Preview

Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science

Advanced search

Genesis and current state of interest groups system in France

https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-153-165

Abstract

The article is dedicated to development and current state of the interest groups system in France. The author shows that the development of the French interest groups system occurred under the influence of historical, cultural, social and institutional factors. For comparative researchers who analyze interest groups in different countries France represents a special case since it cannot be classified as either corporatist or pluralistic. Although initially the French model was closer to corporatism, the trade unions — an essential element of classical corporatist systems — always played much smaller role. In addition, in France there is a tradition of close interaction between elites, which directly affects the interest groups system. The most influential groups are those that enjoy privileged access to government officials which allows us to talk about sectoral corporatism. At the same time, pluralistic tendencies can be traced in the development of the French interest groups system. However, in France, the pluralization of the interest groups system is associated not with the development of market relations but with the fragmented structure of state power, in which the decision-making process is concentrated in pluralistic and at the same time elitist communities. The author concludes that the peculiarities of the development of the political system and political culture in France led to the existence of such a system of interest groups that combines both corporate and pluralistic features, but the logic of their interaction with the government is based on the principle of inter-elite interaction.

About the Author

P. S. Kanevskiy
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Kanevskiy Pavel S., Associate Professor, Candidate of Political Science, Department of Political Science and Sociology of Political Processes, Faculty of Sociology

Leninsky Gory 1-33, Moscow,  119234



References

1. Almond G. A comparative study of interest groups and the political process // The American Political Science Review. 1958. Vol. 52. N 1.

2. Colson A., Elgoibar E., Marchi F. Employee representatives in France: employers’ perceptions and expectations towards improved industrial relations // Promoting Social Dialogue in European Organizations / Ed. by M. Euwema, L. Munduate, P. Elgoibar, A.B. Garcia. N.Y., 2015.

3. Constantelos J. Interest group strategies in multi-level Europe // Journal of Public Affairs. 2007. N 7.

4. Elgie R., Griggs S. French politics: debates and controversies. L., 2013.

5. Grossman E., Saurugger S. Les groupes d’intérêt. Action collective et stratégies de représentation. P., 2012.

6. Grunberg G., Haegel F. Le bipartisme imparfait en France et en Europe // Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée. 2007. Vol. 14. N 2.

7. Hayward J. The state and the market economy: industrial patriotism and economic intervention in France. Cambridge, 1986.

8. Le répertoire. Haute Autorité pour la transparence de la vie publique. URL: https://www.hatvp.fr/le-repertoire/ (accessed: 06.09.2019).

9. Liu E. Systems of government in some foreign countries: France // Research and Library Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat. Hong Kong, 2000. URL: https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr99-00/english/sec/library/990rp08.pdf (accessed: 05.09.2019).

10. Reestr prozrachnosti Evrosoyuza [EU Transparency Register]. URL: http:// ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister (data obrashcheniya: 04.09.2019) (in Russian).

11. Russo Zh.-Zh. Ob obshchestvennom dogovore, ili Opyt o forme Respubliki (Pervyj nabrosok) [On the social contract, or Experience on the form of the Republic (First draft)] // Russo Zh.-Zh. Traktaty. M., 1969 (in Russian).

12. Russo Zh.-Zh. Pis’ma s gory [Letters from the Mountain] // Russo Zh.-Zh. Traktaty. M., 1969 (in Russian).

13. Siaroff A. Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: meaning and measurement // European Journal of Political Research. 1999. N 36.

14. Transparence et intégrité du lobbying, un enjeu de démocratie // Etat des Lieux Citoyen sur le Lobbying en France. Transparency International France. P., 2014.

15. Vybory vo Francii 2017 g.: itogi i perspektivy [French elections in 2017: results and prospects] / Otv. red. V.Ya. Shvejcer. M., 2017 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Kanevskiy P.S. Genesis and current state of interest groups system in France. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science. 2020;26(1):153-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-153-165

Views: 1394


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1029-3736 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8769 (Online)