Theories of reference group and revolution: general theoretical matrix of relative deprivation

The article is an overview of the first stage in the development of relative deprivation theories during the 1940–1970s: theories of reference group and revolution. The concepts of “relative deprivation” and “reference group” appeared in 1949 and 1942, respectively. Further specification of reference group concept statements by H. Hyman, R. Merton, W. Runciman, R. Williams contributed to the formulation of relative deprivation theory. The definition of the forms of reference objects (individual, collective, social category), types of comparisons, essence and functional types of reference groups (comparative, normative, identification, and audience) allowed to describe types of relative deprivation, its essence, content (cognitive and affective), and also it’s levels: individual and group. However, reference group theorists have also identified a lot of problematic issues requiring further scientific development. One such issue, problems of relative deprivation formation, is considered within the framework of the theories of revolution through the analysis of social changes. Within the theories of revolution of the 1960s–1970s two approaches of understanding the essence of relative deprivation have emerged: theories of frustrationaggression (T. Gurr, J. Davies, D. Lerner, I. and R. Feierabends) and status inconsistency (J. Urry, C. Johnson, E. Hoffer). Works of the adherents of the first approach have made it possible to expand the field of relative deprivation study, but also they have become the subject of wide criticism. Focusing on the reference group theory and problems of collective identity research J. Urry’s approach was better integrated into the tradition of relative deprivation studying.

relative deprivation, reference group theory, theories of revolution, frustration-aggression theory, theory of status inconsistency

1. Albert S. Temporal comparison theory // Psychological Review. 1977. Vol. 84. N 6. P. 485–503.

2. Beaton A., Tougas F. The representation of women in management: the more, the merrier? // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997. Vol. 23. N 7. P. 773–782.

3. Benoit-Smullyan E. Status, status types, and status interrelation // American Sociological Review. 1944. Vol. 9. N 2. P. 151–161.

4. Berkowitz L. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation // Psychological Bulletin. 1989. Vol. 106. N 1. P. 59–73.

5. Burke P., Stets J. Identity Theory. N.Y., 2009.

6. Crosby F. A model of egoistical relative deprivation // Psychological Review. 1976. Vol. 83. N 2. P. 85–113.

7. Davies J. Toward a theory of revolution // American Sociological Review. 1962. Vol. 27. N 1. P. 5–19.

8. Davies J. When men revolt and why. N.Y., 1970.

9. Davis J. A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation // Sociometry. 1959. Vol. 22. N 4. P. 280–296.

10. Dollard J. et al. Frustration and aggression. New Haven, 1939.

11. Ellemers N., Bos A. Individual and group level responses to threat experienced by Dutch shopkeepers in East-Amsterdam // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1998. Vol. 28. N 21. P. 1987–2005.

12. Feierabend I., Feierabend, R. et al. Social and political violence // Violence in America / Ed. by H. Graham, T. Gurr. Washington, 1969.

13. Finkel S., Rule J. Relative deprivation and related psychological theories of civil violence: a critical review // Research in Social Movements: Conflicts and Change. 1987. Vol. 9. P. 47–69.

14. Foster M., Matheson K. Double relative deprivation: combining the personal and political // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995. Vol. 21. P. N 11. 1167–1177.

15. Geschwender J.A. Continuities in theories of status consistency and cognitive dissonance // Social Forces. 1967. Vol. 46. N 2. P. 160–171.

16. Goffman I. Status consistency and preference for change in power distribution // American Sociological Review. 1957. Vol. 22. N 3. P. 275–281.

17. Gurney P., Tierney K. Relative deprivation and social movements: a critical look at twenty years of theory and research // Sociological Quarterly. 1982. Vol. 23. N 1. P. 33–47.

18. Gurr T.R. Why men rebel. Princeton, 1970.

19. Hoffer E. The ordeal of change. N.Y., 1964.

20. Homans G. Social behavior: its elementary forms. N.Y., 1961.

21. Hyman H. The psychology of status // Archives of Psychology. 1942. N 269.

22. Hyman H., Singer E. Readings in reference group theory and research. N.Y., 1968.

23. Jasso G. Social consequences of the sense of distributive justice: small-group applications // Equity Theory. Psychological and Sociological Perspectives / Ed. by D. Messick, K. Cook. N.Y., 1983.

24. Johnson C. Revolutionary change. Boston, 1966.

25. Lenski G. Status crystallization: a non-vertical dimension of social status // American Sociological Review. 1954. Vol. 19. N 4. P. 405–413.

26. Maier N. Frustration: the study of behavior without a goal. N.Y., 1949.

27. Merton R. K. Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, 1957.

28. Meyer J.W., Hammond P.E. Forms of status inconsistency // Social Forces. 1971. Vol. 50. N 1. P. 91–101.

29. Miller N. The frustration-aggression hypothesis // Psychological Review. 1941. Vol. 48. N. 4. P. 337–342.

30. Morrison D. Some notes toward theory on relative deprivation, social movements, and social change // Processes and Phenomena of Social Change / Ed. by G. Zaltman. N.Y., 1973.

31. Newcomb T. Personality and social change. N.Y., 1943.

32. Patchen M. A Conceptual framework and some empirical data regarding comparisons of social rewards // Sociometry. 1961. Vol. 24. N 2. P. 136–156.

33. Relative deprivation: specification, development, and integration. Cambridge, 2002.

34. Runciman W. Relative deprivation and social justice: a study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth century England. L., 1972.

35. Runciman W., Bagley C. Status consistency, relative deprivation, and attitudes to immigrants // Sociology. 1969. Vol. 3. N 3. P. 359–375.

36. Sampson E. Status congruence and cognitive consistency // Sociometry. 1963. Vol. 26. N 2. P. 146–162.

37. Sherif M. An outline of social psychology. N.Y., 1948.

38. Stouffer S., Suchman E. et al. The American Soldier: adjustment during army life. Princeton, 1949.

39. Taylor M. Improved conditions, rising expectations and dissatisfaction: a test of the past/present relative deprivation hypothesis // Social Psychology Quarterly. 1982. Vol. 45. N 1. P. 24–33.

40. Turner R. H. Role taking, role standpoint, and reference-group behavior // American Journal of Sociology. 1956. Vol. 61. N 4. P. 316–328.

41. Turner J. Psychoanalytic sociological theories and emotion // Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions / Ed. by J. Stets, J. Turner. N.Y., 2006.

42. Urry J. Reference groups and the theory of revolution. Lancaster, 1973.

43. Williams R. Relative deprivation // The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton / Ed. by L. Coser. N.Y., 1975.

44. Zimmermann E. “Bringing common sense back in”: some neglected assumptions in status inconsistency theory and research // Archives Europeennes de Sociologie. 1978. Vol. 19. N 12. P. 53–73.