THE SOCIAL-HISTORIC PROCESS OF INDIVIDUALIZATION AND THE MECHANISMS OF ITS REALIZATION. PART II. THE FORMATION OF MODERN INDIVIDUAL AS THE “PROCESS OF CIVILIZATION”
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-2-7-29
Abstract
The process of individualization is a component of the general process of formation of modern societies. The other components are: the formation of capitalism, of industrialism, the process of democratization, urbanization, the formation of modern political and state order. The result of the process of individualization is formation of modern individual. The function and importance of the process is obviously underestimated in sociological theory as compared to the attention given to the processes of formation of capitalism or industrialism. This has become clear as the latest sociology has characterized the contemporary society as “individualized society”. The article is dedicated to the analysis of the social-historic process of individualization. Its aim is to bring to light the basic mechanisms through which this process was realized. These basic mechanisms are social differentiation, rationalization and civilization. The analysis of the mechanisms of individualization is based on classical and some contemporary sociological theories. The analysis of social differentiation takes the starting point in the analysis of methodo logical principles of theory of society and theory of social development of E. Durkheim and G. Simmel. The authors strive to point to the fundamentals of the historic process of social differentiation and its main stages. Rationalization is the main mechanism of the process of individualization. The sociological theories of M. Weber, M. Horkheimer and J. Habermas form the basis of its analysis in the article. This analysis also points to the fundamentals of the process of individualization and to its main stages. “Civilization” is the third mechanism of the process of individualization. The analysis of this mechanism is based on theories of N. Elias and M. Foucault. The article shows the interconnections of the mechanisms of differentiation rationalization and civilization in the social-historic process of individualization. The article also strives to show the significance of the principles of individual liberty and equality as fundamental to the modern ideology.
About the Authors
J. A. KimelevRussian Federation
Kimelev Juriy A. – Doct. philos. Sci., Professor, Chief Scientific Officer
Krzhizhanovskogo street, 15-2, Moscow, 117218
N. L. Polyakova
Russian Federation
Polyakova Natalya L. – Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor of the Faculty of Sociology
Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow, 119234
References
1. Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized society]. M., 2002 (in Russian).
2. Bedos-Rezak B., Logna-Prat D. (dir). L’individu au Moyen Âge. P., 2005.
3. Dobren’kov V.I., Osipova N.G. Istoriya zapadnoj sociologii (20–60-e gg. XIX v.) [The history of Western sociology (20–60-s of XX century.)]. M., 2012 (in Russian).
4. Donaggio E. Individuo e societá // Storia della filosifia occidentale. Vol. 6. Bologna, 2015. P. 165–194.
5. Dyurkgejm E.H. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sociologii [On the division of social labor. Method of sociology]. M., 1990 (in Russian).
6. Ehlias N. Obshchestvo individov [Society of Individuals]. M., 2001 (a) (in Russian).
7. Ehlias N. O processe civilizacii. Sociogeneticheskie i psihogeneticheskie issledovaniya. T. 1. Izmeneniya v povedenii vysshego sloya miryan v stranah zapada [About the process of civilization. Sociogenetic and psychogenetic studies. T. 1. Changes in the behavior of the upper strata of the laity in the countries of the west]. M.; SPb., 2001 (b) (in Russian).
8. Ehlias N. O processe civilizacii. Sociogeneticheskie i psihogeneticheskie issledovaniya. T. 2. Izmeneniya v obshchestve. Proekt teorii civilizacii [About the process of civilization. Sociogenetic and psychogenetic studies. T. 2. Changes in the society. The project of the theory of civilization]. M.; SPb., 2001 (c) (in Russian).
9. Foucault M. L’hermeneutique du sujet. P., 2001.
10. Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast’. CH. 1 [Intellectuals and Power. Part 1]. M., 2002 (in Russian).
11. Fuko M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’: rozhdenie tyur’my [Supervise and punish: the birth of a prison]. M., 2015 (in Russian).
12. Habermas J. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a/M., 1985. Bd. 1. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung (a).
