Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Institutes of inequality in modern society

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-1-7-28

Abstract

The ambiguous process of global changes associated with the growing instability of modern society, the aggravation of the social tension in the world between developed and developing countries, the opposition of the well-being of the chosen minority to disadvantage and poverty of the majority, has highlighted the imperfection of existing institutions and the need to move to a new model of the social world order. On the basis of institutional analysis, the article reveals the inefficiency of the functioning of public institutions, which leads to the reproduction of unstable structural social interactions and the opposition of various societies, groups, individuals. The problem of transforming existing institutions into institutions of inequality turns into a system (structure-forming) and becomes relevant both in fundamental theoretical development and in its practical solution in ensuring the development and enhancement of the vitality of modern society.
As a result of the research it was shown that the systemic crisis of modern capitalist society is, first of all, an institutional crisis related to the imperfection and inefficiency of the functioning of its key institutions (family, property and state). They essentially stopped (or cease) in various ways to promote social development and began to turn into institutions of inequality at different levels of the social system and encompass its various structural elements: at the level of the institution of the family it is associated with the beginning of the deformation of the institutional matrix of the relationship between a man and a woman (gender balance between role positions); at the level of the institution of property, it is predetermined by the concentration of power and the distribution of resources in the hands of pseudoelites; at the state level, it is due to the fact that it is being transformed into a supranational corporation, which, depending on the nature of its legitimacy (or illegitimacy), reproduces certain permissible (or unacceptable) limits of social inequality.

About the Author

Alexander Sh. Viktorov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Doctor of sociology, Full Professor, Faculty of sociology

Leninsky Gory, 1-33, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119234



References

1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proishozhdenie vlasti, procvetanija i nishhety [Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty] M., 2017 (in Russian).

2. Akopjan A.S. Rol’ semejnyh cennostej v pererozhdenii institutov gosudarstva: biosocialnyj aspekt // Istoricheskaja psihologija i sociologija istorii. 2011. N 1 (in Russian).

3. Barulin V.S. Social’naja filosofija. M., 2002 (in Russian).

4. Beck U. Chto takoe globalizacija? [Was ist globalisierung?]. M., 2001 (in Russian).

5. Boulz S. Mikrojekonomika. Povedenie, instituty i jevoljucija. M., 2010 (in Russian).

6. Filimonov V.P. Rakovaja opuhol’ na tele Rossii. URL: https://obshestvomt.ru/ blog/43919427122/Rakovaya-opuhol-na-tele-Rossii (data obrastheniya: 10.08.2018) (in Russian).

7. Gegel’ G. Sobr. soch. T. 7. M.; L., 1934 (in Russian).

8. Giddens A. Ustroenie obshhestva: ocherk teorii strukturacii. M., 2003 (in Russian).

9. Held D., McGrew A., Goldblatt D., Perraton J. Global’nye transformacii. Politika, jekonomika i kul’tura [Global transformations: politics, economics and culture]. M., 2004 (in Russian).

10. Hodzhson Dzh. Chto takoe instituty? // Voprosy jekonomiki. 2007. Avgust. N 8. P. 28–48 (in Russian).

11. Ivanov A. Kak zhenskij individualizm i jegoizm vlijajut na jekonomicheskuju model’ obshhestva. URL: http://yablor.ru/blogs/kak-jenskiy-individualizm-i- egoizm-/3154475. 15.11.2013 (in Russian).

12. Ivanov A. O tom, kak promyvajut zhenshhinam mozgi. URL: http://maxpark. com/community/5932/content/2310854 (data obrastheniya: 12.11.2013) (in Russian).

13. Kant I. Sochinenija. V 6-ti t. T. 4. M., 1965. Ch. 1 (in Russian).

14. Lokk D. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedenija. T. 2. M., 1960 (in Russian).

15. Mizes L., fon. Individ, rynok i pravovoe gosudarstvo. SPb., 2006 (in Russian).

16. Luhmann N. Globalizacija mirovogo soobshhestva: Kak sleduet ponimat’ sovremennoe obshhestvo [Globalization of the world community: the way contemporary societyshould be understood systematically] // Sociologija na poroge XXI veka: Novye napravlenija issledovanij. M., 1998 (in Russian).

17. Mills Ch.W. Vlastvujushhaja jelita [The Power Elite] M., 2007 (in Russian).

18. Nacional’naja ideja Rossii: V 6 t. T. 3. M., 2012 (in Russian).

19. North D.C., Wallis J.J., Weingast B.R. Nasilie i social’nye porjadki. Konceptual’nye ramki dlja interpretacii pis’mennoj istorii chelovechestva [Violence and social orders. A conceptual Framework for interpreting recorded human history]. M., 2011 (in Russian).

20. Nurev R.M. Ocherki po istorii institucionalizma. Rostov n/D., 2014 (in Russian).

21. Oujen R. Kniga o novom nravstvennom mire. Izbr. soch.: V 2-h. T. 2. M.-L., 1950 (in Russian).

22. Prudon P. Chto takoe sobstvennost’. M., 1919 (in Russian).

23. Rozanov V.V. Uedinennoe. M., 1990. T. 2 (in Russian).

24. Social’noe neravenstvo i publichnaja politika. M., 2007 (in Russian).

25. Stiglitz J.E. Cena neravenstva. Chem rassloenie obshhestva grozit nashemu budushhemu. [The price of inequality: how today’s divided society endangers our future]. M., 2015 (in Russian).

26. Torando E.E. Sociologija sobstvennosti. SPb., 2001 (in Russian).

27. Leturno Sh. Jevoljucija sobstvennosti. M., 2012 (in Russian).

28. Veblen T. Teorija prazdnogo klassa [The Theory of the Leisure Class ]. M., 2018 (in Russian).

29. Viktorov A.Sh. Vvedenie v sociologiju neravenstva. M., 2015 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Viktorov A.Sh. Institutes of inequality in modern society. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2019;25(1):7-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-1-7-28

Views: 1725


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)