Technosocial inequalities in the digital age
https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-82-96
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of relationship between social, techno-social subjects and artificial intelligence systems in the future mixed society. The threats of possible techno-social inequality both between humans and robots, and between ordinary people and persons, implanted chips to increase their intellectual capabilities, are considered. The necessity of development moral and legal norms of subjects behavior in the mixed society is emphasized. The author reveals methodological foundations of bioethics and proposes strategic steps for constructing interactions of actors in a mixed society.
About the Author
K. A. Dallakian
Ufa law Institute of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dallakian Karlen A., Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of social humanitarian and economic disciplines
Muksinova street, 2, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, 450103
References
1. Alekseev N.N. Russkij narod i gosudarstvo [Russian people and state]. M., 1998 (in Russian).
2. Azimov A. Roboty i imperija [Robots and Empire]. M., 2007 (in Russian).
3. Azimov A. Horovod [Round dance] // Ja, robot [I, the robot]. M., 2008 (in Russian).
4. Berdjaev N.A. Novoe Srednevekov’e [New Middle Ages]. M., 2018 (in Russian).
5. Dallakjan K.A. Robojetika [Roboethics] // Sajt Russian Behavioral Unit. 2018. URL: https://humanai.ru (in Russian).
6. Dallakjan K.A. Dorozhnaja karta po razrabotke principov robojetiki [Roadmap for developing principles of roboethics] // Sajt Russian Behavioral Unit. 2018. URL: https://humanai.ru (in Russian).
7. Dudorov E. Gotovim robota “Fedora” k poletu v kosmos [We are preparing the robot “Fedor” for flight into space] // RIA Novosti. 2019. 27.02. URL: https://ria. ru.cdn.ampproject.org (in Russian).
8. Gilman E., Barth D. Zero Trust Networks. Sebastopol, 2017.
9. Harari Ju.N. Homo Deus. Kratkaja istorija budushhego [Homo Deus. A brief history of the future]. M., 2018 (in Russian).
10. Janickij O.N. Chetvertaja nauchno-tehnicheskaja revoljucija i glubinnye izmenenija processov globalizacii [The fourth scientific and technological revolution and the profound changes in globalization processes] // Vestnik Instituta sociologii. 2017. N 21 (in Russian).
11. Kissindzher G. Kak zavershaetsja jepoha Prosveshhenija [How the Enlightenment Ends] // Rossija v global’noj politike. 2018. N 4 (in Russian).
12. Kostjuchenko E. Tridcatiletnjaja istorija “grupp smerti” — ot Juzneta do nashih dnej [The thirty-year history of “death groups” - from Yuznet to the present day] // Novaja gazeta. 2019.15.05. N 51 (in Russian).
13. Kudrin A. Rossijskij investicionnyj forum [Russian Investment Forum]. Sochi, 2017 (in Russian).
14. Kurtcveil R. Jevoljucija razuma [The evolution of the mind]. M., 2015 (in Russian).
15. Kurzweil R. The age of spiritual machines. N.Y., 1999.
16. Osipova N.G. Neravenstvo v jepohu globalizacii: sushhnost’, instituty, regional’naja specifika i dinamika [Inequality in the era of globalization: essence, institutions, regional specifics and dynamics] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 18. Sociologija i politologija [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2014. N 2 (in Russian).
17. Perevod principov po robojetike [Translation of principles on roboethics]. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers // Sajt Russian Behavioral Unit. 2017. URL: https://humanai.ru. S. 17–18 (in Russian).
18. Social’nyj rejting v Kitae [Social ranking in China] // TADVISER. 2019.10.04 (in Russian).
19. The Guardian. Interfax. 2017.20.08.
20. Vershinina I.A., Martynenko T.S. Neravenstvo v sovremennom mire: obzor mezhdunarodnyh dokladov [Inequality in the modern world: a review of international reports] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2016. Vol. 22. N 3 (in Russian).
21. Veruggio G. EURON Roboethics Roadmap. Genova, 2007.
22. Viktorov A.Sh. Instituty neravenstva v sovremennom obshhestve [Institutions of Inequality in Modern Society] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 18. Sociologija i politologija [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science]. 2019. N 1 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Dallakian K.A. Technosocial inequalities in the digital age. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2020;26(1):82-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-82-96
Views:
1256
Email this article 