Методологический статус времени в политической науке
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-122-152
Аннотация
В современной политической науке время все более становится концептом-портманто. Оно входит в состав терминологических конкатенаций в самых различных сферах прикладных и теоретических исследований. Вместе с тем, методологический статус времени остается почти не изученым вопросом в политологии. Автор предлагает систематизацию тех исследований в политической науке, в которых время представлено как значимый фактор политического процесса. Было выделено четыре подхода, исходя из анализа их теоретического обоснования, методологии и практического инструментария: структуралистский, психологический, институциональный и циклическовременной подходы. Предложенная последовательность подходов основана на степени интенциональности субъектов политического интереса в их обращении со временем: от наиболее к наименее осознанному порядку.
Об авторе
О. Д. Шебло
Университет Гакусюин
Япония
Япония
Шебло Олеся Дмитриевна - канд. полит. наук, докт.
1-5-1 Меджиро, Тошима-ку, Токио, 171-8588
Список литературы
1. Aminzade R. Historical sociology and time // Sociological Methods & Research. 1992. May. Vol. 20 (4). P. 456–480.
2. Ancona D.G., Okhuysen G.A., Perlow L.A. Taking time to integrate temporal research // The Academy of Management Review. 2001. Oct. Vol. 26 (4). P. 512–529.
3. Bachelard G. The dialectic of duration. Manchester, 2000.
4. Barkin J.S. Time horizons and multilateral enforcement in international cooperation // International Studies Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 48. P. 363–382.
5. Beck N. Elections and the Fed: is there a political monetary cycle? // American Journal of Political Science. 1987. Febr. Vol. 31 (1). P. 194–216.
6. Beck N. The illusion of cycles in international relations // International Studies Quarterly. 1991. Dec. Vol. 35 (4). P. 455–476.
7. Bergson H. Time and free will. Sydney, 1913.
8. Braudel F. Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue duree // Annales: Economies, Societes, Civilisations. 1958. N 4. P. 725–753.
9. Crossan M., Pina e Cunha M., Vera D., Cunha J. Time and organizational improvisation // The Academy of Management Review. 2005. Jan. Vol. 30 (1). P. 129–145.
10. Elias N. Time: an essay. Oxford, 1992.
11. Ekengren М. The time of European governance. Manchester, 2002.
12. Ferrarotti F. Time, memory, and society // Contributions in Sociology. 1990. N 91.
13. Gell A. The anthropology of time. Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford, 1996.
14. Goetz K. The EU timescape: an emergent temporal order. Ch. 8 // Institutional Dynamics and the Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe / Ed. by M. Egeberg. Mannheim, 2007. P. 263–290.
15. Goetz K. How does EU tick? Five propositions on political time // Journal of European Public Policy. 2009. March. Vol. 16 (2). P. 202–220.
16. Goldstein J.S. Kondratieff waves as war cycles // International Studies Quarterly. 1985. Dec. Vol. 29 (4). P. 411–444.
17. Gurvitch G. The spectrum of social time. Dordrecht, 1964. Halliday T. Time and temporality in global governance // Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications / Ed. by P.
18. Drahos. 2017. Canberra, P. 303–321.
19. Halliday T., Carruthers B.G. Foiling the hegemons: limits to the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes in Indonesia, Korea and China // Globalization and Resistance: Law Reform in Asia since the Crisis / Ed. by C. Anton, V. Gessner. Oxford, P. 255–301. K
20. ahn P.W. Political time: sovereignty and the transtemporal community // Cardozo Law Review. 2006. Vol. 28 (1). P. 259–276.
21. Kondratieff N.D., Stolper W.F. The long waves in economic life // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1935. Nov. Vol. 17 (6). P. 105–115.
22. Koselleck R. Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, 1985.
23. Kovats L. Do elections set the pace? A quantitative assessment of the timing of European legislation // Journal of the European Public Policy. 2009. March. P. 239–255.
24. Lefebvre H. Rhythmanalysis: space, time, and everyday life. L.; N.Y., 2004.
25. Levy J.S. War in the modern great power system, 1495–1975. Lexington, 1983.
26. Linz J.J. Democracy’s time constraints // International Political Science Review. 1998. Vol. 19 (1). P. 19–37.
27. Luhmann N. The future cannot begin: temporal structures in modern society // Social Research. Vol. 43 (1). P. 130–152.
28. Mahoney J. Path dependence in historical sociology // Theory and Society. 2000. Vol. 29. P. 507–548.
29. Osborne P. The politics of time: modernity and avant-garde. L.; N.Y., 1995.
30. Ornstein R.E. On the experience of time. L., 1969.
31. Pierson P. Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton, 2004.
32. Pinfari M. Peace negotiations and time: deadline diplomacy in territorial disputes. L., 2013.
33. Pinfari M. Time to agree: is time pressure good for peace negotiations? // The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2011. Oct. Vol. 55 (5). P. 683–709.
34. Portella E. Future without a future // Time in the making and possible futures / Ed. by E.R. Larreta. L., 2000.
35. Riescher G. Zeit and Politik. Baden-Baden, 1994.
36. Sayrs L.W. The long cycle in international relations: a Markov specification // International Studies Quarterly. 1993. June. Vol. 37 (2). P. 215–237.
37. Schedler A., Santiso J. Democracy and time: an invitation // International Political Science Review. 1998. Vol. 19 (1). P. 5–18.
38. Schuman H., Corning A., Schwartz B. Framing variations and collective memory. “Honest Abe” versus “the great emancipator” // Social Science History. 2012. Winter. Vol. 36 (4). P. 451–472.
39. Schwartz B. Rethinking the concept of collective memory // Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies / Ed. by A.L. Tota, T. Hagen. N.Y., 2016. P. 27–39.
40. Schwartz B., Schuman H. History, commemoration, and belief: Abraham Lincoln in American memory, 1945–2001 // American Sociological Review. 2005. Vol. 70 (2). P. 183–203.
41. Schwartz B., Zerubavel Ya., Barnett B. Recovery of Masada: a study in collective memory // Sociological Quaterly. 1986. N 27. P. 147–164.
42. Sorokin P., Merton R.K. Social time: a methodological and functional analysis // The American Journal of Sociology. 1937. March. Vol. XLII (5). P. 615–629.
43. Slutzky E. The summation of random causes as the source of cyclic processes // Econometrica. 1937. Apr. Vol. 5 (2). P. 105–146.
44. Tucker H.J. It’s about time: the use of time in cross-sectional state policy research // American Journal of Political Science. 1982. Febr. Vol. 26 (1). P. 176–196.
45. Zerubavel E. Time maps: collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago, 2003.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Шебло О.Д. Методологический статус времени в политической науке. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2020;26(1):122-152. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-122-152
For citation:
Sheblo O.D. Methodological status of time in political science. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2020;26(1):122-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-122-152
Просмотров:
1060
Послать статью по эл. почте 