Possibilities and limitations of the key methodological approaches to the study of happiness
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-7-35
Abstract
In recent years, the issue of happiness, including the practical searches for it, has become phenomenally popular. However, this trend was set many decades ago, already in the 1970s, when the first empirical studies were conducted to reveal that the personal feeling and self-identification as happy/unhappy are related to the pursuit of pleasure (i.e. to hedonism as a lifestyle). Over the past decades, happiness has become a legitimate object of conceptual and methodological research within almost all humanities, social and even natural sciences due to the fact that searches for the definition and acquisition of happiness went far beyond the limits of fiction that has always been involved in providing people with answers to questions on what happiness is and how to find one’s place in life. As a result, today every scientific discipline should outline the contours of its own interpretation of happiness albeit not a single one, not an unambiguous one and not without intersections with other disciplines’ approaches. The article aims at systematizing methodological approaches to the sociological analysis of happiness and identification of their possibilities and limitations. The authors show that sociologists can use a huge variety of works with different conceptual and operational definitions of happiness, and many methods to assess the level of happiness and the factors determining it. The presented review is not complete or final, it only systematizes the developments in the study of happiness and identifies two promising directions for further sociological searches — the “objectivist” econometric approach (happiness indexes based on social-economic indicators) and the “subjectivist” social-psychological approach (self-assessments of happiness in public opinion polls).
About the Authors
I. V. Trotsuk
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Trotsuk Irina V., Doctor of Sociology, Professor of Sociology Department
Miklukho-Maklaya Str. 6, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198
V. Ye. Grebneva
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grebneva Valeriya Ye., PhD in Sociology, Postgraduate students tutor, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Miklukho-Maklaya Str. 6, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198
References
1. Andrews F.M., Withey S.B. Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality. N.Y., 1976.
2. Argyle M. Psikhologiya schastya [The Psychology of Happiness]. SPb., 2003 (in Russian).
3. Aristotle. Nikomakhova etika [Nicomachean Ethics] // Aristotle. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 4. M., 1983 (in Russian).
4. Bengli Sh. Schastlivy vmesto [Happy instead] // Russky Newsweek [Russian Newsweek]. 2008. N 8 (in Russian).
5. Bradburn N.M., Noll C.E. The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Chicago, 1969.
6. Chepurnykh M.N. Indeksy schastya: opyt Zapada (sotsiologicheskiy obzor) [Happiness indexes: Western experience (a sociological review)]. URL: http://www.teoria-practica.ru/-9-2012/sociology/chepurnykh.pdf (accessed: 26.12.2018) (in Russian).
7. Csikszentmihalyi M. Potok: psikhologiya optimalnogo perezhivaniya [Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience]. M., 2011 (in Russian).
8. Davidson D. Essays on actions and events. Oxford, 1980.
9. Duncan G. What do we mean by “happiness”? The relevance of subjective well-being to social policy // Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2005. Vol. 25.
10. Easterlin R.A. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence // Nations Are Households in Economic Growth / Ed. by P.A. David, M.W. Reder. N.Y., 1974.
11. Easterlin R. Will raising the income of all increase the happiness of all? // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1995. Vol. 27.
12. Easterlin R. Income and happiness: towards a unified theory // Economic Journal. 2001. Vol. III.
13. Elster J. Kisly vinograd. Issledovanie provalov ratsionalnosti [Sour Grapes:
14. Studies in the Subversion of Rationality] / Nauch. red. A. Morozova. M., 2018 (in Russian).
15. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A., Frijters P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? // Economic Journal. 2004. Vol. 114. N 497.
16. Kachur N.V. Molodezhnoe vospriyatie schastya (po rezultatam sotsiologicheskogo oprosa) [The youth’s perception of happiness (based on the sociological survey)] // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [News of Saratov University. Series: Sociology. Political Science]. 2013. Vol. 13. Issue 3 (in Russian).
17. Kahneman D. Dumay medlenno… reshay bistro [Think Slowly… Decide Quickly]. M., 2014 (in Russian).
18. Kahneman D., Krueger A.B. Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006. Vol. 20. N 1.
19. Kahneman D., Slovik P., Tversky A. Prinyatie resheny v neopredelennosti [Decision Making in Uncertainty]. SPb., 2004 (in Russian).
20. Killingsworth M.A., Gilbert D.T. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind // Science. 2010. Vol. 12. N 330.
21. Layard R. Schastye. Uroki novoy nauki [Happiness: Lessons from a New Science]. M., 2012 (in Russian).
22. Leibniz G.V. Nachala prirody i blagodati, osnovannye na razume [Principles of nature and grace based on reason] // Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1982 (in Russian).
23. Levit L.Z. Issledovanie osnovnykh ponyatiy pozitivnoy psikhologii s pomoshchyu metodov vyborki perezhivaniy (ESM) [Study of the basic concepts of positive psychology using sampling techniques experiences (ESM)] // Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Contemporary Foreign Psychology]. 2013. N 3 (in Russian).
