostoka v formirovanii evropejskih identichnostej [The use of “another”. Images of the East in the formation of European identities]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

46. Parshina O.N. Rossijskaja politicheskaja rech’ [Russian political speech]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

47. Pecherskaja N.V. Znat’ ili nazyvat’: metafora kak kognitivnyj resurs social’nogo znanija [To know or call: metaphor as a cognitive resource of social knowledge] // Polis. 2004. N 2. S. 93–105 (in Russian).

48. Poceluev S.P. “Simvolicheskaja politika”: k istorii koncepta [“Symbolic politics”: to the history of the concept] // Simvolicheskaja politika: Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenij o proshlom kak vlastnyj resurs / Otv. red. O.Ju. Malinova. M., 2012. S. 17–53 (in Russian).

49. Poseljagin N. Antropologicheskij povorot v rossijskih gumanitarnyh naukah [Anthropological Turn in the Russian Humanities] // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2012. N 1. S. 27–36 (in Russian).

50. Potapova N.D. Lingvisticheskij povorot v istoriografii [Linguistic turn in historiography]. SPb., 2015 (in Russian).

51. Propp V.Ja. Morfologija “volshebnoj” skazki. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoj skazki [Morphology of the “fairy tale”. Historical roots of a fairy tale]. M., 1998 (in Russian).

52. Roben R. Analiz diskursa na styke lingvistiki i gumanitarnyh nauk: vechnoe nedorazumenie [Analysis of discourse at the junction of linguistics and the humanities: an eternal misunderstanding] // Kvadratura smysla. Francuzskaja shkola analiza diskursa. M., 1999. S. 184–196 (in Russian).

53. Russkaja intellektual’naja revoljucija 1910–1930-h gg. [Russian intellectual revolution of 1910–1930-s.]. M., 2016 (in Russian).

54. Sergeev V.M. Narodovlastie na sluzhbe jelit [Democracy in the service of elites]. M., 2013 (in Russian).

55. Serio P. Kak chitajut teksty vo Francii? [How are the texts read in France?] // Kvadratura smysla. Francuzskaja shkola analiza diskursa. M., 1999. S. 12–53 (in Russian).

56. Serio P. Ot prozrachnosti k neprozrachnosti v sovetskom politicheskom diskurse [From Transparency to Opacity in Soviet Political Discourse] // Sociolingvistika i sociologija jazyka. Hrestomatija. T. 2. / Otv. red. N.B. Vahtin. SPb., 2015. S. 609–636 (in Russian).

57. Shapiro I. Begstvo ot real’nosti v gumanitarnyh naukah [Flight from reality in the humanities]. M., 2011 (in Russian).

58. Shejgal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [The semiotics of political discourse]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

59. Silichev D.A. F. de Sossjur i sovremennaja filosofija [F. de Saussure and modern philosophy] // Ferdinand de Sossjur i sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie. Sb. st. / Otv. red. V.G. Kuznecov. M., 2007. S. 84–115 (in Russian).

60. Skinner Q. Visions of politics. Vol 1. Regarding method. Cambridge, 2002. Soboleva M.E. Filosofija kak “kritika jazyka” v Germanii [Philosophy as a “criticism of the language” in Germany]. SPb., 2005 (in Russian).

61. Tom F. Opisanie novojaza [Description of the newsletter] // Sociolingvistika I sociologija jazyka. Hrestomatija. T. 2. / Otv. red. N.B. Vahtin. SPb., 2015. S. 637–658 (in Russian).

62. Ujest D. Kontinental’naja filosofija. Vvedenie [Continental Philosophy. Introduction]. M., 2015 (in Russian).

63. Vahshtajn V.S. Kur’ezy i paradoksy fenomenologicheskoj intervencii [Curiosities and paradoxes of phenomenological intervention] // Sociologija vlasti. 2014. N 1. S. 5–9 (in Russian).

64. Vdovichenko A.V. Rasstavanie s “jazykom”: kriticheskaja retrospektiva lingvisticheskogo znanija [Parting with the “language”: a critical retrospective of linguistic knowledge]. M., 2008 (in Russian).

65. Ven P. Fuko. Ego mysl’ i lichnost’ [Foucault. His thought and personality]. SPb., 2013 (in Russian).

66. Zenkin S.N. Raboty o teorii [Work on the theory]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

67. Zenkin S. Rolan Bart – teoretik i praktik mifologii [Roland Bart – theorist and practitioner of mythology] // Bart R. Mifologii. M., 2014. S. 23–29 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Pakhalyuk K.A. INTELLECTUAL ORIGINS OF DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS IN POLITICAL STUDIES. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2018;24(1):71-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-71-97

Views: 1710


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)