Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

The concept of collaborative design by Henry Sanoff

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2021-27-1-239-250

Abstract

*The article deals with the concept of participatory design proposed by the american urban planning specialist Henry Sanoff. The author provides with historical and sociological context of the formation of the concept of participatory design. The key episode in the development of the concept of participatory design is defined by the dispute in the theory of architecture between functional modernism in the person of L. Corbusier and individual-oriented concepts of urban planning, which were formed in the works of P. Geddes, E. Howard, J. Jacobs, L. Mumford and J. Gehl. The author considers the concept of participatory design as a conceptual deepening of individual-oriented theories, resulting in the justification of not only taking into account the needs of city residents in urban planning, but also the need for their participation in urban design. As the author notes, the key premises of forming the concept of participatory design are the culture of participation and the policy of participation. The culture of participation defends the position of the individual as an active subject and as a producer of social and cultural meanings. The policy of participation is based on participatory democracy and the idea of active involvement of civil society in management processes. The article discusses the basic principles of the concept of participatory design by G. Sanoff and the mechanics of their implementation.

About the Author

D. D. Abagero
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Abagero Daniel D., Post-Graduate Student of the Department of Contemporary Sociology, Faculty of Sociology

Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow, 119234



References

1. Abagero D.D. Social’nye mehanizmy vkljuchenija individa v kommunikativnoe prostranstvo goroda [Social mechanisms of the inclusion of the individual in the communicative space of the city] // Sociodinamika. 2020. N 2. S. 35–45 (in Russian).

2. Dzhekobs D. Smert’ i zhizn’ bol’shih amerikanskih gorodov [Death and life of large American cities]. M., 2011 (in Russian).

3. Dzhenkins G. Konvergentnaja kul’tura [Convergent Culture]. M., 2019 (in Russian).

4. Geddes P. Cities in evolution: an introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics. М., 2011.

5. Gejl Ja. Goroda dlja ljudej [Cities for people]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

6. Govard Je. Goroda-sady budushhego [Garden-cities of the future]. M., 1992 (in Russian).

7. Hester R. Community Design Primer. Mendocino, 1990.

8. Ivashinenko N.N. Partisipatornyj podhod v reshenii problem naselenija [A participatory approach in solving population problems] // Narodonaselenie. 2012. N 2. S. 16–22 (in Russian).

9. Korbjuz’e L. Planirovka gorodov [City planning]. M., 1933 (in Russian).

10. Mumford L. The city in history. N.Y., 1989.

11. Osipova N.G. Zapadnaja sociologija v XX stoletii: kljuchevye figury, napravlenija i shkoly [Western sociology in the XX century: key figures, trends and schools]. M., 2018 (in Russian).

12. Proektnaja gruppa 8. Obshhestvennye prostranstva dlja ljudej i s ljud’mi [Project group 8. Public spaces for people and with people]. URL: http://www.8architects.com/ index (data obrashhenija: 28.04.2020) (in Russian).

13. Rykwert J. The seduction of place: the city in the twenty-first century. L., 2000.

14. Samygin S.I., Krotov D.V., Shilina N.A. Subkul’tury i kul’tury souchastija — shodstvo i razlichie [Subcultures and cultures of complicity — similarities and differences] // Gumanitarnye, social’no-jekonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki. 2017. N 8. S. 1–8 (in Russian).

15. Sanoff H. Integrating programming, evaluation and participation in design. Brookfield, 1992.

16. Sanoff G. Souchastvujushhee proektirovanie. Praktiki obshhestvennogo uchastija v formirovanii sredy bol’shih i malyh gorodov [Collaborative Design. Practices of public participation in shaping the environment of cities and towns]. Vologda, 2015 (in Russian).

17. Sanoff H. Community participation methods in design and planning. N.Y., 2000.

18. Sivkov D. Ju. Immunitet v kamne: arhitekturnaja teorija Petera Sloterdajka [Immunity in stone: the architectural theory of Peter Sloterdijk] // Sociologija vlasti. 2014. N 2. S. 39–55 (in Russian).

19. Skott D. Blagimi namerenijami gosudarstva. Pochemu i kak provalivalis’ proekty uluchshenija uslovij chelovecheskoj zhizni [Good intentions of the state. Why and how projects to improve human conditions have failed]. M., 2005 (in Russian).

20. Spinuzzi C. The methodology of participatory design // Technical Communication.2005. N2. P. 163–174.

21. Vershinina I.A. Sovremennye teorii goroda: sociologicheskij analiz [Modern theories of the city: a sociological analysis]. M., 2019 (in Russian).

22. Vil’kovskij M. Sociologija arhitektury [Sociology of architecture]. M., 2010 (in Russian).

23. Whyte W. Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, 1991.


Review

For citations:


Abagero D.D. The concept of collaborative design by Henry Sanoff. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2021;27(1):239-250. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2021-27-1-239-250

Views: 1485


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)