13. Habermas J. Theorie des Kommunikative Handelns. Frankfurt a/M., 1985. Bd. 2. Zur Kritik der funktionalischen Vernunft (b).
14. Horkkhajmer M. Zatmenie razuma: k kritike instrumental’nogo razuma [Eclipse of reason: to criticism of instrumental reason]. M., 2011 (in Russian).
15. Horkkhajmer M., Adorno T. Dialektika Prosveshcheniya. Filosofskie fragment [Dialectics of Enlightenment. Philosophical fragments]. M.; SPb., 1997 (in Russian).
16. Kimelev Yu.A. “Sub’’ekt” i “sub’’ektivnost’” v sovremennoj zapadnoj social’noj filosofii [“Subject” and “subjectivity” in modern Western social philosophy]. M., 2006 (in Russian).
17. Kimelev Yu.A. Metodologiya social’nyh nauk [Methodology of social sciences]. M., 2011 (in Russian).
18. Kimelev Yu.A. Filosofiya social’nyh nauk [Philosophy of Social Sciences]. M., 2013 (in Russian).
19. Kimelev Yu.A. Filosofiya i sociologicheskaya teoriya. Sfery vzaimodejstviya [Philosophy and sociological theory. Spheres of interaction]. M., 2016 (in Russian).
20. Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Sociologicheskie teorii moderna, radikalizirovannogo moderna i postmoderna [Sociological theories of modernity, radical modernity and postmodernity]. M., 1996 (in Russian).
21. Kimelev Yu.A., Polyakova N.L. Filosofiya social’nyh nauk [Philosophy of Social Sciences] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2014. N 1. S. 20–46 (in Russian).
22. L’individu aujourdoui / Sous la direction de Ph. Corcuff, Chr. Le Barth, F. De Singly. Rennes, 2010.
23. Polyakova N.L. Teoriya obshchestva Maksa Vebera [Theory of Max Weber’s Society] // Istoriya sociologii XIX – serediny XX veka [History of Sociology of the XIX – the middle of the XX century]. M., 2004. S. 368–401 (a) (in Russian).
24. Polyakova N.L. XX vek v sociologicheskih teoriyah obshchestva [XX century in the sociological theories of society]. M., 2004 (b) (in Russian).
25. Polyakova N.L. Sociologicheskaya teoriya Georga Zimmelya [Sociological theory of Georg Simmel] // Istoriya sociologii (XIX – seredina XX veka) [History of sociology (XIX – middle of XX century)]. M., 2004. S. 309–339 (c) (in Russian).
26. Searle J.R. Making the social world. N.Y., 2010.
27. Simmel G. Soziologie. Frankfurt a/M., 1992.
28. Toffler A. The third wave. N.Y., 1980.
29. Touraine A. Critique de la modernité. P., 1992.
30. Turen A. Vozvrashchenie cheloveka dejstvuyushchego: ocherk sociologii [Return of the person acting: essay of sociology]. M., 1998 (in Russian).
31. Veber M. Istoriya hozyajstva [History of the economy]. Praga, 1923 (in Russian).
32. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. M., 1990 (in Russian).
33. Veber M. Izbrannoe. Obraz obshchestva [Selected. The image of society]. M., 1994 (in Russian).
34. Weber M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen, 1972.
35. Yacino M. Kul’tura individualizma [Culture of individualism]. H., 2012 (in Russian).
36. Zimmel’ G. Izbrannoe. T. 1. Filosofiya kul’tury [Selected. 1. Philosophy of Culture]. M., 1996 (a) (in Russian).
37. Zimmel’ G. Izbrannoe. T. 2. Sozercanie zhizni [Selected. T. 2. Contemplation of life]. M., 1996 (b) (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kimelev J.A., Polyakova N.L. THE SOCIAL-HISTORIC PROCESS OF INDIVIDUALIZATION AND THE MECHANISMS OF ITS REALIZATION. PART II. THE FORMATION OF MODERN INDIVIDUAL AS THE “PROCESS OF CIVILIZATION”. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2018;24(2):7-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-2-7-29