Sociology as a project of modernity

Sociology is an unusual science. Many authors call its current state “paradoxical”, other authors speak about the crisis of this science. The article presents sociology as a project of the modern era. This interpretation can explain many of the contradictions and eclectic results of its development.

Sociology as a project initiated by O. Comte was to combine social philosophy and empiricism. The latter was represented by socio-economic statistics and surveys, which were carried out in accordance with common sense by representatives of the state and other people. The project was aimed to create from these elements, different in nature, an integral science, built on the principles of natural sciences,i.e. representing a single hierarchy — from the most general ideas to concrete calculations.

This project failed. The article discusses the reasons for this situation and different results of the project.

The results of the sociological project can be conditionally divided into five groups: 1) “small” particular laws that say little about society as a whole; 2) specific methods of empirical research that yield accurate results in the fields of politics, marketing, human resource management, etc.; 3) the results achieved by deterministic theories; 4) sociological antinomies; 5)“negative results, which are also results” and lead to the comprehension of the fact, that there are some areas of social reality, to which scientific methods are radically inapplicable. Despite the fact that the goal of the project turned out to be unattainable, these results must be treated with reverence, because they are the work of outstanding scientists who called themselves sociologists, and some of them are really able to improve people’s lives. Today sociology is losing its monopoly on the production of useful knowledge about society, and its structure is beginning to be something like an exhibition of ideas in social philosophy and achievements in empirical studies of society.

1. Biznes v literature [Business in literature] / Pod red. S.A. Barkova, V.I. Zubkova. M., 2014 (in Russian).

2. Bourdieu P. Le sens pratique. P., 1979.

3. Bourdieu P. Struktury, Habitus, Praktiki [Structures, Habitus, Practices]. Novosibirsk, 1995 (in Russian).

4. D’yakonov I.M. Urartskie pis’ma i dokumenty [Urartian letters and document]. M.–L., 1963 (in Russian).

5. Dyurkgeim E. Samoubiistvo. Sotsiologicheskii etyud [Suicide: a study in sociology]. M., 2020 (in Russian).

6. Giddens E. Ustroenie obshchestva: ocherk teorii strukturatsii [The organization of society. Essay on the theory of structure]. M., 2005 (in Russian).

7. Gouldner A.W. The coming crisis of Western sociology. N.Y., 1970.

8. Granovetter M. Sila slabykh svyazei [The strength of weak ties] // Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. T. 10. 2009. N 4. P. 31–50 (in Russian).

9. Gumilev L.N. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli [Ethnogenesis and the Earth biosphere]. SPb., 2001 (in Russian).

10. Gumilev L.N. Konets i vnov’ nachalo [The end and the beginning again]. M., 1994 (in Russian).

11. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason]. M., 2017 (in Russian).

12. Kont O. Dukh pozitivnoi filosofii: slovo o polozhitel’nommyshlenii [Positive philosophy]. M., 2011 (in Russian).

13. Kont O. Obshchii obzor pozitivizma [General overview of positivism]. M., 2011 (in Russian).

14. Kozlovskii V.V. Opravdanie sotsiologicheskogo suzhdeniya [Justification of a sociological judgment/] // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii. 2000. N 1. P. 5–9 (in Russian).

15. Kozlovskii V.V. Utraty i obreteniya sotsiologii [The Losses and Acquisitions of Sociology] // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii. 1998. N 1. P. 25–40 (in Russian).

16. Krieken R., van. The paradox of the ‘two sociologies’: Hobbes, Latour and the Constitution of modern social theory // Journal of Sociology. 2002. Vol. 38. N 3. P. 5–273.

17. Melikishvili G.A. Urartskie klinoobraznye nadpisi [Urartian wedge-shaped inscriptions]. M., 1960 (in Russian).

18. Mnatsakanyan M.O. Modern i postmodern v sovremennoi sotsiologii [Modern and Postmodern in Contemporary Sociology/] // Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2008. N 12. P. 46–51 (in Russian).

19. Orlanov G.B. Sotsial’nyi determinizm. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Social determinism. Methodological bases of management theory and practice]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

20. Pautova L.A., Figura A.O. Problema soznaniya i sotsiologicheskoe prizvanie [The problem of consciousness and sociological vocation] // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii. 2005. T. 8. N 4. P. 5–21 (in Russian).

21. Podoinitsyna I.I. Na podstupakh k sotsiologii postmoderna [On the approaches to postmodern sociology] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika. 2008. N 4. P. 547–551 (in Russian).

22. Puzikov V.G., Turchenko V.N. Sotsiologiya: krizis i paradoksy [Sociology: crisis and paradoxes] // Omskie sotsial’no-gumanitarnye chteniya — 2015. Materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii / Pod red. L.A. Kudrinskoi. Omsk, 2015. P. 119–127 (in Russian).

23. Riley D. The paradox of positivism // Commentary. 2007. Vol. 31. N 1. P. 115–126.

24. Romanovskii N.V. Diskurs krizisa (v) sovremennoi sotsiologii [Crisis Discourse in Modern Sociology] // Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2016. N 4. S. 3–12.

25. Ryvkina R.V. Paradoksy rossiiskoi sotsiologii [Paradoxes of Russian sociology] // Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 1997. N 4. P. 197–208 (in Russian).

26. Semenova V.V. Kachestvennye metody: vvedenie v gumanisticheskuyu sotsiologiyu [Qualitative Methods: Introduction to Humanistic Sociology]. M., 1998 (in Russian).

27. Shcherbina V.V. O sovremennom sostoyanii sotsiologicheskoi nauki [On the Modern State of Sociological Science] Р. 1, 2 // Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. 2013. Vol. 15. N 1(77). P. 60–71; Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. 2013. Vol. 15. N 2(78). P. 65–74 (in Russian).

28. Smelser N.J. Sources of unity and disunity in sociology // American Sociologist. 2015. Vol. 46. N 3. P. 303–312.

29. Summers J.H. The end of sociology? // Boston Review. 2003. N 28(6). URL: http://bostonreview.net/BR28.6/contents.html (accessed: 10.03.2020).

30. Turchenko V.N. Paradoksy i paradigmy sovremennoi sotsiologii [Paradoxes and Paradigms of Modern Sociology] // Sotsiologiya v Sibiri; sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Materialy mezhregional’noi nauchno-teoreticheskoi konferentsii, sostoyavsheisya v Novosibirskom gosudarstvennom arkhitekturno-stroitel’nom universitete. Novosibirsk, 2003. P. 64–85 (in Russian).

31. Turner S. American sociology: from pre-disciplinary to post-normal. Basingstoke, 2014.

32. Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma [Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism]. M., 2020 (in Russian).

33. What is wrong with Ssociology? / Ed. by S. Cole. New Brunswick, 2000.