Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Uncertainty or totalitarianism — a difficult choice for himanity

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2021-27-4-49-77

Abstract

Humanity has always perceived uncertainty as an extremely negative characteristic of the environment. With a certain degree of convention, the entire development of civilization can be viewed as a struggle against uncertainty. And by the 2020s, people had acquired a powerful weapon for this struggle — information and communication technologies. They have created unprecedented opportunities to monitor and predict the development of a huge number of objects (or/and subjects).

However, as is always the case in the development of society, clear success is coupled with serious problems generated by it. Minimizing uncertainty turns into total control over people. A new type of totalitarianism is emerging. In many of its features, it is similar to its predecessor of the twentieth century, but it also has its own characteristics. Whereas the “old” totalitarianism was built around the protection and implementation of ideological values, the new totalitarianism is based on managerial imperatives and the desire to avoid uncertainty. If within the framework of the “old” totalitarianism the subject of control was only the state with its specially designed structures, in the new totalitarianism people are controlled not only by state bodies, but also by corporations.

The most important feature of the new totalitarianism is that modern technology begins to consistently destroy the lacunae of human freedom in all spheres of social life, and above all in the economy. The planned economy of the twentieth century could not completely subordinate the people’s economic behavior to a single center. The lacunae of freedom were used by a lot of people, who managed to produce and trade independently from the state.

Today, humanity faces a difficult choice — either to continue to get rid of uncertainty, making society even more totalitarian, or to realize the positive aspects of uncertainty and begin to fight against the new totalitarianism.

About the Author

S. A. Barkov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Barkov Sergey A., Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Head of Department of Economic Sociology and Management, Faculty of Sociology,

Leninskiye Gory, 1-33, Moscow, 119234



References

1. Baehr P. Totalitarianism in America? Robert Nisbet on the “Wilson war state” and beyond // de American Sociologist. A Conservative in Academe: Robert Nisbet and American Sociology. 2014. Vol. 45. N 1. P. 84–102.

2. Barkov S.A. Sotsiologicheskii analiz rynkov truda v Rossii i Germanii (sovmestnyi proekt MGU i Universiteta prikladnykh issledovanii rynka truda g. Mangeima) [Sociological analysis of labor markets in Russia and Germany (jount project MSU and Mannheim university of applied labor market studies)] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sociologiya i politologiya. 2019. Vol. 25. N 2. P. 36–39. DOI:10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-2-36-39 (in Russian).

3. Barkov S.A., Zubkov V.I. Monologi i dialogi o postmoderne i postmodernizme [Monologues and Dialogues on Postmodernism and Postmodernism]. M., 2019 (in Russian).

4. Burykin A.N. Totalitarnoe upravlenie kak kompleks otchuzhdenno-byurokraticheskikh metodov [Totalitarian Management as a Complex of Alienation-Bureaucratic Methods] // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya filosofskie nauki. 2009. Vol. 2. P. 35–43 (in Russian).

5. Carr N.J. Blesk i nishcheta informatsionnykh tekhnologii [de splendour and misery of information technology]. M., 2005 (in Russian).

6. Eguneva M.V. Totalitarnoe myshlenie: dekonstruktsiya real’nosti [Totalitarian dinking: Deconstruction of Reality] // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. № 1. P. 4–7 (in Russian).

7. Gabovich E.Ya. Mnogovariantnost’ istorii kak sledstvie prodazhnosti istorikov [Multiple versions of history as a consequence of venality of historians]. URL: https://history.wikireading.ru/291650 (accessed: 22.06.2021) (in Russian).

8. Harari Y.N. Sapiens. Kratkaya istoriya chelovechestva [Sapiens. A Brief History of Humanity]. M., 2021 (in Russian).

9. Hayek F. Doroga k rabstvu [de road to slavery]. M., 2005 (in Russian).

10. Inozemtsev V.L. Na poroge inykh vremen. Chto zhdet chelovechestvo v nastupayushchem desyatiletii [On the dreshold of Other Times. What awaits humanity in the coming decade] // Snob. 2019.26.12. URL: https://snob.ru/entry/186876 (accessed: 20.06.2021) (in Russian).

11. Marx K. Razlichie mezhdu naturfilosofiei Demokrita i naturfilosofiei Ehpikura [de Difference Between the Natural Philosophy of Democritus and the Natural Philosophy of Epicurus] // Marx K. Iz rannikh proizvedenii. M., 1956 (in Russian).

12. Mazhirina A.A. Totalitarizm: nekotorye voprosy teorii i istorii [Totalitarianism: Some Issues of deory and History] // Voenno-yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2010. N 4. P. 30–32 (in Russian).

13. Nisbet R.A. Quest for Community. N.Y., 1953.

14. Rastorguev V.N. Edinoderzhavie: novye liki totalitarizma [de Uniform Power: New Faces of Totalitarianism] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2009. N 1. P. 43–50 (in Russian).

15. Robinson S. How corporations make America like the USSR // Salon. 2012.17.07. URL:https://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/the_new_totalitarianism_how_american_corporations_have_made_america_like_the_soviet_union_salpart (accessed: 02.11.2020).

16. Shafarevich I.R. Sotsializm kak yavlenie mirovoi istorii [Socialism as phenomenon of the world history]. M., 2003 (in Russian).

17. Shang Yang. Kniga pravitelya oblasti Shan [Book of the ruler of the Shan State]. M., 2020 (in Russian).

18. Shanin A.A. Novyi totalitarizm (obzor klassicheskikh traktovok totalitarizma s pozitsii sovremennosti) [New totalitarianism (review of classical interpretations of totalitarianism from the perspective of modernity)] // Vestnik VoLGU. Seriya 9.Issledovaniya molodykh uchenykh. 2007. P.90-92 (in Russian).

19. Timofeev I. Sumerki Zapada? Novyi totalitarizm, refleksiya i svobodnaya mysl’ [Twilight of the West? New totalitarianism, reflexivity and free thought] // Sait Rossiiskogo soveta po mezhdunarodnym delam. 2019.17.09. URL:https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/sumerki-zapada-novyytotalitarizm-refleksiya-i-svobodnaya-mysl (accessed: 20.06.2021) (in Russian).

20. Vasserman A.A. Skelety v shkafu istorii [Skeletons in the wardrobe of history]. M., 2012 (in Russian).

21. Vekhorev Yu.A. Sobstvennost’, politicheskaya vlast’ i totalitarnoe gosudarstvo [Property, political power and totalitarian state] // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Pravo. 2003. N 2. P. 172–177 (in Russian).

22. Yurchenko N. Novyi amerikanskii totalitarizm. Pochemu SSHA pokhoronili svoyu mechtu? [New American Totalitarianism. Why did USA buried their dream?] // Life. 2020.09.06. URL: https://life.ru/p/1328208 (accessed: 20.06.2021) (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Barkov S.A. Uncertainty or totalitarianism — a difficult choice for himanity. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2021;27(4):49-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2021-27-4-49-77

Views: 1167


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)