24. Mishlanova S.L., Suvorova M.V., Zhdanova S.Yu., Strokanov A.A. Verbalnaya i zhestovaya reprezentatsii naivnogo predstavleniya o schastye v ustnom narrative amerikanskikh studentov [Verbal and gestural representations of the naive idea of happiness in the oral narrative of American students] // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Series: Russian and Foreign Philology]. 2014. Iss. 4 (in Russian).
25. Namlinskaya O.O. “Ekonomika schastya”: osobennosti opredeleniya i perspektivy razvitiya v usloviyakh modernizatsii [“Economics of Happiness”: Definition and prospects for the development under modernization] // Regionalnye problemy preobrazovany ekonomiki [Regional Problems of Economic Transformations]. 2014. N 4 (in Russian).
26. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A. Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnykh versy dvukh shkal ekspress-otsenki subiektivnogo blagopoluchiya [Testing of the Russian-language versions of the two scales for the express-assessment of subjective well-being] // Materialy III Vserossiyskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa [Proceedings of the III All-Russian Sociological Congress]. M., 2008 (in Russian).
27. Rodionova L.A. Metodologicheskie aspekty izmereniya i modelirovaniya urovnya schastya [Methodological aspects of measuring and modeling the level of happiness] // Voprosy statistiki [Statistics Issues]. 2012. N 6 (in Russian). Rozanov V.V. Tsel chelovecheskoy zhizni [The Purpose of Human Life]. Moscow, 1994 (in Russian).
28. Ryzhkova Yu.A., Klimashina E.A. Mezhdunarodny indeks schastya kak pokazatel blagosostoyaniya natsii [International index of happiness as an indicator of the welfare of the nation] // Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tekhnike, prirode [Models, Systems, Networks in the Economy, Technology, Nature]. 2011. N 3 (in Russian).
29. Seligman M.E.P. Novaya pozitivnaya psikhologiya: Nauchnyy vzglyad na schastye i smysl zhizni [New Positive Psychology: A Scientific View of Happiness and Meaning of Life]. M., 2006 (in Russian).
30. Sen A. Ideya spravedlivosti [The Idea of Justice] / Per. s angl. D. Kralechkina; nauch. red. V. Sofronova, A. Smirnova. M., 2016 (in Russian).
31. Shmatova Yu.E., Morev M.V. Izmerenie urovnya schastya: literaturny obzor rossiyskikh i zarubezhnykh issledovany [Measuring the level of happiness: A review of Russian and foreign studies] // Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. 2015. N 3 (in Russian).
32. Smoleva E.O., Morev M.V. Udovletvorennost zhiznyu i uroven schastya: vzglyad sotsiologa [Life Satisfaction and Level of Happiness: Sociological Approach]. M., 2016 (in Russian).
33. Sokolova M.V. Shkala subiektivnogo blagopoluchiya [The Scale of Subjective Well-Being]. Yaroslavl, 1996 (in Russian).
34. Sotov A. Kto v mire samyy schastlivyy? [Who is the happiest in the world?] // Rossiyskaya gazeta [Russian Newspaper]. 2012.14.06 (in Russian).
35. Tatarkiewicz W. O schastye i sovershenstve cheloveka [On Happiness and Human Perfection] / Per. s polsk. L.V. Konovalovoy. M., 1981 (in Russsian).
36. Tov W., Diener E. Subjective well-being // Research Collection of School of Social Sciences. Paper 1395. URL: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1395 (accessed: 10.11.2018).
37. Veenhoven R. Hedonism and happiness // Journal of Happiness Studies. 2003. N 4.
38. Veenhoven R. Questions on happiness: classical topics, modern answers, blind spots // Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective / Ed. by F. Strack, M. Argyle, N. Schwarz. Oxford, 1991.
39. World Happiness Report 2018 // New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network / Ed. by J. Helliwell, R. Layard R., J. Sachs. URL: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2018 (accessed: 13.12.2018).
40. Zhdanova S.Yu., Pecherkina A.V., Strokanov A.A. Struktura reprezentatsii sostoyaniya schastya u predstaviteley rossiyskoy i amerikanskoy kultur [The structure of the representation of happiness in the Russian and American cultures] // Obrazovanie i nauka [Education and Science]. 2017. Vol. 19. N 7 (in Russian).
41. Zhuravlev A.L. Schastye kak nauchnaya kategoriya [Happiness as a scientific category] // Vestnik RAN [Bulletin of RAS]. 2014. Vol. 84. N 8 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Trotsuk I.V., Grebneva V.Ye. Possibilities and limitations of the key methodological approaches to the study of happiness. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2019;25(3):7-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-7-35
Views:
1431
Email this article 