On the biopolitics of power and society: petitions for animal protection in Russia, Germany and France (based on Change.org petitions)

The study in the context of the biopolitics of power and society suggests a cross-cultural comparison of the petitional activity of the population of Russia, Germany, France, devoted to the protection of animals. The material was composed of archives of the international digital platform Change.org (22452 Russian-language petitions geographically connected with Russia, 1036 German-language petitions geographically connected with Germany, 15887 French-language petitions geographically connected with France). Online petitions of Change.org do not have legislative force, however, according to the established practice, the authorities, following the results of public discussions, can solve the problems stated in the petitions.

The use of AntConc software allowed us to identify petitions for the protection of animals in the general archive. It turned out that the number of petitions filed about animals in Germany was 12%, in Russia – 9, in France – 8%. Among the ‘winning’ petitions there are 25% of them about animals in the Federal Republic of Germany, 16 – in Russia and 10% – in France. The phenomenon of petition support for animal protection by the authorities in the study was called ‘imitative posthumanism’. It was suggested that ‘imitative humanism’ in societies with a high standard of living of the population indicates the interest of the authorities in public support, in societies with a low standard of living it testifies to the deficient social development.

According to the results of the study, there are twice as many petitions for the protection of domestic animals, regardless of the linguocultural discourse, compared to those submitted to defend wild animals. Wild animals are protected from murder and violence (during hunting, experiments, exploitation in zoos and circuses) and in some cases are considered in the context of environmental discourse. Pets are protected from harsh treatment, require regulation of relations between people who own animals (responsible possession), as well as protection of people from animals.

It is suggested that potential civic engagement in the protection of animals may be associated with environmental activism.

1. Agamben G. Homo sacer. Suverennaja vlast’ i golaja zhizn’ [Homo sacer. Sovereign Power and Naked Life]. M., 2011 (in Russian).

2. Ares E., Webb D., Ward M., Sutherland N. Debate on an e-petition relating to ending the export of live farm animals afer the UK leaves the EU // Number CDP 2018/0042. 2018. 20 Febr. URL: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriebng/Summary/CDP-2018-0042 (accessed: 06.07.2019).

3. Balistreri K. Ob animalisticheskoj literature [About animalistic literature] // Detskie chtenija [Children’s readings]. 2013. N 1 (3) (in Russian).

4. Beregoj N.E. Charl’z Darvin, vivisekcija i istorija viktorianskoj nauki [Charles Darwin, Vivisection and the History of Victorian Science] // Istoriko-biologicheskie issledovanija [Historical and biological research]. 2009. N 1 (1) (in Russian).

5. Bibalaeva L.N. K voprosu ob otnoshenii cheloveka k zhivotnym v mirovyh religijah: buddizme, hristianstve, islame [To the question of the relation of man to animals in world religions: Buddhism, Christianity, Islam] // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoj gosudarstvennoj akademii veterinarnoj mediciny im. N.Je. Baumana [Scientibc notes of the Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named afer N.E. Bauman]. 2010. N 202 (in Russian).

6. Borovik M.A., Mihel’ M.A. Dvizhenija po zashhite zhivotnyh: istorija, politika, praktika [Animal Welfare Movements: History, Politics, Practice] // Zhurnal issledovanij social’noj politiki [Social Policy Research Journal]. 2010. N 2 (8) (in Russian).

7. Caldwell L. K. Biopolitics // Yale Review. 1964. N 54.

8. Chernjak A.Z. Jekologicheskoe soznanie, prava zhivotnyh i spravedlivost’ [Environmental awareness, animal rights and justice] // Gumanitarnyj vestnik MGTU im. N.Je. Baumana [Humanitarian Bulletin of MSTU. N.E. Bauman]. 2018. N 4 (66). URL: http://hmbul.ru/catalog/hum/phil/519.html (accessed: 06.07.2019) (in Russian).

9. Cheshko V.F., Glazko V.I. High Hume (biovlast’ i biopolitika v obshhestve riska) [High Hume (biopower and biopolitics in a risk society)]. M., 2009 (in Russian).

10. Duma ne mogla prinjat’ zoozashhitnyj zakon mnogo let [Qe Duma could not pass a zoo-protection law for many years] // Lenta.ru. 2019.19.12. URL: https://lenta.ru/brief/2018/12/19/zivotina/ (accessed: 06.07.2019) (in Russian).

11. Egorsheva N. Minstroj ostavil lazejku dlja koshek v podvalah mnogojetazhek [Qe Ministry of Construction lef a loophole for cats in the cellars of high-rise buildings] // Rg.ru. 2018.24.07. URL: https://rg.ru/2018/07/24/minstroj-ostavil-lazejku-dlia-koshekv-podvalah-mnogoetazhek.html (accessed: 06.07.2019) (in Russian).

12. Fomin-Shahov O. Biopoliticheskij kontrol’ jelit [Elite Biopolitical Control] // Razvitie i jekonomika [Development and Economics]. 2013. N 8 (in Russian).

13. Fuko M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’: rozhdenie tjur’my. Disciplina [Supervise and punish: the birth of a prison. Discipline]. M., 1999 (in Russian).

14. Fuko M. Nuzhno zashhishhat’ obshhestvo: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1975–1976 uch.g. [Qe need to protect society:Qe course of lectures delivered at the College de France in the 1975–1976 academic year.]. SPb., 2005 (in Russian).

