Тhe effectiveness of political management in the context of the introduction of “e-government”

The article is devoted to the influence of “e-government” on the effectiveness of political management. At the same time, by “electronic government” is meant the informatization of the activities of public authorities and local government, as well as the interaction of these bodies with society through electronic technologies. This article is an attempt to comprehend the mechanisms of influence of information and communication technologies on the political and administrative efficiency in the context of significant transformative potential of these technologies in politics. The presented study is based on a neoinstitutional methodology and comparative analysis that has made it possible to identify the institutional significance and links of “e-government”, the impact of existing formal and informal norms and rules for the implementation of e-government on the effectiveness of political governance, to assess the impact of the process of informatization of the state apparatus on quality of the functioning of government institutions. The problem of the effectiveness of political management is considered in the article from the point of view of achieving the objectives of subjects of management activity – political elites. Due to the fact that the main objectives of the subjects of political governance are, on the one hand, access to government resources and retention of power (overbearing aspect), on the other hand, the achievement of certain performance society development (social, economic and others indicator; administrative aspect), the influence of “e-government” on the effectiveness of political management is proposed to be assessed from the perspective of contributing to the achievement of these goals. The main conclusion of the study is that the impact of “e-government” on the effectiveness of political governance is complex and depends on the forms and directions of its implementation, as well as the quality of existing political institutions.

1. Barykin D.V., Borovin Iu.M., Latysheva O.P., Prisada S.A. Obzor sovremennykh tendentsii razvitiia tekhnologii v sistemakh elektronnogo mezhvedomstvennogo dokumentooborota // Izvestiia Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta MAMI. 2013. T. 1. N 4 (18). S. 312–315 (in Russian).

2. Deutsch K. The nerves of government: models of political communication and control. N.Y., 1966.

3. Federal’nyi zakon ot 27.07.2010 № 210-FZ “Ob organizatsii predostavleniia gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh uslug”. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_103023/ (in Russian).

4. Fontein Dzh.E. Institutsional’noe razvitie v virtual’nom gosudarstve: nedostaiushchee zveno v tekhnologicheskom videnii E-Government // Politicheskaia nauka. 2007. N 4 (in Russian).

5. Geits B. Biznes so skorost’iu mysli. Kak dobit’sia uspekha v informatsionnuiu eru. M., 2000 (in Russian).

6. Gobbs T. Leviafan, ili Materiia, forma i vlast’ gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo // Gobbs T. Soch.: V 2 t. T. 2. M., 1991 (in Russian).

7. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie // Uchenye zapiski SKAGS. 2006. Vyp. N 1–2 (in Russian).

8. Guliaeva V.B. Elektronnye gosudarstvennye uslugi dlia biznesa // Rossiia i Germaniia: ekonomika regionov posle sanktsii. SPb., 2015. S. 183–185 (in Russian).

9. Edinyi portal biudzhetnoi sistemy RF “Elektronnyi biudzhet”. URL: http://budget.gov.ru/ (in Russian).

10. Informatsionno-analiticheskie materialy Gosudarstvennoi Dumy. URL: http://iam.duma.gov.ru/ (in Russian).

11. Kislitsyn S.A., Starostin A.M. Effektivnost’ deiatel’nosti gosudarstvennoi vlasti i upravleniia: kriterii, otsenki, analiz sostoianiia, puti povysheniia (elitologicheskii askpet). Rostov n/D., 2005 (in Russian).

12. Lasswell H.D. The structure and function of communication in society // The Communication of Ideas / Ed. by Bryson. N.Y., 1948.

13. Minkomsviaz’ Rossii. Gosudarstvennaia avtomatizirovannaia informatsionnaia sistema “Upravlenie” (GAS “Upravlenie”). URL: http://minsvyaz.ru/ru/activity/govservices/infosystems/1/ (in Russian).

14. Novikova N.G., Gladyshev A.S. Problemy formirovaniia i perspektivy razvitiia sistemy elektronnykh gosudarstvennykh uslug v Rossii // Servis plus. 2014. N 2. S. 52–56 (in Russian).

