Еffectiveness of public administration and regional power institutions in population estimates
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-3-150-168
Abstract
A hypothesis has been put forward that the existing basic characteristics of the executive authorities of region and the implementation by government officials of the apparatus regional administration of politically significant decisions contribute to raising the level of public confidence. Indicators of the quality of life of the population are based on a systemic development of the quality of provision of state and municipal services and a closer relationship with the overall dynamics of the perception of the state apparatus for the management of society. The modern state sets priorities for effective and effective development. These tasks actualize the tasks of conceptualizing analytical work in the field of assessing the effectiveness and effectiveness of public administration, which allows you to turn to the sociological institute of public opinion as an open and independent indicator of the state of quality of public administration. A high level of public confidence in the state increases the effectiveness of state policy, ultimately increasing the overall level of welfare of society. Public opinion can not only facilitate, complicate, and if possible, cancel reforms, but is also one of the most important indicators of how well the reforms are carried out. A high level of public confidence in the state management mechanism increases the effectiveness of state policy, ultimately increasing the overall level of welfare of society. Public opinion can not only facilitate, complicate, and if possible, cancel reforms, but is also one of the most important indicators of how well the reforms are carried out. In this case, mass trust is a certain form of embodiment of the hopes of the population of the region in improving the socio-political and social situation, improving the entire system of state and municipal government. The purpose of the study is to identify the potential of public confidence in the institutions of state power as an indicator of the effectiveness public administration, to identify trends in its growth, and to identify specific features of the established practices of regional governance.
About the Author
Yu. M. Bolshakova
SEI VO “Komi Republican Academy of Public Administration and Management”, Head of the Center for Social Monitoring and Forecasting
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bolshakova Yuliya M., Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Management
Syktyvkar, Respublika Komi, 167001
References
1. Bol’shakov S.N. Politika regional’nogo jekonomicheskogo razvitija: metody i mehanizmy. Serija “Nezavisimyj jekonomicheskij analiz” [Policy of regional economic development: methods and mechanisms. Series “Independent Economic Analysis”]. M., 2005 (in Russian).
2. Bol’shakova Ju.M. Innovacii v predostavlenii integrirovannyh gosudarstvennyh uslug: opyt Avstralii [Innovation in the provision of integrated public services: the experience of Australia] // Regional’nye problemy preobrazovanija jekonomiki. 2014. N 10 (in Russian).
3. Bocharova A.K. Mehanizm ocenki jeffektivnosti dejatel’nosti organov ispolnitel’noj vlasti sub#ektov Rossijskoj Federacii: preprint WP14/2012/05 [The mechanism for assessing the effectiveness of the executive bodies of the subjects of the Russian Federation: preprint]. Nac. issled. un-t “Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki”. M., 2012 (in Russian).
4. Danilin A.B. Jelektronnye gosudarstvennye uslugi i administrativnye reglamenty: ot politicheskoj zadachi k arhitekture “jelektronnogo pravitel’stva” [Electronic public services and administrative regulations: from a political task to the architecture of “electronic government”]. M., 2004 (in Russian).
5. Denhardt R.B., Denhardt J.V. The new public service: serving rather than steering // Public Administration Review. 2000. Nov.–Dec. Vol. 60. N 6. P. 549–559.
6. Dunleavy P., Margetts H, Bastow S., Tinkler J. New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2006. Vol. 16. N 3. P. 467–494.
7. General and particular in evaluating the public sector efficiency // In Administrative Management Public. 2003. N 1.
8. Giddens Je. Nespokojnyj i mogushhestvennyj kontinent. Chto zhdet Evropu v budushhem [An uneasy and powerful continent. What awaits Europe in the future]. M., 2015 (in Russian).
9. Gudkov L. Strah kak ramka ponimanija proishodjashhego [Fear as a framework for understanding what is happening] // Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 1999. N 6. S. 46–53 (in Russian).