15. Fuko M. Psihiatricheskaja vlast’: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1973–1974 godu [Psychiatric Authority: Course of lectures delivered at the College de France in 1973–1974]. SPb., 2007 (in Russian).

16. Fuko M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1978–1979 uchebnom godu [Qe Birth of Biopolitics: Course of lectures delivered at the College de France in the 1978–1979 school year]. SPb., 2010 (in Russian).

17. Gol’brajh V.B. Jekologicheskij aktivizm: novye formy politicheskogo uchastija [Environmental activism: new forms of political participation] // Global’nye social’nye transformacii XX — nachala XXI vv. (k 100-letiju Russkoj revoljucii). Materialy nauchnoj konferencii IX Kovalevskie chtenija (9–11 nojabrja 2017 g.) [Global social transformations of the 20th — early 21st centuries (to the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution). Materials of the scientibc conference IX Kovalevsky readings (November 9–11, 2017)]. SPb., 2017 (in Russian).

18. Kremencov N.L. Chelovek i zhivotnoe: k istorii povedencheskih sopostavlenij [Man and animal: the history of behavioral comparisons]// Jetologija i zoopsihologija [Ethology and Zoopsychology]. 2010. N 2. URL: http://www.rbcu.ru/information/269/17389/ (accessed: 28.10.2019) (in Russian).

19. Laurette T.L., Walsh M.B. Qe competing meanings of “biopolitics” in political science // Politics and the Life Sciences. 2012. N 1–2 (31).

20. Lokshin P. Kak moskovskie koshki prevratilis’ v instrument politiki [How Moscow cats turned into a tool of politics] // Die Welt. 2019. URL: https://www.inopressa.ru/article/04Jan2019/welt/katzen.html (accessed: 06.07.2019) (in Russian).

21. Morley R. Bio-politics: an essay in the physiology, pathology and politics of the social and somatic organism. L., 1938.

22. Morozov E. Qe NET DELUSION: the dark side of Internet freedom. N.Y., 2011.

23. Oleskin A.V. Biopolitika. Politicheskij potencial sovremennoj biologii. Filosofskie, politologicheskie i prakticheskie aspekty [Biopolitics.Qe political potential of modern biology. Philosophical, political science and practical aspects]. M., 2001 (in Russian).

24. Oleskin A.V. Biopolitika [Biopolitics]. M., 2007 (in Russian).

25. Radina N.K. Psihologija i biopolitika: o perspektivah mezhdisciplinarnyh issledovanij [Psychology and Biopolitics: about the Prospects of Interdisciplinary Research] // Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 2017. Vol. 38. N 6 (in Russian).

26. Radina N.K. Sravnitel’nyj analiz jelektronnyh peticij v zashhitu zhivotnyh na cifrovyh platformah ROI i Change.org [Comparative analysis of electronic petitions for animal protection on digital platforms ROI and Change.org] // Socium i vlast’ [Society and power]. 2019. N 1 (75) (in Russian).

27. Radina N.K., Kim N.V. O psihologii “naivnogo antikonsjumerizma” v molodezhnoj srede [About the psychology of “naive anti-consumerism” in the youth environment] // Voprosy psihologii [Questions of Psychology]. 2014. N 6 (in Russian).

28. Radina N.K., Krupnaja D.A. Cifrovoe politicheskoe uchastie: jeRektivnost’ jelektronnyh peticij negosudarstvennyh cifrovyh platform (na materiale Change. org) [Digital Political Participation: Qe ERectiveness of Electronic Petitions of Non-Government Digital Platforms (based on Change.org)] // Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya [Polis. Political studies]. 2019. N 6 (in Russian).

29. Semenov K.P. Zhivotnye kak predmet i sredstvo prestuplenija: diss. … kand. jurid. n. [Animals as an object and a means of crime: PhD dissertation (in Law)]. SPb., 2016 (in Russian).

30. Tekeeva L.K.Domashnie Zhivotnye v tradicionnom mirovozzrenii tjurkojazychnyh narodov Severnogo Kavkaza (XIX — nachalo XX v.) [Pets in the traditional worldview of the Turkic-speaking peoples of the North Caucasus (XIX — early XX century)] // Istoricheskie, blosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul’turologija i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice]. 2013. N 11 (1) (in Russian).

31. Timofeeva O.V. “My” i “oni”: Soobshhestvo posle gumanizma [“We” and “Qey”: Qe Community afer Humanism] // Voprosy blosobi [Questions of Philosophy]. 2016. N 6 (in Russian).

32. Shafigullin V.A. Iz istorii razvitija biopoliticheskih znanij [From the history of the development of biopolitical knowledge] // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoj gosudarstvennoj Akademii veterinanrnoj mediciny im. N.Je. Baumana. Materialy vserossijskoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii “Aktual’nye problemy nauchnogo i kadrovogo obespechenija innovacionnogo razvitija APK” (29–31 maja 2012 g.) [Scientibc notes of the Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named afer N.E. Bauman. Materials of the AllRussian scientibc-practical conference “Actual problems of scientibc and personnel support of the innovative development of the agro-industrial complex” (May 29–31, 2012)]. Kazan, 2012 (in Russian).

33. Shherbak A. V Rossii vpervye prinjali zakon o zashhite zhivotnyh. Chto v nem napisano [In Russia for the brst time adopted a law on the protection of animals. What is written in it] // Tass.ru. 2018. URL: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/5925917 (accessed: 06.07.2019) (in Russian).