POLITICAL FACTORS OF NSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION OF RUSSIAN PUBLIC SERVICE
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-210-232
Abstract
We define the civil service as a political and administrative institution established to meet the needs in the professional performance of political decisions and providing the daily contact between the society and the political power. The definition of civil service in the Russian legislation is not fit the features of public institution, that is why the institutionalization of the civil service in post-Soviet Russia face difficulties.
We see ways to overcome this contradiction, which include the improvement of legislation and implementation to the strategic documents the goals, objectives and performance criteria of civil service institution-building. This goals and objectives should orientate the civil servants to ensure economic growth and improving the quality of citizen’s life.
The architecture of the civil service institution was offered, including the legal, institutional and human components. We identified the institutional characteristics and location of this institution in the environment of society.
The algorithm of civil service institutional change was clarified, which includes elements such as institutional selection, the definition of institutional norms and institutional effects.
The requirements for the assessment of institutional effectiveness were formulated. We proved the necessity to describe the driving forces of civil service development not only by external influences, but also its internal environment.
The comparison of this set of statistics with indicators of internal development of the civil service allows concluding about the correlation between the civil service performance on different stages of its institutional transformation and attainment the priorities of the economy and society.
About the Author
G. A. BorshevskiyRussian Federation
Ph.D. (History), Associate Professor, Department of Civil Service and Personnel Policy
Vernadskogo Av., 82, Moscow, 119571
References
1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. The rise and decline of general laws of capitalism // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2015. Vol. 29. N 4. P. 123–135.
2. Afanas’yev M.N. Gosudarev dvor ili grazhdanskaya sluzhba? (Rossiyskoye chinovnichestvo na rasput’ye) [Sovereign courtyard or the civil service? (Russian bureaucracy at the crossroads)] // Political studies. 1995. N 6. P. 67–72 (in Russian).
3. Barabashev A.G. Krizis gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i ego vliyanie na osnovnye administrativnye paradigm gosudarstva i byurokratii [The crisis of governance and its impact on the basic paradigm of the public administration and bureaucracy] // Public Administration Issues. 2016. N 3. P. 163–194 (in Russian).
4. Coase R. The institutional structure of production // The American Economic Review. 1992. Vol. 82. N 4. P. 713–719.
5. Crozier M. The bureaucratic phenomenon. New Brunswick; L., 2010. Drechsler W. The rise and demise of the new public management // Postautistic Economics Review. 2005. Is. 33. P. 17–28.
6. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Mirovoj opyt reformirovaniya system gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [International experience of reforming the public administration system] // Bulletin of MGIMO. 2013. N 4. P. 187–194 (in Russian).
7. Gelman V.Y. Modernizaciya, institutyi “porochnyj krug” postsovetskogo neopatrimonializma [Modernization, institutions and “vicious circle” of postSoviet neopatrimonialism]. SPb., 2015 (in Russian).
8. Huntington S. Political order in changing societies. N.Y., 2004. Komarowskiy V.S. Administrativnaya reforma: ozhidaniya I trebovaniya grazhdan k gosudarstvennoj sluzhbe [Administrative reform: the expectations and demands of citizens to public office] // Public service. 2007. N 4. P. 4–8 (in Russian).
9. Kupryashin G.L. Modernizaciya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: instituty i interesy [The modernization of public administration: the institutions and interests]. M., 2012 (in Russian).
10. Kuz’minov Ya.I., Radaev V.V., Yakovlev A.A., Yasin E.G. Instituty: otzaimstvovaniya k vyrashchivaniyu (opyt rossijskih reform I vozmozhnost’ kul’tivirovaniya institucional’nyh izmenenij) [The institutions from borrowing to grow (the experience of Russian reforms and the possibility of changes in the institutional culture)] // Economic Issues. 2005. N 5. P. 5–27 (in Russian).
11. Ledeneva A. Can Russia modernize? Sistema, power networks, and informal governance. Cambridge, 2013.
12. Leskova I.V. Stanovlenie instituta gosudarstvennoj sluzhby v usloviyah politicheskoj modernizacii sovremennoj Rossii [Formation of institute of public service in the conditions of political modernization of modern Russia]: Dis. … Candidate of polit. sciences. Orel, 2004 (in Russian).
