Medicine and society: micro level of social interaction
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-3-43-65
Abstract
This article examines the features of the interaction of social institutions of medicine and health care in modern Russian society at the micro level — within the social system “doctor — patient”. Sufficient space is given to a comparative analysis of traditional (paternalistic and collegial) and modern (informational and contractual) models of social relations between doctors and patients. Ne author highlights the factors under which the widespread use of information and contractual models in Russian realities contribute to the transformation of traditionally solidary social relations in the system under consideration into conflict ones.
The article, based on the original author’s sociological research, examines the features of the conflict confrontation between doctors and patients, identifies their specific differences from traditional social conflicts. On the one hand, the conflicts that unfold in the social system “doctor — patient” are precisely social conflicts, since the interaction in this system embraces both all representatives of the medical community and practically all members of society, each of which, one way or another, becomes patient. On the other hand, if the prerequisite and then the basis of the usual conflict interaction is the presence of a single indivisible object, then in the case of a social conflict in the “doctor — patient” system, health can hardly be considered “a single and indivisible object”. Health for the subjects of this conflict is indeed an important spiritual value, but much more often the conflict arises over the rights and obligations, as well as the distribution of power among the interacting parties.
Enough attention is paid to the analysis of the macro-, meso- and micro- causes of this conflict, as well as to the problem of the influence of the media on the genesis of this type of conflict relationship; tendencies that are especially characteristic in the relationship between the patient audience and the media in recent times are highlighted and revealed.
About the Author
T. V. SeminaRussian Federation
Semina Tatyana V., PhD Sci., Head of Department of the
Leninsky Prospect, 8, building 7, Moscow, 119049
References
1. Boluchevskaya V.V., Pavlyukova A.I., Sergeeva N.V. Obshchenie vracha: osobennosti professional’nogo vzaimodejstviya [Doctor’s communication: features of professional interaction] // Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossii: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. N 3. URL: http://medpsy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 15.04.2018) (in Russian).
2. Emanuel E.J., Emanuel L.J. Four models of the physician-patient relationship // JAMA. 1992. Vol. 276. N 16. P. 2221–2226.
3. Heritage J., Maynard D.W. Aber 30 years, problems and prospects in the study of doctor-patient interaction // Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness and Healing / Ed. by B.A. Pescosolido, J.K. Martin, J.D. McLeod, A. Rogers. Ch. 17. N.Y., 2011. P. 323–343.
4. Kuznecov A.V. Social’nye vzaimootnosheniya vrachej, pacientov i SMI v processe medikalizacii: avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata sociologicheskih nauk [Social relationships between doctors, patients and the media in the process of medicalization: author. diss. ... Cand. sociol. sciences]. Volgograd, 2009 (in Russian).
5. Minzdrav ozabochen chislom zhalob na narushenie etiki medrabotnikami [Re Ministry of Health is concerned about the number of complaints about violation of ethics by health workers]. URL: http://ria.ru/society/20121005/766927624.html#ixzz2Y3mgg5s5 (data obrashcheniya: 10.05.2019) (in Russian).
6. Mihal’chenko D.V., Mihal’chenko A.V. Neobhodimost’ dopolnitel’noj podgotovki vracha po voprosam vzaimootnoshenij s pacientom [Re need for additional training of the doctor on the relationship with the patient] // Volgogradskij nauchno-medicinskij zhurnal. 2014. N 2 (in Russian).
7. Nikolaeva V.V., Pervichko E.I., Zagorec T.P. Osobennosti otnoshenij v diade “vrachpacient” pri somatoformnyh rasstrojstvah [Features of the relationship in the “doctor — patient” dyad in somatoform disorders]. URL: https://psihologia.biz/psihologiyapsihologiya-obschaya_693/nikolaeva-pervichko-zagorets-osobennosti-16119.html (data obrashcheniya: 15.01.2018) (in Russian).
8. Petrov V.I., Sedova N.N. Problema kachestva zhizni v bioetike [Re problem of the quality of life in bioethics]. Volgograd, 2001 (in Russian).
9. Seleznev E.F., Chajcev V.G. Mediko-farmacevticheskie, informacionnoobrazovatel’nye problemy bioetiki (okonchanie) [Medical and pharmaceutical, information and educational problems of bioethics (end)] // Ekonomicheskij vestnik farmacii. 2005. N 3. URL: https://www.lawmix.ru/med/2880 (data obrashcheniya: 23.07.2019) (in Russian).
10. Semina T.V. Vliyanie sredstv massovoj informacii (SMI) na sferu zdravoohraneniya [Re incuence of the media (mass media) on the health sector] // Kazanskaya nauka. 2015. N 7 (in Russian).
11. Semina T.V. Prichiny social’nyh konciktov v sovremennom zdravoohranenii [Causes of social conflicts in modern health care] // Byulleten’ NCSSKH im. A.N. Bakuleva. Serdechno-sosudistye zabolevaniya. 2015. T. 16. N 3. Prilozhenie (in Russian).
12. Semina T.V. Sociologiya truda vracha v epohu globalizacii [Sociology of doctor’s work in the era of globalization]. M., 2015 (in Russian).
13. Semina T.V. Social’nyj koncikt “vrach — pacient” v sovremennom rossijskom obshchestve: ob’’ektivnye prichiny i sub’’ektivnye faktory [Social concict “doctor — patient” in modern Russian society: objective reasons and subjective factors] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya. 2016. N 1. S. 84–106 (in Russian).
14. Semina T.V. Faktory eskalacii social’nogo koncikta mediciny i naseleniya v usloviyah transformacii obshchestva [Factors of escalation of social concict between medicine and the population in the context of society transformation] // Politika i obshchestvo. 2017. N 10. S. 1–9 (in Russian).
15. Sergeev Yu.D., Mohov A.A. Nenadlezhashchie vrachevanie: vozmeshchenie vreda zdorov’yu i zhizni pacienta [Improper treatment: compensation for harm to the patient’s health and life]. M., 2007 (in Russian).
16. Seredina N.V., Shkurenko D.A. Osnovy medicinskoj psihologii [Fundamentals of Medical Psychology]. Rostov n/D., 2003 (in Russian).
17. Siluyanova I.V. Izbrannye. O prizvanii vracha [Re chosen ones. About the calling of a doctor]. M., 2008 (in Russian).
18. Siluyanova I.V. Paternalizm i informirovannoe soglasie: problema sovmestimosti [Paternalism and Informed Consent: Re Problem of Compatibility] // Glavnyj vrach. 2006. N 3 (in Russian).
19. Syrejshchikova I.A. Osnovaniya vozniknoveniya pravootnoshenij, svyazannyh s okazaniem medicinskoj pomoshchi [Grounds for the emergence of legal relations associated with the provision of medical care] // Yurist. 2008. N 11 (in Russian).
20. Osipova N.G., Semina T.V., Solomatina E.N. Social concict in the modern Russian society on the example of the “doctor-patient” relations // Ponte. 2017. Vol. 73. N 11. P. 295–310.
21. Vitch R. Modeli moral’noj mediciny v epohu revolyucionnyh izmenenij [Models of moral medicine in the era of revolutionary changes] // Voprosy alosoai. 1994. N 3. S. 25–34 (in Russian).
22. Volchanskij M.E. Sociologiya koncikta v medicine: diss. … dokt. sociol. Nauk [Sociology of concict in medicine: diss. ... doct. sociol. sciences]. Volgograd, 2008 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Semina T.V. Medicine and society: micro level of social interaction. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2020;26(3):43-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-3-43-65