Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Digitalization and its simulated consequence (based on sociocultural interaction in institutional communication)

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-4-89-117

Abstract

This article attempts to summarize the humanitarian works by domestic and foreign scholars on various aspects of globalization. We conduct a preliminary assessment of the consequences for the institutional environment, intercultural and interlanguage interaction, burdened by a professional component. Digitalization is considered herewith as the main result of globalization processes that implements the “principle of optimality”. Based on the results of scholars' research in the field of humanitarian knowledge, we carried out a content analysis of various types of institutional discourse: marketing, political and educational, on the example of which are shown positive and requiring careful application results of a global turn to digital. As a “symbolic” manifestation of the consequences of global digitalization, relevant for intercultural and interlanguage communication, we put forward hybridization that is implemented at various levels of the language. The article critically analyzes concepts, strategies, and social practices contributing to the digitalization of various types of space: the concept of a “smart city”, image formation strategies, locus branding, practices for creating political identity, etc. Particular attention is paid to the media that help to construct institutional space and form public opinion and the assessment of an event or a phenomenon of surrounding reality. We consider a new type of translation — audiovisual, which has a significant impact on the market of translation services. The latter is due to the increased role of audiovisual content, the use of which allows us to overcome geographical spaces and consolidate various ethnic societies. Particular scientific attention is paid to educational trends. Saturation of the electronic environment with relevant materials largely depends on approaches to training. A benchmark for the formation of universal competence requires a review of a university graduate profile and an assessment of the needs of labour markets. Total digitalization implies the formation of discursive personalities capable of developing an institutional virtual environment taking into account intercultural and interlanguage specifics. The conclusion emphasizes the “many faces” (diversity) of digitalization as a cultural phenomenon.

About the Author

I. A. Guseynova
Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation

Guseynova Innara A. - Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of German and translation, Faculty of translation and Interpreting, Moscow State Linguistic University.
st. Ostozhenka, 38, bld. 1, Moscow, 119034.



References

1. Alpatov V.M. Jazykovoj aspekt globalizacii [The Linguistic Aspect of Globalization] // Jazyk v global'nom kontekste: sovremennaja jazykovaja situacija kak sledstvie processa globalizacii: sb. nauch. trudov / otv. red.: V.V. Potapov, E.A. Kazak. M., 2018 (in Russian).

2. Beck U. Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt a/M., 2007.

3. Belinskij A.V., Nikulichev Ju.V. “Amerikanskie gorki”: evoljucija otnoshenij mezhdu SSHA i FRG v 1989-2019 gg. [The “Roller Coaster”: evolution of USA — Germany Relations in 1989-2019] // Aktual'nye problemy evropy. 2019. N 4. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2019.04.08 (in Russian).

4. Bukeeva M.E. Gibridnye zhanry prezentacionnogo diskursa [Hybryd Genres of Presentation Discourse]: avtoreferat diss. ... kand. filol. nauk. M., 2014 (in Russian).

5. Gorozhanov A. Institutional educational virtual environment for linguistic purposes: theory and practice. Kazan, 2019 (in Russian).

6. Guseynova I.A. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie osnovanija zhanrovoj sistemy v marketingovom diskurse [Communicative — pragmatic Foundations of Marketing Discourse Genre system]: avtoref. diss. ... d. filol. nauk. M., 2010 (in Russian).

7. Das Spiel der Sprachen: Working with Languages. Graz, 2009.

8. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Chto takoe filosofija? [What is Philosophy] M., SPb., 1998 (in Russian).

9. Denisova G.V. Intertekst v kommunikativnoj real'nosti sovremennogo polikul'turnogo prostranstva Rossii i Italii [Intertext in Communicative Reality of Modern Russian and Italian Multicultural space]: avtoref. diss. . d. kul'turologii. Saransk, 2019 (in Russian).

10. Dinnie K. City branding: theory and cases. L., 2009.

11. Zyrjanov V.V., Noskova A.V., Osipova N.G., Titova M.A. Nacional'naja sistema obrazovanija v Rossii: Problemy i perspektivy v kontekste reformirovanija i globalizacii [National education system in Russia: Problems and Prospects within the Context of Reform and Globalization] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. 2015. N 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2015-0-3-61-78 (in Russian).

12. Elishev S.O. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie podhody k izucheniju ponjatij “cennost'”, “cennostnye orientacii” [Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the “Value” and “Value Approaches” Concepts studies] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. 2010. N 3 (in Russian).

13. Hansen-Schirra S. Nutzbarkeit von Sprachtechnologien fur die translation // Journal of translation and technical Communication Research. 2012. N 5 (2). URL:http://www.trans-kom.eu/bd05nr02/trans-kom_05_02_02_Hansen-Schirra_sprachtech-nologien.20121219.pdf (accessed: 14.05.2020).

14. Hohne S. Kunst- und Kulturmanagement. Paderborn, 2009.

15. Kiklewitz A.K. Dinamicheskaja lingvistika: mezhdu kodom i diskursom [Dynamic Linguistics: Between Code and Discourse]. Har‘kov, 2014 (in Russian).

16. Korjakovceva N.F., Gal‘skova N.D., Guseynova I.A. Sovremennoe lingvisticheskoe obrazovanie: perspektivy razvitija. Koll. monografija [Modern Linguistic education: Development Prospects. Joint monograph]. M., 2018 (in Russian).

17. Krastev I. Posle Evropy [After Europe]. M., 2018 (in Russian).

18. Mercer S., Ryan St. Talented for Languages? Describing the Mindsets of Advanced Language Learners // Das spiel der Sprachen: Working with Languages / E. Schwarz, S. Mercer (Hrsg.). Graz, 2009.

19. Osipova N.G. Otraslevaja matrica sovremennoj sociologii: krizis divergencii [The Industry Matrix of Modern sociology: Divergence Crisis] // Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 18. 2013. N 2 (in Russian).

20. Parshin P.B. Territorija kak brend. Marketingovaja metafora, identichnost' i konkurencija [Territory as a Brand. Marketing Metaphor and Competition]. M., 2015 (in Russian).

21. Pisanova T.V., Al'vares Soler A.A. Prostranstva kommunikacii Ispanii i Latinskoj Ameriki: mnogojazychie, literatura, tradicii perevoda [Communication space of Spain and Latin America: Multilingualism, Literature, translation traditions]. M., 2019 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Guseynova I.A. Digitalization and its simulated consequence (based on sociocultural interaction in institutional communication). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2020;26(4):89-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-4-89-117

Views: 1200


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)