13. Levada Yu.A. Otmneniy k ponimaniyu. Sotsiologicheskiyeocherki 1993–2000 [From opinions to understanding. Sociological Essays 1993–2000]. M., 2000 (in Russian).
14. Lynn L.Jr. What is a neo-Weberian state? Reflections on a concept and its implications // NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. 2008. Vol. I. N 2. P. 17–37.
15. Magomedov K.O. Sotsiologicheskiy monitoring kadrovoy korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennogo I munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Sociological monitoring of personnel corruption in the state and municipal management system] // Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and social change. 2016. N 2. P. 213–215 (in Russian).
16. North D.S. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, 1996.
17. Olsen J.P. Governing through institution building: institutional theory and recent European experiments in democratic organization. Oxford, 2010.
18. Parsons T. The structure of social action. M., 2000 (in Russian).
19. Patrushev S.V. Institucional’naya politologiya: Sovremennyj institucionalizm I politicheskaya transformaciya Rossii [Institutional Political Science: Modern institutionalism and political transformation of Russia]. M., 2006 (in Russian).
20. Pejovich S. The market for institutions vs the strong hard of the state. The case of Eastern Europe // Economic institutions, markets and competition / Ed. by B. Dallago, L. Mittone. Cheltenham, 1996.
21. Plaksin S., Zhulin A. Puti modernizatsii gosudarstvennogo apparata: administrativnaya reforma I reforma gosudarstvennoy grazhdanskoy sluzhby [Ways of modernization of the state apparatus: Administrative Reform and Civil Service Reform] // Issues of Economy. 2008. N 2. P. 15–25 (in Russian).
22. Polterovich V.M. Institucional’nye lovushki: est’ li vyhod [Institutional traps: is there a way] // Social studies and the present. 2004. N 3. P. 5–16 (in Russian).
23. Polterovich V.M. Proektirovanie reform: kak iskat’ promezhutochnye instituty [Planning reform: how to look for intermediate institutes] // Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2012. Vol. 8. N 2. P. 25–44 (in Russian).
24. Rethinking political institutions // The Art of the State / Ed. by I. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, D. Galvin. N.Y., 2006.
25. Shabrov O.F. Reforma gosudarstvennoj sluzhby: otkrytost’ ili ehffektivnost’ [Civil service reform: transparency and efficiency] // Sociology of Power. 2005. N 6. P. 33–37 (in Russian).
26. Shastiko A.E. O metodologii institucional’nyh issledovanij [About the methodology of Institutional Research] // Economic Issues. 2016. N 8. P. 96–120 (in Russian).
27. Slatinov V.B. Reformirovanie gosudarstvennoj sluzhby v Rossii: institucional’nye ehffekty I lovushki [Reform of the civil service in Russia: institutional effects and pitfalls] // Russia and the Modern World. 2012. N 1. P. 79–90 (in Russian).
28. Tambovtsev V.L. Teorii institucional’nyh izmenenij [Theories of institutional change]. M., 2010 (in Russian). The Oxford handbook of political institutions / Ed. by R. Rhodes. Oxford, 2008.
29. Valeev H.A. Institut gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Federacii: politicopravovoe issledovanie [Institute of Public Service of the Russian Federation: political-legal research]: Dis. … Dr. of Polit. Sciences. M., 2011 (in Russian).
30. Williamson O. The theory of the firm as governance structure: from choice to contract // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2002. Vol. 16. N 3. P. 171–195.
31. Yakobson L.I. Reforma gosudarstvennoy sluzhby: interesy i prioritety [Civil service reform: the interests and priorities] // Obshchestvennyye nauki I sovremennost’. 2002. N 3. P. 5–22 (in Russian).
32. Zaytseva T.V. Reforma gosudarstvennoy sluzhby Rossii. Istoriya popytok reformirovaniya s 1992 po 2000 g. [The reform of Russian civil service.The history of efforts at reform from 1992 to 2000] / Ed. by T.V. Zaitseva. M., 2003 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Borshevskiy G.A. POLITICAL FACTORS OF NSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION OF RUSSIAN PUBLIC SERVICE. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2018;24(1):210-232. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-210-232