Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

The social consequences of platform self-employment

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2025-31-4-51-66

Abstract

The modern labor market is undergoing transformation under the influence of accelerated development of digital technologies and the introduction of digital platforms. A digital platform is an information system that brings together various types of actors (representatives of government agencies, commercial and non-commercial organizations, individuals, etc.) and allows them to exchange digital products, services, and information in the digital space. Platform employment is a flexible form of work organization in which interaction between actors takes place through such digital platforms. The most common types of platform employment are online freelancing, delivery, logistics, and education. Modern self-employed workers have partially or completely transferred some of their work functions to digital platforms. It is important to note that not all self-employed people work on digital platforms. Platform employment includes not only the self-employed, but also other categories of workers. The growth of platform self-employment has numerous social consequences, both positive and negative. These include a decline in social protection, worsening working conditions, growing inequality, and a lack of job stability. This article is based on the results of a survey of self-employed people who carry out their professional activities through digital platforms and have had their first experience of analyzing and evaluating their professional experience in the digital ecosystem of self-employment. The main conclusion of the study is that most self-employed people (62.32%) agree with the statement that favorable conditions for professional activity have been created in Russia today. The main social consequences of platform-based self-employment can be summarized as follows. There are more women than men among platform-based self-employed people (70.43% and 29.57%). The average age of self-employed people is 35. The main types of activities for the platform self-employed people surveyed are information services (23.1), household services (12.5), and educational services (11.7). Self-employed people actively use digital platforms and services in their professional activities (52.49%). The main digital services for them are social networks, video hosting, messengers, email, and communication (MTS, Beeline, Megafon, VKontakte, Odnoklassniki, Telegram, Rutube, Mail.ru, Yandex Mail, etc.) (73.42%). The main advantages of using digital platforms and services compared to traditional ones (without using the Internet) are convenience and 24/7 availability (68.77%), time savings (55.48%), and the ability to work remotely (44.85%). Self-employed people lack the following digital resources: for finding customers and clients (42.75%), educational courses and training on business development (3 5.69%), platforms for drawing up and signing contracts online, and services for promoting goods and services through social networks (20.78% each). At the same time, most self-employed people (64.12%) do not use any social support measures but need the following types of support: financial (subsidies, grants, etc.) (16.94%), rental of workspace (9.97%), assistance in online promotion (8.97%), educational programs, training, tax breaks and deductions (8.64% each).

About the Authors

E. A. Sverdlikova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Sverdlikova Elena A., Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sociology and Management, Faculty of Sociology

Leninskie gory, 1, bldg. 33, Moscow, 119234 



A. S. Seleznyova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Seleznyova Alyona S., undergraduate student, Department of Economic Sociology and Management, Faculty of Sociology

Leninskie gory, 1, bldg. 33, Moscow, 119234 



References

1. Bourdieu P. Acts of resistance. Against the new myths of our time, Cambridge, 1998.

2. Dlya 90% platformennyh zanyatyh eta rabota osnovnoj istochnik dohoda. 25 yanvarya 2024 [For 90% of platform workers, this job is their main source of income. January 25, 2024] // Sajt Centra strategicheskih razrabotok (CSR). URL: https://www.csr.ru/ru/news/dlya-90-platformennykh-zanyatykh-eta-rabota-osnovnoy-istochnikdokhoda/ (in Russian).

3. Florida R. Kreativnyj klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut budushchee [The Creative Class: People Who Are Changing the Future. Translated from English]. M., 2007. ISBN 978-5-89817-185-8 (in Russian).

4. Hendi C.H. Vremya bezrassudstva. Iskusstvo upravleniya v organizacii budushchego [The Age of Uncertainty: The Art of Management in the Organization of the Future]. SPb., 2001 (in Russian).

5. Malone T.W., Laubacher J. The dawn of the e-lance economy // Harvard Business Review. 1998. Vol. 76. N 5. P. 144–153.

6. Maloun T.U. Trud v novom stoletii. Kak novye formy biznesa vliyayut na organizacii, stil’ upravleniya i vashu zhizn’ [Work in the New Century. How New Forms of Business Affect Organizations, Management Styles, and Your Life]. M., 2006 (in Russian).

7. Krauch K. Vostorzhestvuet li gigonomika? [Will Gigonomics Triumph?] // Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya. 2019. N 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vostorzhestvuet-li-gigonomika (data obrashcheniya: 19.05.2025) (in Russian).

8. Kravchenko S.A. Sociologiya cifrovizacii: Uch. dlya vuzov. M., 2025. ISBN 978-5-534-14307-2 [Sociology of Digitalization: A Textbook for Universities] // Sajt Obrazovatel’noj platformy Yurajt. URL: https://urait.ru/bcode/567636 (in Russian).

9. Pink D. Naciya svobodnyh agentov: kak novye nezavisimye rabotniki menyayut zhizn’ Ameriki [The Freelancers Nation: How New Independent Workers Are Changing America]. M., 2006 (in Russian).

10. Platformennaya zanyatost’: dinamika razvitiya i social’no-ekonomicheskie effekty. Klyuchevye rezul’taty issledovaniya NIU VSHE 2024 g. [Platform Employment: Development Dynamics and Socio-Economic Effects. Key Findings of the 2024 HSE Research]. URL: https://isp.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/929451267.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 18.05.2025) (in Russian).

11. Sajt Federal’noj nalogovoj sluzhby (FNS). URL: https://rmsp.nalog.ru/statistics2.html (in Russian).

12. Social’nye garantii dlya platformennyh zanyatyh v Rossii — 2024. Rezul’taty social’no-ekonomicheskogo monitoring [Social guarantees for platform workers in Russia — 2024. Results of socio-economic monitoring]. URL: https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/66e/cz42mhivcz4efvjua99s0r3nipqbgl8e.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.05.2025) (in Russian).

13. Srnichek N. Kapitalizm platform [Platform Capitalism]. M., 2019 (in Russian).

14. Stending G. Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass [The Precariat: The Dangerous New Class]. M., 2014 (in Russian).

15. Svyatenko I. Platformennaya zanyatost’ dolzhna byt’ integrirovana v sistemu trudovyh i ekonomicheskih otnoshenij. 5 aprelya 2024 [Platform employment should be integrated into the system of labor and economic relations. April 5, 2024] // Sajt Soveta Federacii Federal’nogo sobraniya RF. URL: http://council.gov.ru/events/news/155295/ (in Russian).

16. Zuboff S.H. Epoha nadzornogo kapitalizma. Bitva za chelovecheskoe budushchee na novyh rubezhah vlasti [The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power]. M., 2022 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Sverdlikova E.A., Seleznyova A.S. The social consequences of platform self-employment. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2025;31(4):51-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2025-31-4-51-66

Views: 33


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)