15. Ofitsial’nyi sait GD FS RF. URL: http://www.duma.gov.ru/systems/law/ (in Russian).

16. Petrova A.S. Sistema “Otkrytoe pravitel’stvo” kak faktor formirovaniia grazhdanskoi kul’tury sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva // Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2014. N 6 (66). S. 154–160 (in Russian).

17. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 22.09.2009 N 754 “Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniia o sisteme mezhvedomstvennogo elektronnogo dokumentooborota”. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_91827/ (in Russian).

18. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 25.12.2009 N 1088 (red. ot 27.11.2015) «O gosudarstvennoi avtomatizirovannoi informatsionnoi sisteme “Upravlenie” ». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_95553/ (in Russian).

19. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 26.02.2010 N 96 (red. ot 18.07.2015) “Ob antikorruptsionnoi ekspertize normativnykh pravovykh aktov i proektov normativnykh pravovykh aktov”. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_98088/ (in Russian).

20. Ragulina Iu.V., Avakian N.S., Skakova Zh.N. Predostavlenie gosudarstvennykh uslug v elektronnom vide // Vestnik Akademii. 2014. N 2. S. 89–92 (in Russian).

21. Rasporiazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 20.07.2011 N 1275-r (red. ot 03.03.2017) «O Kontseptsii sozdaniia i razvitiia gosudarstvennoi integrirovannoi informatsionnoi sistemy upravleniia obshchestvennymi finansami “Elektronnyi biudzhet” ». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_117479/#dst100006 (in Russian).

22. Romanova N.P., Lavrik N.V. Rol’ grazhdanskoi initsiativy v formirovanii elektronnoi demokratii // Vestnik Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2016. N 2. S. 83–89 (in Russian).

23. Saimon G.A. Ratsional’nost’ kak protsess i produkt myshleniia // THESIS. 1993. Vyp. 3. URL: https://igiti.hse.ru/data/003/314/1234/3_1_2Simon.pdf (in Russian).

24. Sapin M.R., Bocharov V.Ia., Nikitiuk D.B. i dr. Anatomiia cheloveka: V 2 t. T. 2 / Pod red. M.R. Sapina. M., 2001 (in Russian).

25. Shabrov O.F. Politicheskoe upravlenie: problema stabil’nosti i razvitiia. M., 1997. URL: http://shabrov.info/Polupr/glava2.htm (in Russian).

26. Skakova Zh.N. Predostavlenie gosudarstvennykh uslug v elektronnom vide // Innovatsionnaia ekonomika: informatsiia, analitika, prognozy. 2014. N 1–2. 2014 (in Russian).

27. Stepanova A.M. Predostavlenie gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh uslug v elektronnom vide: issledovanie, analiz, napravleniia sovershenstvovaniia // Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsionnykh tekhnologii. 2014. N 1. S. 30–33 (in Russian).

28. Starostin A.M. Effektivnost’ deiatel’nosti administrativno-politicheskikh elit: kriterii otsenki i analiz sostoianiia v sovremennoi Rossii. Diss. ... dokt. polit. nauk: 23.00.02. Rostov n/D., 2003 (in Russian).

29. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 23.05.1996 N 763 “O poriadke opublikovaniia i vstupleniia v silu aktov Prezidenta RF, Pravitel’stva RF i normativnykh pravovykh aktov federal’nykh organov ispolnitel’noi vlasti”. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10482/ (in Russian).

30. Viner N. Kibernetika, ili upravlenie i sviaz’ v zhivotnom i mashine. M., 1983 (in Russian). (in Russian).

31. Volodin D.V. Problemy organizatsii mezhvedomstvennogo elektronnogo dokumentooborota // Vestnik arkhivista. 2012. N 1 (117). S. 147–162 (in Russian).

32. Voloshinskaia A.A. “Rossiiskaia obshchestvennaia initsiativa”: paradoksy otechestvennoi elektronnoi demokratii // Vlast’. 2016. N 1. S. 47–51 (in Russian).