10. Hejne P. Jekonomicheskij obraz myshlenija [Introduction to the science of public administration. Notes on the theory of organization]. M., 1993 (in Russian).
11. Izmerenie infljacionnyh ozhidanij i potrebitel’skih nastroenij na osnove oprosov naselenija. Razvernutyj otchet. Po zakazu banka Rossii [Measurement of inflationary expectations and consumer sentiments based on population surveys. The detailed report. By order of the Bank of Russia.]. 2016. URL: http://www.cbr.ru/dkp/standart_system/fom_15-06.pdf (data obrashhenija: 11.07.2017) (in Russian).
12. Jakobson L.I., Mersinjanova I.V. Sotrudnichestvo gosudarstva i struktur grazhdanskogo obshhestva v reshenii social’nyh problem [Cooperation of the state and civil society structures in solving social problems] // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravlenija. 2011. N 2. S. 5–24 (in Russian).
13. Kalgin A.S. Upravlenie po rezul’tatam na regional’nom urovne: kontrol’ ili rezul’tativnost’? [Results-based management at the regional level: control or effectiveness?] // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravlenija. 2012. S. 35–60 (in Russian).
14. Kalgin A.S. Administrativnaja reforma i administrativnye cennosti: analiz reform v rusle Novogo gosudarstvennogo upravlenija: preprint WP8/2014/05/ [Administrative reform and administrative values: analysis of reforms in the mainstream of the New State Administration: preprint]. Nac. issled. un-t “Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki”. M., 2014 (in Russian).
15. Krasil’nikova M. Dostojnaja bednost’ [Worthy Poverty]. M., 2016 // https://www.levada.ru/2016/07/19/dostojnaya-bednost/ (data obrashhenija: 17.06.2017) (in Russian).
16. Levada Ju.A. Ishhem cheloveka. Sociologicheskie ocherki. 2000–2005 [We are looking for a person. Sociological essays. 2000–2005]. M., 2006. (in Russian).
17. Monitoring kachestva i dostupnosti gosudarstvennyh i municipal’nyh uslug–2010. [Monitoring of quality and accessibility of state and municipal services– 2010] / Pod red. A.V. Klimenko, S.M. Plaksina; Nac. issled. un-t “Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki”. M., 2011 (in Russian).
18. Morev M.V. Opyt regional’nyh sociologicheskih issledovanij [Experience of regional sociological research] // Jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2015. N 5(41) (in Russian).
19. Nisnevich Ju.A. Administrativnaja reforma: celi i rezul’taty [Administrative Reform: Goals and Results] // Vestnik RUDN. Ser. “Politologija”. 2008. N 4. S. 5–16 (in Russian).
20. Pearson J. Efficiency as the primary value in the public administration. URL: http://patimes.org/efficiency-primary-public-administration
21. Pru G. Sex discrimination commissioner. Institute of public administration National Conference. Wrest Point Conference Centre. Tasmania. Friday 4 November 2005. URL: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/news/speeches/efficiencyeffectivenessand-equity-public-administration
22. Smorgunov L.V. Sravnitel’nyj analiz politiko-administrativnyh reform: ot novogo gosudarstvennogo menedzhmenta k ponjatiju “governance” [Comparative analysis of political and administrative reforms: from the new state management to the notion of “governance”] // Politicheskie issledovanija. 2003. N 4 (in Russian).
23. Stoian M., Ene N.C. General and particular in evaluating the public sector efficiency // In Administrative Management Public. 2003. N 1.
24. Uajt L.D. Vvedenie v nauku gosudarstvennogo upravlenija. Zametki po teorii organizacii // Klassiki teorii gosudarstvennogo upravlenija: amerikanskaja shkola / Pod red. Dzh. Shafritca, A. Hajda. M., 2003. S. 105–117 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Bolshakova Yu.M. Еffectiveness of public administration and regional power institutions in population estimates. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2018;24(3):150-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-3-150-168
Views:
2742
Email this article 